私人参保人群骶髂关节融合成本和应用趋势。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1177/21925682241309302
Thomas Johnstone, Ethan Schonfeld, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Neelan J Marianayagam, Kelly H Yoo, John K Ratliff, Anand Veeravagu
{"title":"私人参保人群骶髂关节融合成本和应用趋势。","authors":"Thomas Johnstone, Ethan Schonfeld, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Neelan J Marianayagam, Kelly H Yoo, John K Ratliff, Anand Veeravagu","doi":"10.1177/21925682241309302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveDespite innovations in minimally invasive (MI) techniques for sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF), trends in utilization and associated costs remain unclear. In this study, we assessed these trends and costs in a database of privately insured patients.MethodsRecords of open and MI SIJFs were queried from the 2007-2021 MarketScan Databases with CPT codes. Net payments made by insurance carriers were identified, as were out-of-pocket payments made by patients for each encounter. Regression was used to model utilization, payments, and costs.Results4124 SIJFs were identified, 1626 (39.4%) of which were MI SIJF. SIJF utilization increased by 1176.2% throughout the study period (<i>P</i> < .001). However, open SIJF utilization peaked in 2012. Open SIJF utilization was not significantly associated with time (<i>P</i> = .18). By contrast, the peak utilization for MI procedures occurred in 2021. Spine surgeons' volume of MI SIJF increased by 258% over the study period (<i>P</i> < .001), while nonsurgeon volume of MI SIJF increased by 990.9% (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionPrivately insured patients have increasingly utilized SIJF over the past several years. This is predominantly due to the adoption of MI techniques by spine surgeons and nonsurgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2708-2713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Costs and Utilization in the Privately Insured Population.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Johnstone, Ethan Schonfeld, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Neelan J Marianayagam, Kelly H Yoo, John K Ratliff, Anand Veeravagu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241309302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveDespite innovations in minimally invasive (MI) techniques for sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF), trends in utilization and associated costs remain unclear. In this study, we assessed these trends and costs in a database of privately insured patients.MethodsRecords of open and MI SIJFs were queried from the 2007-2021 MarketScan Databases with CPT codes. Net payments made by insurance carriers were identified, as were out-of-pocket payments made by patients for each encounter. Regression was used to model utilization, payments, and costs.Results4124 SIJFs were identified, 1626 (39.4%) of which were MI SIJF. SIJF utilization increased by 1176.2% throughout the study period (<i>P</i> < .001). However, open SIJF utilization peaked in 2012. Open SIJF utilization was not significantly associated with time (<i>P</i> = .18). By contrast, the peak utilization for MI procedures occurred in 2021. Spine surgeons' volume of MI SIJF increased by 258% over the study period (<i>P</i> < .001), while nonsurgeon volume of MI SIJF increased by 990.9% (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionPrivately insured patients have increasingly utilized SIJF over the past several years. This is predominantly due to the adoption of MI techniques by spine surgeons and nonsurgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2708-2713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241309302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241309302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:尽管骶髂关节融合术(SIJF)的微创(MI)技术有所创新,但其应用趋势和相关费用仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们在私人保险患者的数据库中评估了这些趋势和成本。方法:使用CPT编码从2007-2021年MarketScan数据库中查询open和MI sijf的记录。确定了保险公司支付的净费用,以及患者每次就诊的自付费用。回归用于对利用率、支付和成本进行建模。结果:共鉴定SIJF 4124例,其中MI SIJF 1626例(39.4%)。SIJF利用率在整个研究期间增加了1176.2% (P < .001)。然而,开放的SIJF利用率在2012年达到顶峰。开放SIJF的利用率与时间无显著相关(P = 0.18)。相比之下,MI程序的峰值利用率出现在2021年。脊柱外科医生的MI SIJF体积在研究期间增加了258% (P < 0.001),而非外科医生的MI SIJF体积增加了990.9% (P < 0.001)。结论:在过去的几年中,私人保险患者越来越多地使用SIJF。这主要是由于脊柱外科医生和非外科医生采用了心肌梗死技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Costs and Utilization in the Privately Insured Population.

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveDespite innovations in minimally invasive (MI) techniques for sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF), trends in utilization and associated costs remain unclear. In this study, we assessed these trends and costs in a database of privately insured patients.MethodsRecords of open and MI SIJFs were queried from the 2007-2021 MarketScan Databases with CPT codes. Net payments made by insurance carriers were identified, as were out-of-pocket payments made by patients for each encounter. Regression was used to model utilization, payments, and costs.Results4124 SIJFs were identified, 1626 (39.4%) of which were MI SIJF. SIJF utilization increased by 1176.2% throughout the study period (P < .001). However, open SIJF utilization peaked in 2012. Open SIJF utilization was not significantly associated with time (P = .18). By contrast, the peak utilization for MI procedures occurred in 2021. Spine surgeons' volume of MI SIJF increased by 258% over the study period (P < .001), while nonsurgeon volume of MI SIJF increased by 990.9% (P < .001).ConclusionPrivately insured patients have increasingly utilized SIJF over the past several years. This is predominantly due to the adoption of MI techniques by spine surgeons and nonsurgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信