Thomas Johnstone, Ethan Schonfeld, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Neelan J Marianayagam, Kelly H Yoo, John K Ratliff, Anand Veeravagu
{"title":"私人参保人群骶髂关节融合成本和应用趋势。","authors":"Thomas Johnstone, Ethan Schonfeld, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Neelan J Marianayagam, Kelly H Yoo, John K Ratliff, Anand Veeravagu","doi":"10.1177/21925682241309302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveDespite innovations in minimally invasive (MI) techniques for sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF), trends in utilization and associated costs remain unclear. In this study, we assessed these trends and costs in a database of privately insured patients.MethodsRecords of open and MI SIJFs were queried from the 2007-2021 MarketScan Databases with CPT codes. Net payments made by insurance carriers were identified, as were out-of-pocket payments made by patients for each encounter. Regression was used to model utilization, payments, and costs.Results4124 SIJFs were identified, 1626 (39.4%) of which were MI SIJF. SIJF utilization increased by 1176.2% throughout the study period (<i>P</i> < .001). However, open SIJF utilization peaked in 2012. Open SIJF utilization was not significantly associated with time (<i>P</i> = .18). By contrast, the peak utilization for MI procedures occurred in 2021. Spine surgeons' volume of MI SIJF increased by 258% over the study period (<i>P</i> < .001), while nonsurgeon volume of MI SIJF increased by 990.9% (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionPrivately insured patients have increasingly utilized SIJF over the past several years. This is predominantly due to the adoption of MI techniques by spine surgeons and nonsurgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2708-2713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Costs and Utilization in the Privately Insured Population.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Johnstone, Ethan Schonfeld, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Neelan J Marianayagam, Kelly H Yoo, John K Ratliff, Anand Veeravagu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241309302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveDespite innovations in minimally invasive (MI) techniques for sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF), trends in utilization and associated costs remain unclear. In this study, we assessed these trends and costs in a database of privately insured patients.MethodsRecords of open and MI SIJFs were queried from the 2007-2021 MarketScan Databases with CPT codes. Net payments made by insurance carriers were identified, as were out-of-pocket payments made by patients for each encounter. Regression was used to model utilization, payments, and costs.Results4124 SIJFs were identified, 1626 (39.4%) of which were MI SIJF. SIJF utilization increased by 1176.2% throughout the study period (<i>P</i> < .001). However, open SIJF utilization peaked in 2012. Open SIJF utilization was not significantly associated with time (<i>P</i> = .18). By contrast, the peak utilization for MI procedures occurred in 2021. Spine surgeons' volume of MI SIJF increased by 258% over the study period (<i>P</i> < .001), while nonsurgeon volume of MI SIJF increased by 990.9% (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionPrivately insured patients have increasingly utilized SIJF over the past several years. This is predominantly due to the adoption of MI techniques by spine surgeons and nonsurgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2708-2713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241309302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241309302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Costs and Utilization in the Privately Insured Population.
Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveDespite innovations in minimally invasive (MI) techniques for sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF), trends in utilization and associated costs remain unclear. In this study, we assessed these trends and costs in a database of privately insured patients.MethodsRecords of open and MI SIJFs were queried from the 2007-2021 MarketScan Databases with CPT codes. Net payments made by insurance carriers were identified, as were out-of-pocket payments made by patients for each encounter. Regression was used to model utilization, payments, and costs.Results4124 SIJFs were identified, 1626 (39.4%) of which were MI SIJF. SIJF utilization increased by 1176.2% throughout the study period (P < .001). However, open SIJF utilization peaked in 2012. Open SIJF utilization was not significantly associated with time (P = .18). By contrast, the peak utilization for MI procedures occurred in 2021. Spine surgeons' volume of MI SIJF increased by 258% over the study period (P < .001), while nonsurgeon volume of MI SIJF increased by 990.9% (P < .001).ConclusionPrivately insured patients have increasingly utilized SIJF over the past several years. This is predominantly due to the adoption of MI techniques by spine surgeons and nonsurgeons.
期刊介绍:
Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).