IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carina Lundh Hagelin, Christina Melin-Johansson, Jane Österlind, Birgitta Bisholt, Susanna Pusa
{"title":"Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study.","authors":"Carina Lundh Hagelin, Christina Melin-Johansson, Jane Österlind, Birgitta Bisholt, Susanna Pusa","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01615-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With an increased number of people living with multiple progressive diseases, online education courses have been created to address the growing need for competence in palliative care. However, there is limited knowledge about the form and content of these courses, or of participants' experiences. This study aims to map the status, content, and evaluation of online palliative care courses in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory study used both quantitative and qualitative methods. The study process involved searching for online palliative care courses on the web and through contact with Swedish palliative care organisations, and then participating in these courses, surveying education providers, and analysing and validating responses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while thematic analysis was applied to the free-text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine online courses provided by five different organisations were mapped. These courses educated over 30 000 healthcare professionals, predominantly assistant nurses and registered nurses. There was a large discrepancy between the number of people who enrolled in and the number who completed the online courses. Shortcomings identified related to lack of systematic evaluation from the participants' perspectives, if and how knowledge was integrated into clinical practice, and difficulties in making the courses sustainable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overarching and national systems for online education are needed. These would require sustainability considerations and guidelines for implementation, evaluation and follow-up of non-university-based online educational initiatives in palliative care. In addition, it is crucial for employers to support professionals undergoing such education, ensuring that they are given opportunities to share their feelings and discuss any challenging thoughts that arise during and after the course.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01615-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着多种进展性疾病患者人数的增加,在线教育课程应运而生,以满足人们对姑息关怀能力日益增长的需求。然而,人们对这些课程的形式和内容以及参与者的经历了解有限。本研究旨在了解瑞典在线姑息关怀课程的现状、内容和评估情况:这项探索性研究采用了定量和定性两种方法。研究过程包括在网上搜索在线姑息关怀课程,并与瑞典姑息关怀组织联系,然后参与这些课程,调查教育提供者,分析并验证回复。采用描述性统计对定量数据进行分析,同时对自由文本回复进行主题分析:对五个不同机构提供的九门在线课程进行了调查。这些课程培训了 30 000 多名医护专业人员,主要是助理护士和注册护士。在线课程的注册人数和完成人数之间存在很大差异。发现的不足之处包括:缺乏从参与者角度出发的系统评估,知识是否以及如何融入临床实践,以及使课程可持续发展的困难:结论:需要为在线教育建立全国性的总体系统。结论:需要建立总体性的国家在线教育系统,这就需要考虑可持续性问题,并为姑息关怀领域非大学在线教育项目的实施、评估和跟踪提供指导。此外,雇主必须为接受此类教育的专业人员提供支持,确保他们有机会分享自己的感受,并讨论课程期间和课程结束后出现的任何具有挑战性的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study.

Background: With an increased number of people living with multiple progressive diseases, online education courses have been created to address the growing need for competence in palliative care. However, there is limited knowledge about the form and content of these courses, or of participants' experiences. This study aims to map the status, content, and evaluation of online palliative care courses in Sweden.

Methods: This exploratory study used both quantitative and qualitative methods. The study process involved searching for online palliative care courses on the web and through contact with Swedish palliative care organisations, and then participating in these courses, surveying education providers, and analysing and validating responses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while thematic analysis was applied to the free-text responses.

Results: Nine online courses provided by five different organisations were mapped. These courses educated over 30 000 healthcare professionals, predominantly assistant nurses and registered nurses. There was a large discrepancy between the number of people who enrolled in and the number who completed the online courses. Shortcomings identified related to lack of systematic evaluation from the participants' perspectives, if and how knowledge was integrated into clinical practice, and difficulties in making the courses sustainable.

Conclusion: Overarching and national systems for online education are needed. These would require sustainability considerations and guidelines for implementation, evaluation and follow-up of non-university-based online educational initiatives in palliative care. In addition, it is crucial for employers to support professionals undergoing such education, ensuring that they are given opportunities to share their feelings and discuss any challenging thoughts that arise during and after the course.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信