{"title":"基于蒙特卡罗模拟的无扁平滤光片放射治疗电离室剂量测定校正方法。","authors":"Guolong Zhang, Ji Huang, Guoxin Wu, Sunjun Jin, Kun Wang, Hao Wu, Hui Zhang, Haizheng Yue, Ruijie Yang, Yujie Wang, Zhipeng Wang, Yaping Qi","doi":"10.1002/mp.17585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical use of flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy has significantly increased in recent years due to its effective enhancement of dose rates and reduction of scatter dose. A proposal has been made to adjust the incident electron angle of the accelerator to expand the application of FFF beams in areas such as large planning target volumes (PTVs). However, the inherent softening characteristics and non-uniformity of lateral dose distribution in FFF beams inevitably lead to increased dosimetry errors, especially for ionization chambers widely used in clinical practice, which may result in serious accidents during FFF radiotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study constructs a comprehensive Monte Carlo model that encompasses not only conventional FFF beams but also incorporates FFF beams with varying incident electron angles, to investigate dosimetry errors and correction methods in FFF radiotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We have innovatively introduced a FFF output correction factor (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>W</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) to address dosimetry errors in various ionization chambers under different incident electron angle conditions in FFF beams. The primary variations in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>W</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were analytically determined to result from changes in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>w</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${s}_{w,air}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and the perturbation correction terms of the ionization chamber.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ionization chambers with smaller sensitive volumes typically exhibit reduced dosimetry errors. Our findings indicate that for ionization chambers with sensitive volumes ranging from 0.016 to 0.125 cm<sup>3</sup>, the dosimetry error under various FFF beam conditions consistently remains below 1.15%. This study provides crucial guidance for selecting appropriate ionization chambers in FFF radiotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A correlation was established between the absorbed dose to water in beams with a flattening filter (WFF) and those without (FFF), defined by the FFF output factor (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>W</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$O{F}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). Using the proposed Monte Carlo model, the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>W</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$O{F}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> can be derived and applied to theoretically calculate the absorbed dose to water in FFF beams at varying incident electron angles, with a relative standard uncertainty of 0.2. This study provides a valuable reference for clinical dose measurements and crucial support for establishing dose calibration standards in FFF radiotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 3","pages":"1833-1844"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction method for ionization chamber dosimetry in flattening filter free radiotherapy based on Monte Carlo simulation\",\"authors\":\"Guolong Zhang, Ji Huang, Guoxin Wu, Sunjun Jin, Kun Wang, Hao Wu, Hui Zhang, Haizheng Yue, Ruijie Yang, Yujie Wang, Zhipeng Wang, Yaping Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The clinical use of flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy has significantly increased in recent years due to its effective enhancement of dose rates and reduction of scatter dose. A proposal has been made to adjust the incident electron angle of the accelerator to expand the application of FFF beams in areas such as large planning target volumes (PTVs). However, the inherent softening characteristics and non-uniformity of lateral dose distribution in FFF beams inevitably lead to increased dosimetry errors, especially for ionization chambers widely used in clinical practice, which may result in serious accidents during FFF radiotherapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study constructs a comprehensive Monte Carlo model that encompasses not only conventional FFF beams but also incorporates FFF beams with varying incident electron angles, to investigate dosimetry errors and correction methods in FFF radiotherapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We have innovatively introduced a FFF output correction factor (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>W</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) to address dosimetry errors in various ionization chambers under different incident electron angle conditions in FFF beams. The primary variations in <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>W</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> were analytically determined to result from changes in <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>w</mi>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${s}_{w,air}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and the perturbation correction terms of the ionization chamber.