与南非农村医疗机构实施结核病感染预防和控制有关的耻辱感--一项概述缓解机会的定性研究。

Helene-Mari van der Westhuizen, Rodney Ehrlich, Ncumisa Somdyala, Trisha Greenhalgh, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Chris C Butler
{"title":"与南非农村医疗机构实施结核病感染预防和控制有关的耻辱感--一项概述缓解机会的定性研究。","authors":"Helene-Mari van der Westhuizen, Rodney Ehrlich, Ncumisa Somdyala, Trisha Greenhalgh, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Chris C Butler","doi":"10.1186/s44263-024-00097-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) is a stigmatised disease with intersectional associations with poverty, HIV, transmission risk and mortality. The use of visible TB infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, such as masks or isolation, can contribute to stigma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To explore stigma in this condition, we conducted in-depth individual interviews with 18 health workers and 15 patients in the rural Eastern Cape of South Africa using a semi-structured interview guide and narrative approach. We used reflexive thematic analysis guided by line-by-line coding. We then interpreted these key findings using Link and Phelan's theoretical model of stigma, related this to stigma mitigation recommendations from participants and identified levels of intervention with the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants shared narratives of how TB IPC measures can contribute to stigma, with some describing feeling 'less than human'. We found TB IPC measures sometimes exacerbated stigma, for example through introducing physical isolation that became prolonged or through a mask marking the person out as being ill with TB. In this context, stigma emerged from the narrow definition of what mask-wearing symbolises, in contrast with broader uses of masks as a preventative measure. Patient and health workers had contrasting perspectives on the implications of TB IPC-related stigma, with patients focussing on communal benefit, while health workers focussed on the negative impact on the health worker-patient relationship. Participant recommendations to mitigate TB IPC-related stigma included comprehensive information on TB IPC measures, respectful communication between health workers and patients, shifting the focus of TB IPC messages to communal safety (which could draw on ubuntu, a humanist framework) and using universal IPC precautions instead of measures targeted at someone with infectious TB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health facilities may unwittingly perpetuate stigma through TB IPC implementation, but they also have the potential to reduce it. Evoking 'ubuntu' as an African humanist conceptual framework could provide a novel perspective to guide future TB IPC stigma mitigation interventions, including policy changes to universal IPC precautions.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"2 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stigma relating to tuberculosis infection prevention and control implementation in rural health facilities in South Africa - a qualitative study outlining opportunities for mitigation.\",\"authors\":\"Helene-Mari van der Westhuizen, Rodney Ehrlich, Ncumisa Somdyala, Trisha Greenhalgh, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Chris C Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-024-00097-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) is a stigmatised disease with intersectional associations with poverty, HIV, transmission risk and mortality. The use of visible TB infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, such as masks or isolation, can contribute to stigma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To explore stigma in this condition, we conducted in-depth individual interviews with 18 health workers and 15 patients in the rural Eastern Cape of South Africa using a semi-structured interview guide and narrative approach. We used reflexive thematic analysis guided by line-by-line coding. We then interpreted these key findings using Link and Phelan's theoretical model of stigma, related this to stigma mitigation recommendations from participants and identified levels of intervention with the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants shared narratives of how TB IPC measures can contribute to stigma, with some describing feeling 'less than human'. We found TB IPC measures sometimes exacerbated stigma, for example through introducing physical isolation that became prolonged or through a mask marking the person out as being ill with TB. In this context, stigma emerged from the narrow definition of what mask-wearing symbolises, in contrast with broader uses of masks as a preventative measure. Patient and health workers had contrasting perspectives on the implications of TB IPC-related stigma, with patients focussing on communal benefit, while health workers focussed on the negative impact on the health worker-patient relationship. Participant recommendations to mitigate TB IPC-related stigma included comprehensive information on TB IPC measures, respectful communication between health workers and patients, shifting the focus of TB IPC messages to communal safety (which could draw on ubuntu, a humanist framework) and using universal IPC precautions instead of measures targeted at someone with infectious TB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health facilities may unwittingly perpetuate stigma through TB IPC implementation, but they also have the potential to reduce it. Evoking 'ubuntu' as an African humanist conceptual framework could provide a novel perspective to guide future TB IPC stigma mitigation interventions, including policy changes to universal IPC precautions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622938/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00097-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00097-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结核病(TB)是一种与贫困、艾滋病毒、传播风险和死亡率交叉相关的污名化疾病。使用明显的结核病感染预防和控制措施,如口罩或隔离,可能会导致污名化。方法:为了探讨这种情况下的耻辱感,我们使用半结构化访谈指南和叙述方法对南非东开普省农村的18名卫生工作者和15名患者进行了深入的个人访谈。我们使用了由逐行编码指导的反身性主题分析。然后,我们使用Link和Phelan的耻辱感理论模型解释了这些关键发现,将其与参与者提出的减轻耻辱感的建议联系起来,并通过健康耻辱感和歧视框架确定了干预水平。结果:与会者分享了结核病IPC措施如何导致污名化的叙述,其中一些人描述了感觉“不像人”。我们发现,结核病预防和控制措施有时会加剧耻辱感,例如,通过引入延长的物理隔离,或通过口罩将患者标记为结核病患者。在这种情况下,与广泛使用口罩作为预防措施形成对比的是,对戴口罩象征意义的狭隘定义产生了耻辱感。患者和卫生工作者对结核病ipc相关污名的影响有着截然不同的看法,患者关注的是公共利益,而卫生工作者关注的是对卫生工作者与患者关系的负面影响。与会者提出的减轻结核病IPC相关污名的建议包括:提供有关结核病IPC措施的全面信息,卫生工作者和患者之间相互尊重的沟通,将结核病IPC信息的重点转移到公共安全(这可以利用人道主义框架ubuntu),以及使用普遍的IPC预防措施,而不是针对传染性结核病患者采取措施。结论:卫生机构可能通过实施结核病预防控制IPC而在不知不觉中使污名永久化,但它们也有可能减少污名。唤起“乌班图”作为非洲人道主义的概念框架,可以提供一个新的视角来指导未来减轻结核病感染预防污名的干预措施,包括改变普遍感染预防措施的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stigma relating to tuberculosis infection prevention and control implementation in rural health facilities in South Africa - a qualitative study outlining opportunities for mitigation.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a stigmatised disease with intersectional associations with poverty, HIV, transmission risk and mortality. The use of visible TB infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, such as masks or isolation, can contribute to stigma.

