IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Wei Shen, Nan-Hai Xie, Xin-Yu Cong, Yong-Jun Zheng
{"title":"Study on the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy for Shoulder Pain Caused by Trigger Points.","authors":"Wei Shen, Nan-Hai Xie, Xin-Yu Cong, Yong-Jun Zheng","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (UG-PRF) with ultrasound-guided dry needling (UG-DN) for treating painful shoulder periarthritis (PSP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four patients with PSP were chosen from the Pain Department of the Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong between August 2022 and December 2023. They were divided into 2 groups, UG-PRF (n = 12) and UG-DN (n = 12), using a random number table. Both groups received 1 treatment session and stretching exercises afterwards. The study aims to analyze and compare the levels of pain severity (measured by Visual Analog Scale) and shoulder joint function (assessed using Shoulder Pain And Disability Index) among patients before treatment, at the 4-week mark posttreatment, and at the 12-week mark posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the 2 groups initially. After treatment, the UG-PRF group had a larger decrease in Visual Analog Scale score compared with the UG-DN group at 4 weeks (-1.3 ± 0.4; 95% CI: -2.2 ∼ -0.5) and 12 weeks posttreatment (-1.1 ± 0.5; 95% CI: -2.1 ∼ -0.0). Moreover, the UG-PRF group displayed markedly lower scores on the Shoulder Pain And Disability Index in comparison to the UG-DN group at both the 4-week (-17.3 ± 6.9; 95% CI: -31.7 ∼ -2.9) and 12-week (-17.0 ± 7.4; 95% CI: -32.3 ∼ -1.7) follow-up assessments. Furthermore, 87.5% of patients reported clinically significant improvements according to the Patient Global Impression of Change evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both UG-PRF and UG-DN therapy are effective treatments for PSP, with UG-PRF showing better results in reducing pain and improving shoulder mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究比较了超声引导下脉冲射频(UG-PRF)与超声引导下干针(UG-DN)治疗疼痛性肩关节周围炎的效果:选取2022年8月至2023年12月期间南通市第六人民医院疼痛科收治的24例肩关节周围炎疼痛患者。采用随机数字表法将他们分为两组:UG-PRF 组(12 人)和 UG-DN 组(12 人)。两组均接受一次治疗,治疗后进行伸展运动。研究旨在分析和比较患者在治疗前、治疗后4周和治疗后12周的疼痛严重程度(用VAS测量)和肩关节功能(用SPADI评估):结果:两组患者在治疗初期无明显差异。治疗后,在治疗后 4 周(-1.3±0.4)(95% CI:-2.2 ~ -0.5)和 12 周(-1.1±0.5)(95% CI:-2.1 ~ -0.0),UG-PRF 组的 VAS 评分下降幅度大于 UG-DN 组。此外,与 UG-DN 组相比,UG-PRF 组在 4 周(-17.3±6.9;95% CI:-31.7 ~-2.9)和 12 周(-17.0±7.4;95% CI:-32.3 ~-1.7)随访评估中的肩部疼痛和残疾指数得分明显较低。此外,87.5%的患者在 "患者全球变化印象 "评估中报告了明显的临床改善:讨论:UG-PRF疗法和UG-DN疗法都是治疗疼痛性肩关节周围炎的有效方法,其中UG-PRF疗法在减轻疼痛和改善肩关节活动度方面效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy for Shoulder Pain Caused by Trigger Points.

Objectives: This study compares ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (UG-PRF) with ultrasound-guided dry needling (UG-DN) for treating painful shoulder periarthritis (PSP).

Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients with PSP were chosen from the Pain Department of the Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong between August 2022 and December 2023. They were divided into 2 groups, UG-PRF (n = 12) and UG-DN (n = 12), using a random number table. Both groups received 1 treatment session and stretching exercises afterwards. The study aims to analyze and compare the levels of pain severity (measured by Visual Analog Scale) and shoulder joint function (assessed using Shoulder Pain And Disability Index) among patients before treatment, at the 4-week mark posttreatment, and at the 12-week mark posttreatment.

Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups initially. After treatment, the UG-PRF group had a larger decrease in Visual Analog Scale score compared with the UG-DN group at 4 weeks (-1.3 ± 0.4; 95% CI: -2.2 ∼ -0.5) and 12 weeks posttreatment (-1.1 ± 0.5; 95% CI: -2.1 ∼ -0.0). Moreover, the UG-PRF group displayed markedly lower scores on the Shoulder Pain And Disability Index in comparison to the UG-DN group at both the 4-week (-17.3 ± 6.9; 95% CI: -31.7 ∼ -2.9) and 12-week (-17.0 ± 7.4; 95% CI: -32.3 ∼ -1.7) follow-up assessments. Furthermore, 87.5% of patients reported clinically significant improvements according to the Patient Global Impression of Change evaluation.

Conclusion: Both UG-PRF and UG-DN therapy are effective treatments for PSP, with UG-PRF showing better results in reducing pain and improving shoulder mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信