临床因素与癌症患者选择姑息治疗环境之间的关系:一项队列研究的事后分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1177/03008916241301286
Oscar Corli, Luca Porcu, Cristina Bosetti, Angela Recchia, Silvia De Giorgi, Giada Lonati, Barbara Rizzi
{"title":"临床因素与癌症患者选择姑息治疗环境之间的关系:一项队列研究的事后分析。","authors":"Oscar Corli, Luca Porcu, Cristina Bosetti, Angela Recchia, Silvia De Giorgi, Giada Lonati, Barbara Rizzi","doi":"10.1177/03008916241301286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the literature, the data about the factors related to the choice of the setting at patient's first palliative care admission visit are scanty. In fact it seems that the choice between home or hospice care is mainly based on the opinions and needs of patients, families and physicians. This study aims to address the association between the clinical factors detected at the first palliative visit in advanced cancer patients and the choice of palliative care setting (i.e., hospice or home care).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a monocentric, prospective cohort study. A total of 1811 consecutive patients with advanced cancer, admitted to the VIDAS Palliative Care service (hospice/ home care), Milan, Italy in 2018-2020 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the univariate analysis, several clinical comorbidities and physiological deficits were associated with hospice admittance; while patients with more severe symptoms of anxiety, asthenia, depression, and pain were associated with home care admittance. In the multivariate logistic analysis, six clinical factors were associated with the risk of hospice admission: anxiety (OR 0.16), brain metastases (OR 1.67), severe sleep-wake rhythm upset (OR 1.79), bone/vertebral fractures (OR 2.12), intestinal occlusion or sub-occlusion (OR 2.16), and cachexia (OR 2.25). The multivariate cluster analysis confirmed the link observed with the previous statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this analysis showed that some clinical factors were closely related to the chosen palliative care setting and should be taken into consideration a priori to deciding the most appropriate place of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between clinical factors and the choice of palliative care setting among cancer patients: A post-hoc analysis of a cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Corli, Luca Porcu, Cristina Bosetti, Angela Recchia, Silvia De Giorgi, Giada Lonati, Barbara Rizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03008916241301286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the literature, the data about the factors related to the choice of the setting at patient's first palliative care admission visit are scanty. In fact it seems that the choice between home or hospice care is mainly based on the opinions and needs of patients, families and physicians. This study aims to address the association between the clinical factors detected at the first palliative visit in advanced cancer patients and the choice of palliative care setting (i.e., hospice or home care).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a monocentric, prospective cohort study. A total of 1811 consecutive patients with advanced cancer, admitted to the VIDAS Palliative Care service (hospice/ home care), Milan, Italy in 2018-2020 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the univariate analysis, several clinical comorbidities and physiological deficits were associated with hospice admittance; while patients with more severe symptoms of anxiety, asthenia, depression, and pain were associated with home care admittance. In the multivariate logistic analysis, six clinical factors were associated with the risk of hospice admission: anxiety (OR 0.16), brain metastases (OR 1.67), severe sleep-wake rhythm upset (OR 1.79), bone/vertebral fractures (OR 2.12), intestinal occlusion or sub-occlusion (OR 2.16), and cachexia (OR 2.25). The multivariate cluster analysis confirmed the link observed with the previous statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this analysis showed that some clinical factors were closely related to the chosen palliative care setting and should be taken into consideration a priori to deciding the most appropriate place of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tumori\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"79-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tumori\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916241301286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916241301286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:在文献中,关于患者第一次姑息治疗入院时环境选择相关因素的数据很少。事实上,在家庭或临终关怀之间的选择似乎主要是基于患者,家属和医生的意见和需求。本研究旨在探讨晚期癌症患者第一次姑息治疗访视时所检测到的临床因素与选择姑息治疗环境(即安宁疗护或居家疗护)之间的关系。方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。2018-2020年共纳入1811名连续入住意大利米兰VIDAS姑息治疗服务(临终关怀/家庭护理)的晚期癌症患者。结果:在单因素分析中,几种临床合并症和生理缺陷与安宁疗护入院有关;而焦虑、虚弱、抑郁和疼痛症状较严重的患者则与家庭护理有关。在多变量logistic分析中,六个临床因素与安宁疗护入院风险相关:焦虑(OR 0.16)、脑转移(OR 1.67)、严重睡眠-觉醒节律紊乱(OR 1.79)、骨/椎体骨折(OR 2.12)、肠道闭塞或亚闭塞(OR 2.16)和恶病质(OR 2.25)。多变量聚类分析证实了与之前统计分析观察到的联系。结论:本分析结果显示,一些临床因素与选择姑息治疗环境密切相关,在决定最合适的护理场所时应优先考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between clinical factors and the choice of palliative care setting among cancer patients: A post-hoc analysis of a cohort study.

Introduction: In the literature, the data about the factors related to the choice of the setting at patient's first palliative care admission visit are scanty. In fact it seems that the choice between home or hospice care is mainly based on the opinions and needs of patients, families and physicians. This study aims to address the association between the clinical factors detected at the first palliative visit in advanced cancer patients and the choice of palliative care setting (i.e., hospice or home care).

Methods: This is a monocentric, prospective cohort study. A total of 1811 consecutive patients with advanced cancer, admitted to the VIDAS Palliative Care service (hospice/ home care), Milan, Italy in 2018-2020 were included.

Results: In the univariate analysis, several clinical comorbidities and physiological deficits were associated with hospice admittance; while patients with more severe symptoms of anxiety, asthenia, depression, and pain were associated with home care admittance. In the multivariate logistic analysis, six clinical factors were associated with the risk of hospice admission: anxiety (OR 0.16), brain metastases (OR 1.67), severe sleep-wake rhythm upset (OR 1.79), bone/vertebral fractures (OR 2.12), intestinal occlusion or sub-occlusion (OR 2.16), and cachexia (OR 2.25). The multivariate cluster analysis confirmed the link observed with the previous statistical analyses.

Conclusion: The results of this analysis showed that some clinical factors were closely related to the chosen palliative care setting and should be taken into consideration a priori to deciding the most appropriate place of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信