平衡电解质溶液与0.9%生理盐水用于肾移植:最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001687
Susan S Wan, Kate Wyburn, Steven J Chadban, Michael G Collins
{"title":"平衡电解质溶液与0.9%生理盐水用于肾移植:最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Susan S Wan, Kate Wyburn, Steven J Chadban, Michael G Collins","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative intravenous fluids are administered to kidney transplant recipients to maintain hemodynamic stability and graft perfusion; however, the ideal fluid remains uncertain. Although 0.9% saline (saline) is commonly used, its high chloride content causes hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and may increase the risks of delayed graft function (DGF) and hyperkalemia. Balanced electrolyte solutions (BES) have a more physiological chloride concentration and may reduce these risks. Previous meta-analyses found insufficient evidence to compare BES with saline for these outcomes; however, new studies have recently been published. In this updated review, we compared the effects of BES with saline on the risk of DGF and hyperkalemia in kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing BES with saline in kidney transplantation. The primary outcomes were DGF and hyperkalemia. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and data were pooled for analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 1532 participants were included. The quality of evidence was high for deceased donor transplantation and very low for living donor transplantation. The relative risk (RR) of DGF associated with BES compared with saline was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.96; <i>P</i> = 0.01) in deceased donor transplantation. There was no difference in DGF in living donor transplantation (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.26-2.41; <i>P</i> = 0.68). There was no difference in hyperkalemia between groups (RR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.27; <i>P</i> = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with saline, BES reduces the risk of DGF in deceased donor kidney transplantation without increasing hyperkalemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 1","pages":"e1687"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balanced Electrolyte Solutions Versus 0.9% Saline for Kidney Transplantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Susan S Wan, Kate Wyburn, Steven J Chadban, Michael G Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative intravenous fluids are administered to kidney transplant recipients to maintain hemodynamic stability and graft perfusion; however, the ideal fluid remains uncertain. Although 0.9% saline (saline) is commonly used, its high chloride content causes hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and may increase the risks of delayed graft function (DGF) and hyperkalemia. Balanced electrolyte solutions (BES) have a more physiological chloride concentration and may reduce these risks. Previous meta-analyses found insufficient evidence to compare BES with saline for these outcomes; however, new studies have recently been published. In this updated review, we compared the effects of BES with saline on the risk of DGF and hyperkalemia in kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing BES with saline in kidney transplantation. The primary outcomes were DGF and hyperkalemia. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and data were pooled for analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 1532 participants were included. The quality of evidence was high for deceased donor transplantation and very low for living donor transplantation. The relative risk (RR) of DGF associated with BES compared with saline was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.96; <i>P</i> = 0.01) in deceased donor transplantation. There was no difference in DGF in living donor transplantation (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.26-2.41; <i>P</i> = 0.68). There was no difference in hyperkalemia between groups (RR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.27; <i>P</i> = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with saline, BES reduces the risk of DGF in deceased donor kidney transplantation without increasing hyperkalemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e1687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植受者围手术期静脉输液维持血流动力学稳定性和移植物灌注;然而,理想的流体仍然不确定。虽然常用0.9%生理盐水(生理盐水),但其高氯含量可引起高氯血症代谢性酸中毒,并可能增加移植物功能延迟(DGF)和高钾血症的风险。平衡电解质溶液(BES)具有更高的生理氯浓度,可以降低这些风险。先前的荟萃分析没有足够的证据来比较BES和生理盐水的这些结果;然而,最近发表了新的研究。在这篇最新的综述中,我们比较了BES与生理盐水对肾移植中DGF和高钾血症风险的影响。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL中比较BES与生理盐水在肾移植中的随机对照试验。主要结局是DGF和高钾血症。对符合条件的研究进行偏倚风险评估,并汇总数据进行分析。采用建议分级评估、发展和评价框架来评估证据的质量。结果:纳入10项研究,共1532名受试者。死亡供体移植的证据质量很高,活体供体移植的证据质量很低。与生理盐水相比,DGF与BES相关的相对风险(RR)为0.83(95%可信区间[CI], 0.71-0.96;P = 0.01)。两组在活体供体移植中DGF水平无差异(RR 0.79;95% ci, 0.26-2.41;p = 0.68)。两组患者高钾血症无显著差异(RR 0.87;95% ci, 0.59-1.27;p = 0.46)。结论:与生理盐水相比,BES降低了死亡供肾移植中DGF的风险,且未增加高钾血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balanced Electrolyte Solutions Versus 0.9% Saline for Kidney Transplantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Perioperative intravenous fluids are administered to kidney transplant recipients to maintain hemodynamic stability and graft perfusion; however, the ideal fluid remains uncertain. Although 0.9% saline (saline) is commonly used, its high chloride content causes hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and may increase the risks of delayed graft function (DGF) and hyperkalemia. Balanced electrolyte solutions (BES) have a more physiological chloride concentration and may reduce these risks. Previous meta-analyses found insufficient evidence to compare BES with saline for these outcomes; however, new studies have recently been published. In this updated review, we compared the effects of BES with saline on the risk of DGF and hyperkalemia in kidney transplantation.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing BES with saline in kidney transplantation. The primary outcomes were DGF and hyperkalemia. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and data were pooled for analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results: Ten studies involving 1532 participants were included. The quality of evidence was high for deceased donor transplantation and very low for living donor transplantation. The relative risk (RR) of DGF associated with BES compared with saline was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.96; P = 0.01) in deceased donor transplantation. There was no difference in DGF in living donor transplantation (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.26-2.41; P = 0.68). There was no difference in hyperkalemia between groups (RR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.27; P = 0.46).

Conclusions: Compared with saline, BES reduces the risk of DGF in deceased donor kidney transplantation without increasing hyperkalemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信