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ionization chambers with smaller sensitive volumes typically exhibit reduced dosimetry errors. Our findings indicate that for ionization chambers with sensitive volumes ranging from 0.016 to 0.125 cm<sup>3</sup>, the dosimetry error under various FFF beam conditions consistently remains below 1.15%. This study provides crucial guidance for selecting appropriate ionization chambers in FFF radiotherapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A correlation was established between the absorbed dose to water in beams with a flattening filter (WFF) and those without (FFF), defined by the FFF output factor (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>W</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$O{F}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>). Using the proposed Monte Carlo model, the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>W</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$O{F}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> can be derived and applied to theoretically calculate the absorbed dose to water in FFF beams at varying incident electron angles, with a relative standard uncertainty of 0.2. This study provides a valuable reference for clinical dose measurements and crucial support for establishing dose calibration standards in FFF radiotherapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"1833-1844\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:近年来,无扁平滤波放疗(FFF)因其能有效提高剂量率和减少散射剂量,在临床上的应用大幅增加。有人建议调整加速器的入射电子角,以扩大 FFF 射束在大计划靶体积(PTV)等领域的应用。目的:本研究构建了一个全面的蒙特卡洛模型,该模型不仅包括传统的FFF射束,还包括不同入射电子角的FFF射束,以研究FFF放射治疗中的剂量测定误差和校正方法:我们创新性地引入了FFF输出校正因子(k Q F F F , Q W F F ${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ ),以解决不同入射电子角条件下FFF射束在各种电离室中的剂量测定误差问题。通过分析确定了 k Q F F , Q W F F ${k}_{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ 的主要变化是由 s w , a i r ${s}_{w,air}$ 和电离室的扰动修正项的变化引起的:结果:敏感体积较小的电离室通常会减少剂量测定误差。我们的研究结果表明,对于敏感体积在 0.016 至 0.125 cm3 之间的电离室,在各种 FFF 射束条件下的剂量测定误差始终保持在 1.15% 以下。这项研究为在 FFF 放射治疗中选择合适的电离室提供了重要指导:在有扁平化滤波器(WFF)和无扁平化滤波器(FFF)的射束中,水的吸收剂量之间建立了相关性,由 FFF 输出因子(O F Q F F , Q W F F $O{F}_{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ )定义。利用所提出的蒙特卡洛模型,可以得出 O F Q F F , Q W F F $O{F}_{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ 并应用于理论计算不同入射电子角下 FFF 射束对水的吸收剂量,相对标准不确定性为 0.2。这项研究为临床剂量测量提供了有价值的参考,并为建立 FFF 放射治疗的剂量校准标准提供了重要支持。
Correction method for ionization chamber dosimetry in flattening filter free radiotherapy based on Monte Carlo simulation
Background
The clinical use of flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy has significantly increased in recent years due to its effective enhancement of dose rates and reduction of scatter dose. A proposal has been made to adjust the incident electron angle of the accelerator to expand the application of FFF beams in areas such as large planning target volumes (PTVs). However, the inherent softening characteristics and non-uniformity of lateral dose distribution in FFF beams inevitably lead to increased dosimetry errors, especially for ionization chambers widely used in clinical practice, which may result in serious accidents during FFF radiotherapy.
Purpose
This study constructs a comprehensive Monte Carlo model that encompasses not only conventional FFF beams but also incorporates FFF beams with varying incident electron angles, to investigate dosimetry errors and correction methods in FFF radiotherapy.
Methods
We have innovatively introduced a FFF output correction factor () to address dosimetry errors in various ionization chambers under different incident electron angle conditions in FFF beams. The primary variations in were analytically determined to result from changes in and the perturbation correction terms of the ionization chamber.
Results
Ionization chambers with smaller sensitive volumes typically exhibit reduced dosimetry errors. Our findings indicate that for ionization chambers with sensitive volumes ranging from 0.016 to 0.125 cm3, the dosimetry error under various FFF beam conditions consistently remains below 1.15%. This study provides crucial guidance for selecting appropriate ionization chambers in FFF radiotherapy.
Conclusion
A correlation was established between the absorbed dose to water in beams with a flattening filter (WFF) and those without (FFF), defined by the FFF output factor (). Using the proposed Monte Carlo model, the can be derived and applied to theoretically calculate the absorbed dose to water in FFF beams at varying incident electron angles, with a relative standard uncertainty of 0.2. This study provides a valuable reference for clinical dose measurements and crucial support for establishing dose calibration standards in FFF radiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.