医师-临床编码员协作有效提高编码准确性:中国单中心前瞻性研究

Yicong Xu, Huanbing Zhu, Zhijun Xu, Fanying Jin, Jing Chen, Xuanliang Pan, Dong Cai, Shengdong Pan
{"title":"医师-临床编码员协作有效提高编码准确性:中国单中心前瞻性研究","authors":"Yicong Xu, Huanbing Zhu, Zhijun Xu, Fanying Jin, Jing Chen, Xuanliang Pan, Dong Cai, Shengdong Pan","doi":"10.1177/18333583241302402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Clinical coding is important for reimbursement, resource planning, administration and medical research. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate clinical coding accuracy and its influencing factors, especially the benefits of physician-clinical coder collaboration. <b>Method:</b> Twenty-four physicians and one senior clinical coder participated in the quality audit. The audit checklist, assessment criteria, training program and physician-clinical coder collaboration mechanism were clearly defined. The homepage filling standards, homepage filling guidelines and the guidelines of the <i>International Classification of Diseases</i> were used as the assessment criteria for evaluating accuracy. <b>Results:</b> A total of 323,320 medical records were reviewed. The average accuracy of homepage completion was 60.4% and poor-quality homepages accounted for 89.9% of coding errors. The average coding accuracy and correction percentage were 83.4% and 62.3%, respectively. After physician-clinical coder collaboration, the coding accuracy increased from 78.9% to 87.1% (χ² = 799.904, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001) and correction percentage increased from 52.0% to 73.0% (χ² = 1628.015, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that complexity of medical records (odds ratio (OR) = 0.625), quality of homepages (OR = 20.445), month of physician-clinical coder collaboration (OR = 1.133-2.297), coder's major (OR = 1.616), coding experience (OR = 1.953), work engagement (OR = 1.290) and day of the week (OR = 1.054) were factors influencing coding accuracy. <b>Conclusion:</b> Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improved clinical coding accuracy and clinical coders benefited greatly. However, homepage quality was not improved. Furthermore, homepage quality and psychological factors influenced coding accuracy. <b>Implications:</b> Managers should implement regular standardised training for homepage completion, alongside ongoing improvements in coding practices and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583241302402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improves coding accuracy: A single-centre prospective study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yicong Xu, Huanbing Zhu, Zhijun Xu, Fanying Jin, Jing Chen, Xuanliang Pan, Dong Cai, Shengdong Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18333583241302402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Clinical coding is important for reimbursement, resource planning, administration and medical research. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate clinical coding accuracy and its influencing factors, especially the benefits of physician-clinical coder collaboration. <b>Method:</b> Twenty-four physicians and one senior clinical coder participated in the quality audit. The audit checklist, assessment criteria, training program and physician-clinical coder collaboration mechanism were clearly defined. The homepage filling standards, homepage filling guidelines and the guidelines of the <i>International Classification of Diseases</i> were used as the assessment criteria for evaluating accuracy. <b>Results:</b> A total of 323,320 medical records were reviewed. The average accuracy of homepage completion was 60.4% and poor-quality homepages accounted for 89.9% of coding errors. The average coding accuracy and correction percentage were 83.4% and 62.3%, respectively. After physician-clinical coder collaboration, the coding accuracy increased from 78.9% to 87.1% (χ² = 799.904, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001) and correction percentage increased from 52.0% to 73.0% (χ² = 1628.015, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that complexity of medical records (odds ratio (OR) = 0.625), quality of homepages (OR = 20.445), month of physician-clinical coder collaboration (OR = 1.133-2.297), coder's major (OR = 1.616), coding experience (OR = 1.953), work engagement (OR = 1.290) and day of the week (OR = 1.054) were factors influencing coding accuracy. <b>Conclusion:</b> Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improved clinical coding accuracy and clinical coders benefited greatly. However, homepage quality was not improved. Furthermore, homepage quality and psychological factors influenced coding accuracy. <b>Implications:</b> Managers should implement regular standardised training for homepage completion, alongside ongoing improvements in coding practices and training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18333583241302402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241302402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241302402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床编码对报销、资源规划、行政管理和医学研究具有重要意义。目的:评价临床编码的准确性及其影响因素,特别是医患协作的效益。方法:24名医师和1名高级临床编码员参与质量审核。明确审核清单、考核标准、培训方案和医临床协作机制。以网页填写标准、网页填写指南和国际疾病分类指南作为准确性评价标准。结果:共审查了323,320份病历。网页完成率平均为60.4%,质量差的网页占编码错误的89.9%。平均编码正确率为83.4%,正确率为62.3%。医师与临床编码人员协作后,编码正确率从78.9%提高到87.1% (χ²= 799.904,p 0.001),正确率从52.0%提高到73.0% (χ²= 1628.015,p 0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,影响编码准确率的因素包括病案复杂程度(OR = 0.625)、网页质量(OR = 20.445)、医临床协作月份(OR = 1.133-2.297)、专业(OR = 1.616)、编码经验(OR = 1.953)、工作投入(OR = 1.290)和工作天数(OR = 1.054)。结论:医患协作有效提高了临床编码的准确性,临床编码人员受益较大。然而,主页的质量并没有得到改善。此外,主页质量和心理因素对编码精度也有影响。启示:管理人员应实施定期的标准化培训,以完成主页,同时不断改进编码实践和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improves coding accuracy: A single-centre prospective study in China.

Background: Clinical coding is important for reimbursement, resource planning, administration and medical research. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate clinical coding accuracy and its influencing factors, especially the benefits of physician-clinical coder collaboration. Method: Twenty-four physicians and one senior clinical coder participated in the quality audit. The audit checklist, assessment criteria, training program and physician-clinical coder collaboration mechanism were clearly defined. The homepage filling standards, homepage filling guidelines and the guidelines of the International Classification of Diseases were used as the assessment criteria for evaluating accuracy. Results: A total of 323,320 medical records were reviewed. The average accuracy of homepage completion was 60.4% and poor-quality homepages accounted for 89.9% of coding errors. The average coding accuracy and correction percentage were 83.4% and 62.3%, respectively. After physician-clinical coder collaboration, the coding accuracy increased from 78.9% to 87.1% (χ² = 799.904, p< 0.001) and correction percentage increased from 52.0% to 73.0% (χ² = 1628.015, p< 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that complexity of medical records (odds ratio (OR) = 0.625), quality of homepages (OR = 20.445), month of physician-clinical coder collaboration (OR = 1.133-2.297), coder's major (OR = 1.616), coding experience (OR = 1.953), work engagement (OR = 1.290) and day of the week (OR = 1.054) were factors influencing coding accuracy. Conclusion: Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improved clinical coding accuracy and clinical coders benefited greatly. However, homepage quality was not improved. Furthermore, homepage quality and psychological factors influenced coding accuracy. Implications: Managers should implement regular standardised training for homepage completion, alongside ongoing improvements in coding practices and training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信