Hye Hyeon Moon, Jung Hwan Baek, Sae Rom Chung, Young Jun Choi, Ki-Wook Chung, Tae Yong Kim, Jeong Hyun Lee
{"title":"射频消融治疗累及皮肤的复发性甲状腺癌的疗效和安全性初步报告。","authors":"Hye Hyeon Moon, Jung Hwan Baek, Sae Rom Chung, Young Jun Choi, Ki-Wook Chung, Tae Yong Kim, Jeong Hyun Lee","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective case series study, 43 patients (mean age: 67.9 ± 14.4 years; 31 females) with skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer were treated with RFA for a total of 50 tumors between May 2008 and March 2023. The location of the tumor was classified into epidermis, dermis, or hypodermis on the basis of the involved skin layer. After RFA, the technique efficacy (absence of detectable vasculature and volume reduction at 12 months), clinical success (resolution of symptoms or cosmetic problems), volume reduction ratio (VRR), complete disappearance of tumor, and complications were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 50 recurrent tumors, 9 involved the epidermis, 10 involved the dermis, and 31 involved the hypodermis. A total of 88 RFA sessions (mean, 1.8; range: 1-6) were performed. The technique efficacy at 1 year was 72% (36/50 [confidence interval or CI: 59.6-84.4%]). At the last follow-up (median [interquartile range]: 2.7 [1.1-4.5] years), the clinical success rate was 86% (44/50), the complete disappearance rate 54% (27/50), and the mean VRR 77.3% ± 44.2%. In a subgroup analysis comparing epidermis/dermis vs. hypodermis, there was no statistical difference in technique efficacy (57.9% [11/19] vs. 80.6% [25/31], <i>p</i> = 0.085), clinical success rate (78.9% [15/19] vs. 90.3% [28/31], <i>p</i> = 0.265), complete disappearance rate (42.1% [8/19] vs. 51.6% [16/31], <i>p</i> = 0.541), or mean VRR (65.5% vs. 84.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.141). Skin burns were observed in 4.9% per treatment session (2/41 [CI: 0-11.3%]) of epidermis/dermis-involving tumor procedures and none of the hypodermal tumor procedures. No patients experienced life-threatening or major complications. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> RFA might serve as a promising approach for managing skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer, with no major complications reported in this preliminary study. Recurrent tumors involving the epidermis/dermis may pose a higher risk of skin burns than tumors involving the hypodermis. Early intervention with RFA before the tumor extends to the epidermis/dermis may thus be preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"274-282"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Report Examining Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Skin-Involving Recurrent Thyroid Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Hyeon Moon, Jung Hwan Baek, Sae Rom Chung, Young Jun Choi, Ki-Wook Chung, Tae Yong Kim, Jeong Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/thy.2024.0339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective case series study, 43 patients (mean age: 67.9 ± 14.4 years; 31 females) with skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer were treated with RFA for a total of 50 tumors between May 2008 and March 2023. The location of the tumor was classified into epidermis, dermis, or hypodermis on the basis of the involved skin layer. After RFA, the technique efficacy (absence of detectable vasculature and volume reduction at 12 months), clinical success (resolution of symptoms or cosmetic problems), volume reduction ratio (VRR), complete disappearance of tumor, and complications were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 50 recurrent tumors, 9 involved the epidermis, 10 involved the dermis, and 31 involved the hypodermis. A total of 88 RFA sessions (mean, 1.8; range: 1-6) were performed. The technique efficacy at 1 year was 72% (36/50 [confidence interval or CI: 59.6-84.4%]). At the last follow-up (median [interquartile range]: 2.7 [1.1-4.5] years), the clinical success rate was 86% (44/50), the complete disappearance rate 54% (27/50), and the mean VRR 77.3% ± 44.2%. In a subgroup analysis comparing epidermis/dermis vs. hypodermis, there was no statistical difference in technique efficacy (57.9% [11/19] vs. 80.6% [25/31], <i>p</i> = 0.085), clinical success rate (78.9% [15/19] vs. 90.3% [28/31], <i>p</i> = 0.265), complete disappearance rate (42.1% [8/19] vs. 51.6% [16/31], <i>p</i> = 0.541), or mean VRR (65.5% vs. 84.