Methods: To explore stigma in this condition, we conducted in-depth individual interviews with 18 health workers and 15 patients in the rural Eastern Cape of South Africa using a semi-structured interview guide and narrative approach. We used reflexive thematic analysis guided by line-by-line coding. We then interpreted these key findings using Link and Phelan's theoretical model of stigma, related this to stigma mitigation recommendations from participants and identified levels of intervention with the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework.

Results: Participants shared narratives of how TB IPC measures can contribute to stigma, with some describing feeling 'less than human'. We found TB IPC measures sometimes exacerbated stigma, for example through introducing physical isolation that became prolonged or through a mask marking the person out as being ill with TB. In this context, stigma emerged from the narrow definition of what mask-wearing symbolises, in contrast with broader uses of masks as a preventative measure. Patient and health workers had contrasting perspectives on the implications of TB IPC-related stigma, with patients focussing on communal benefit, while health workers focussed on the negative impact on the health worker-patient relationship. Participant recommendations to mitigate TB IPC-related stigma included comprehensive information on TB IPC measures, respectful communication between health workers and patients, shifting the focus of TB IPC messages to communal safety (which could draw on ubuntu, a humanist framework) and using universal IPC precautions instead of measures targeted at someone with infectious TB.

Conclusions: Health facilities may unwittingly perpetuate stigma through TB IPC implementation, but they also have the potential to reduce it. Evoking 'ubuntu' as an African humanist conceptual framework could provide a novel perspective to guide future TB IPC stigma mitigation interventions, including policy changes to universal IPC precautions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信