在伯利兹开展的行为知情数字宣传活动及其与社交媒体参与和 COVID-19 疫苗接种的关系。

Giuliana Daga, Lajos Kossuth, Cynthia Boruchowicz, Florencia Lopez Boo, Natalia Largaespada Beer
{"title":"在伯利兹开展的行为知情数字宣传活动及其与社交媒体参与和 COVID-19 疫苗接种的关系。","authors":"Giuliana Daga, Lajos Kossuth, Cynthia Boruchowicz, Florencia Lopez Boo, Natalia Largaespada Beer","doi":"10.1186/s44263-024-00079-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing vaccination coverage was key to curbing the COVID-19 pandemic globally. However, lack of trust in the vaccine and fear of side effects in regions like the Caribbean resulted in a low uptake despite enough vaccine supply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two correlational analyses and one experiment between five sequential behaviorally informed Facebook campaigns, social media performance outcomes, and district-level vaccination data. First, we ran multivariate linear regression models to estimate the mean differences between the campaigns in (i) social media performance (\"Clicks\" and \"Engagement\") and (ii) COVID-19 vaccination uptake at the district level. \"Clicks\" were measured by the number of people who clicked on the respective Facebook advert and visited the official vaccination site. \"Engagements\" were the number of people interacting with the advert through likes and emojis. Second, we took advantage of the experimental design during one of the campaigns to analyze the differential effect of messages conveying information about the number of people reporting vaccination side effects using words (\"Few\"/ \"Majority) and numbers (\"3 out of 100 \") on social media performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlational analysis showed that the number of \"Clicks\" and \"Engagement\" was similar among campaigns, except for the campaign focusing on vaccines' effectiveness, which had 14.65 less clicks and 19.52 less engagements per advert (including controls and district-fixed effects) compared to the base \"It's safe\" campaign. Vaccination rates were highest at times coinciding with campaigns focusing on vaccination safety and effectiveness. Our experimental results showed that informational messages related to side effects that were framed using words (\"Majority did not report discomfort\"/ \"Few persons reported discomfort\") were better at generating \"Clicks\" compared to those using numbers (\"3 out of 100 reported discomforts\").</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facebook adverts highlighting vaccine safety had a similar level of social media performance as other campaigns, except for adverts focusing on vaccine efficacy, which performed worse. Communicating side-effect information with words instead of numbers can expand social media interest in low-uptake regions like the Caribbean. Our results serve as preliminary evidence for public health officials to encourage vaccine uptake in high-hesitancy contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"2 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviorally informed digital campaigns and their association with social media engagement and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Belize.\",\"authors\":\"Giuliana Daga, Lajos Kossuth, Cynthia Boruchowicz, Florencia Lopez Boo, Natalia Largaespada Beer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-024-00079-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing vaccination coverage was key to curbing the COVID-19 pandemic globally. However, lack of trust in the vaccine and fear of side effects in regions like the Caribbean resulted in a low uptake despite enough vaccine supply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two correlational analyses and one experiment between five sequential behaviorally informed Facebook campaigns, social media performance outcomes, and district-level vaccination data. First, we ran multivariate linear regression models to estimate the mean differences between the campaigns in (i) social media performance (\\\"Clicks\\\" and \\\"Engagement\\\") and (ii) COVID-19 vaccination uptake at the district level. \\\"Clicks\\\" were measured by the number of people who clicked on the respective Facebook advert and visited the official vaccination site. \\\"Engagements\\\" were the number of people interacting with the advert through likes and emojis. Second, we took advantage of the experimental design during one of the campaigns to analyze the differential effect of messages conveying information about the number of people reporting vaccination side effects using words (\\\"Few\\\"/ \\\"Majority) and numbers (\\\"3 out of 100 \\\") on social media performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlational analysis showed that the number of \\\"Clicks\\\" and \\\"Engagement\\\" was similar among campaigns, except for the campaign focusing on vaccines' effectiveness, which had 14.65 less clicks and 19.52 less engagements per advert (including controls and district-fixed effects) compared to the base \\\"It's safe\\\" campaign. Vaccination rates were highest at times coinciding with campaigns focusing on vaccination safety and effectiveness. Our experimental results showed that informational messages related to side effects that were framed using words (\\\"Majority did not report discomfort\\\"/ \\\"Few persons reported discomfort\\\") were better at generating \\\"Clicks\\\" compared to those using numbers (\\\"3 out of 100 reported discomforts\\\").</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facebook adverts highlighting vaccine safety had a similar level of social media performance as other campaigns, except for adverts focusing on vaccine efficacy, which performed worse. Communicating side-effect information with words instead of numbers can expand social media interest in low-uptake regions like the Caribbean. Our results serve as preliminary evidence for public health officials to encourage vaccine uptake in high-hesitancy contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00079-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00079-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提高疫苗接种覆盖率是全球遏制COVID-19大流行的关键。然而,在加勒比等地区,由于缺乏对疫苗的信任和对副作用的恐惧,尽管疫苗供应充足,但吸收率很低。方法:我们在五个连续的行为知情Facebook活动、社交媒体表现结果和区级疫苗接种数据之间进行了两次相关分析和一次实验。首先,我们运行多元线性回归模型来估计(i)社交媒体表现(“点击”和“参与”)和(ii)地区一级COVID-19疫苗接种之间的平均差异。“点击”是通过点击相应的Facebook广告并访问官方疫苗接种网站的人数来衡量的。“参与”是指通过点赞和表情符号与广告互动的人数。其次,我们在其中一次活动中利用实验设计来分析使用单词(“少数”/“多数”)和数字(“100分之3”)传达有关报告疫苗副作用的人数的信息对社交媒体表现的差异影响。结果:相关分析表明,各广告活动的“点击”和“参与”数量相似,除了关注疫苗有效性的广告活动,与基础的“它是安全的”广告活动相比,每个广告的“点击”次数少14.65次,每个广告的“参与”次数少19.52次(包括对照和区域固定效果)。疫苗接种率最高的时期,与注重疫苗接种安全性和有效性的运动相吻合。我们的实验结果表明,与使用文字(“大多数人没有报告不适”/“很少人报告不适”)构建的与副作用相关的信息比使用数字(“100人中有3人报告不适”)的信息更能产生“点击”。结论:强调疫苗安全性的Facebook广告与其他活动的社交媒体表现相似,但关注疫苗功效的广告表现较差。用文字而不是数字来传达副作用信息,可以在加勒比等低使用率地区扩大社交媒体的兴趣。我们的结果为公共卫生官员鼓励在高犹豫情况下接种疫苗提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behaviorally informed digital campaigns and their association with social media engagement and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Belize.