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.141). Skin burns were observed in 4.9% per treatment session (2/41 [CI: 0-11.3%]) of epidermis/dermis-involving tumor procedures and none of the hypodermal tumor procedures. No patients experienced life-threatening or major complications. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> RFA might serve as a promising approach for managing skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer, with no major complications reported in this preliminary study. Recurrent tumors involving the epidermis/dermis may pose a higher risk of skin burns than tumors involving the hypodermis. Early intervention with RFA before the tumor extends to the epidermis/dermis may thus be preferable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"274-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0339\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0339","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究评估超声(US)引导下射频消融(RFA)治疗累及皮肤的复发性甲状腺癌的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性病例系列研究43例患者(平均年龄:67.9±14.4岁;在2008年5月至2023年3月期间,31名女性患有累及皮肤的复发性甲状腺癌,共50例肿瘤接受了RFA治疗。根据受累的皮肤层,肿瘤的位置分为表皮、真皮层或下皮层。RFA后,评估技术疗效(12个月时未发现血管和体积缩小)、临床成功(症状或美容问题的解决)、体积缩小比(VRR)、肿瘤完全消失和并发症。结果:50例复发肿瘤累及表皮9例,累及真皮10例,累及皮下31例。共88次RFA(平均1.8次;范围:1-6)。1年的技术疗效为72%(36/50[置信区间或CI: 59.6-84.4%])。末次随访(中位数[四分位数间距]2.7[1.1 ~ 4.5]年),临床成功率为86%(44/50),完全消失率为54%(27/50),平均VRR为77.3%±44.2%。在亚组分析中,表皮/真皮与真皮的技术疗效(57.9% [11/19]vs. 80.6% [25/31], p = 0.085)、临床成功率(78.9% [15/19]vs. 90.3% [28/31], p = 0.265)、完全消失率(42.1% [8/19]vs. 51.6% [16/31], p = 0.541)、平均VRR (65.5% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.141)均无统计学差异。在涉及表皮/真皮的肿瘤手术中,每个疗程有4.9%的皮肤烧伤(2/41 [CI: 0-11.3%]),而在涉及皮下肿瘤的手术中没有皮肤烧伤。没有患者出现危及生命或重大并发症。结论:RFA可能是治疗复发性甲状腺癌的一种很有前途的方法,在这项初步研究中没有报道重大并发症。累及表皮/真皮的复发性肿瘤可能比累及皮下的肿瘤造成更高的皮肤烧伤风险。因此,在肿瘤扩散到表皮/真皮层之前进行RFA的早期干预可能是可取的。
Preliminary Report Examining Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Skin-Involving Recurrent Thyroid Cancer.
Background: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer. Methods: In this retrospective case series study, 43 patients (mean age: 67.9 ± 14.4 years; 31 females) with skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer were treated with RFA for a total of 50 tumors between May 2008 and March 2023. The location of the tumor was classified into epidermis, dermis, or hypodermis on the basis of the involved skin layer. After RFA, the technique efficacy (absence of detectable vasculature and volume reduction at 12 months), clinical success (resolution of symptoms or cosmetic problems), volume reduction ratio (VRR), complete disappearance of tumor, and complications were assessed. Results: Of the 50 recurrent tumors, 9 involved the epidermis, 10 involved the dermis, and 31 involved the hypodermis. A total of 88 RFA sessions (mean, 1.8; range: 1-6) were performed. The technique efficacy at 1 year was 72% (36/50 [confidence interval or CI: 59.6-84.4%]). At the last follow-up (median [interquartile range]: 2.7 [1.1-4.5] years), the clinical success rate was 86% (44/50), the complete disappearance rate 54% (27/50), and the mean VRR 77.3% ± 44.2%. In a subgroup analysis comparing epidermis/dermis vs. hypodermis, there was no statistical difference in technique efficacy (57.9% [11/19] vs. 80.6% [25/31], p = 0.085), clinical success rate (78.9% [15/19] vs. 90.3% [28/31], p = 0.265), complete disappearance rate (42.1% [8/19] vs. 51.6% [16/31], p = 0.541), or mean VRR (65.5% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.141). Skin burns were observed in 4.9% per treatment session (2/41 [CI: 0-11.3%]) of epidermis/dermis-involving tumor procedures and none of the hypodermal tumor procedures. No patients experienced life-threatening or major complications. Conclusions: RFA might serve as a promising approach for managing skin-involving recurrent thyroid cancer, with no major complications reported in this preliminary study. Recurrent tumors involving the epidermis/dermis may pose a higher risk of skin burns than tumors involving the hypodermis. Early intervention with RFA before the tumor extends to the epidermis/dermis may thus be preferable.
期刊介绍:
This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes.
Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.