年龄和种族的时间温度计测量不准确。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Rama A Salhi, Melissa A Meeker, Carey Williams, Theodore J Iwashyna, Margaret E Samuels-Kalow
{"title":"年龄和种族的时间温度计测量不准确。","authors":"Rama A Salhi, Melissa A Meeker, Carey Williams, Theodore J Iwashyna, Margaret E Samuels-Kalow","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rapid vital sign assessment, including temperature measurement, is critical among pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). While error rates in temporal thermometry are well documented, the potential for differential error rates by demographics is not well established. Our objective was to evaluate error rates of temporal thermometers by demographic variables, specifically race and age, among pediatric patients in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients (≤18 years old) identified as either Black or White in the medical record presenting to the ED between January 2020 and December 2022 who received at least one paired temperature measurement (temporal and oral/rectal temperature within 30 minutes) were included. Rates of discordance by demographic characteristics were then evaluated. Secondarily, we explored the characteristics of patients who received temporal thermometry only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final population included 1526 paired temperatures (1412 patients). Among all paired measurements, 26% had discordant measurements (25% in Black patients vs 26% in White patients). In the final adjusted model, children aged ≤12 years old were found to have 2-3 times higher odds of discordance than children >12 years old. Black patients were statistically significantly more likely to receive a temporal thermometer measurement only (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.33), even when controlling for fever-related chief complaints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age ≤12 years old was associated with increased odds of missed fever by temporal thermometry. In our secondary analysis, Black patients were found to be more likely to receive temporal thermometry only. These findings highlight the need for consistent, accurate measurement protocols among pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inaccuracy of Temporal Thermometer Measurement by Age and Race.\",\"authors\":\"Rama A Salhi, Melissa A Meeker, Carey Williams, Theodore J Iwashyna, Margaret E Samuels-Kalow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rapid vital sign assessment, including temperature measurement, is critical among pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). While error rates in temporal thermometry are well documented, the potential for differential error rates by demographics is not well established. Our objective was to evaluate error rates of temporal thermometers by demographic variables, specifically race and age, among pediatric patients in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients (≤18 years old) identified as either Black or White in the medical record presenting to the ED between January 2020 and December 2022 who received at least one paired temperature measurement (temporal and oral/rectal temperature within 30 minutes) were included. Rates of discordance by demographic characteristics were then evaluated. Secondarily, we explored the characteristics of patients who received temporal thermometry only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final population included 1526 paired temperatures (1412 patients). Among all paired measurements, 26% had discordant measurements (25% in Black patients vs 26% in White patients). In the final adjusted model, children aged ≤12 years old were found to have 2-3 times higher odds of discordance than children >12 years old. Black patients were statistically significantly more likely to receive a temporal thermometer measurement only (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.33), even when controlling for fever-related chief complaints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age ≤12 years old was associated with increased odds of missed fever by temporal thermometry. In our secondary analysis, Black patients were found to be more likely to receive temporal thermometry only. These findings highlight the need for consistent, accurate measurement protocols among pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102620\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:快速生命体征评估,包括体温测量,对急诊科(ED)儿科患者至关重要。虽然时间测温的错误率有很好的记录,但人口统计学差异错误率的可能性尚未得到很好的确定。我们的目标是通过人口统计学变量(特别是种族和年龄)评估急诊科儿科患者颞温计的错误率。方法:纳入在2020年1月至2022年12月期间就诊的儿科患者(≤18岁),这些患者在医疗记录中被确定为黑人或白人,并在30分钟内接受了至少一次配对温度测量(颞温和口腔/直肠温度)。然后评估人口统计学特征的不一致率。其次,我们探讨了仅接受颞部测温的患者的特征。结果:最终人群包括1526对温度(1412例患者)。在所有成对测量中,26%的测量结果不一致(黑人患者为25%,白人患者为26%)。在最终调整的模型中,≤12岁儿童的不一致率是bb0 - 12岁儿童的2-3倍。黑人患者更有可能只接受颞温测量(aOR 1.27, 95%CI: 1.22, 1.33),即使在控制发烧相关主诉的情况下也是如此。结论:年龄≤12岁与颞温测量漏热的几率增加有关。在我们的二次分析中,发现黑人患者更有可能只接受颞部测温。这些发现强调了在儿科患者中需要一致、准确的测量方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inaccuracy of Temporal Thermometer Measurement by Age and Race.

Objective: Rapid vital sign assessment, including temperature measurement, is critical among pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). While error rates in temporal thermometry are well documented, the potential for differential error rates by demographics is not well established. Our objective was to evaluate error rates of temporal thermometers by demographic variables, specifically race and age, among pediatric patients in the ED.

Methods: Pediatric patients (≤18 years old) identified as either Black or White in the medical record presenting to the ED between January 2020 and December 2022 who received at least one paired temperature measurement (temporal and oral/rectal temperature within 30 minutes) were included. Rates of discordance by demographic characteristics were then evaluated. Secondarily, we explored the characteristics of patients who received temporal thermometry only.

Results: The final population included 1526 paired temperatures (1412 patients). Among all paired measurements, 26% had discordant measurements (25% in Black patients vs 26% in White patients). In the final adjusted model, children aged ≤12 years old were found to have 2-3 times higher odds of discordance than children >12 years old. Black patients were statistically significantly more likely to receive a temporal thermometer measurement only (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.33), even when controlling for fever-related chief complaints.

Conclusions: Age ≤12 years old was associated with increased odds of missed fever by temporal thermometry. In our secondary analysis, Black patients were found to be more likely to receive temporal thermometry only. These findings highlight the need for consistent, accurate measurement protocols among pediatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信