Background: Increasing vaccination coverage was key to curbing the COVID-19 pandemic globally. However, lack of trust in the vaccine and fear of side effects in regions like the Caribbean resulted in a low uptake despite enough vaccine supply.

Methods: We conducted two correlational analyses and one experiment between five sequential behaviorally informed Facebook campaigns, social media performance outcomes, and district-level vaccination data. First, we ran multivariate linear regression models to estimate the mean differences between the campaigns in (i) social media performance ("Clicks" and "Engagement") and (ii) COVID-19 vaccination uptake at the district level. "Clicks" were measured by the number of people who clicked on the respective Facebook advert and visited the official vaccination site. "Engagements" were the number of people interacting with the advert through likes and emojis. Second, we took advantage of the experimental design during one of the campaigns to analyze the differential effect of messages conveying information about the number of people reporting vaccination side effects using words ("Few"/ "Majority) and numbers ("3 out of 100 ") on social media performance.

Results: The correlational analysis showed that the number of "Clicks" and "Engagement" was similar among campaigns, except for the campaign focusing on vaccines' effectiveness, which had 14.65 less clicks and 19.52 less engagements per advert (including controls and district-fixed effects) compared to the base "It's safe" campaign. Vaccination rates were highest at times coinciding with campaigns focusing on vaccination safety and effectiveness. Our experimental results showed that informational messages related to side effects that were framed using words ("Majority did not report discomfort"/ "Few persons reported discomfort") were better at generating "Clicks" compared to those using numbers ("3 out of 100 reported discomforts").

Conclusions: Facebook adverts highlighting vaccine safety had a similar level of social media performance as other campaigns, except for adverts focusing on vaccine efficacy, which performed worse. Communicating side-effect information with words instead of numbers can expand social media interest in low-uptake regions like the Caribbean. Our results serve as preliminary evidence for public health officials to encourage vaccine uptake in high-hesitancy contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信