按 SA3 地区分列的 2022 年澳大利亚全科医生服务的批量计费率和自付费用:医疗保险报销数据分析。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Karinna Saxby, Yuting Zhang
{"title":"按 SA3 地区分列的 2022 年澳大利亚全科医生服务的批量计费率和自付费用:医疗保险报销数据分析。","authors":"Karinna Saxby, Yuting Zhang","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine bulk-billing rates and out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner services in Australia at the Statistical Area 3 (SA3) level; to assess differences by area-level socio-economic disadvantage and remoteness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of administrative data (Medicare claims data).</p><p><strong>Setting, participants: </strong>All Medicare claims for non-referred general practitioner services in Australia during the 2022 calendar year, as recorded in the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mean proportions of general practitioner services that were bulk-billed and mean patient out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner visits by SA3 region, adjusted for area-level age and sex, both overall and by area-level socio-economic disadvantage (Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage quintile) and remoteness (simplified Modified Monash Model category).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-83%) of general practitioner services in Australia were bulk-billed; the mean out-of-pocket cost for non-bulk-billed visits was $43 (95% CI, $42-44). By SA3, mean bulk-billing rates ranged between 46% and 99%, mean out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner visit between $16 and $99. Bulk-billing rates were higher in regions in the most socio-economically disadvantaged quintile (86%; 95% CI, 84-88%) than those in the least disadvantaged quintile (73%; 95% CI, 70-76%); the mean rate was not significantly different for remote (86%; 95% CI, 79-92%) and metropolitan areas (81%; 95% CI, 79-83%). Out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner services were higher in remote ($56; 95% CI, $46-66) than in metropolitan areas ($43; 95% CI, $42-44), and lower in areas in the most socio-economically disadvantaged quintile ($42; 95% CI, $40-45) than in those in the least disadvantaged quintile ($47; 95% CI, $45-49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most general practitioner services are bulk-billed, out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed services are relatively high, particularly for people in remote and socio-economically disadvantaged areas of Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bulk-billing rates and out-of-pocket costs for general practitioner services in Australia, 2022, by SA3 region: analysis of Medicare claims data.\",\"authors\":\"Karinna Saxby, Yuting Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine bulk-billing rates and out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner services in Australia at the Statistical Area 3 (SA3) level; to assess differences by area-level socio-economic disadvantage and remoteness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of administrative data (Medicare claims data).</p><p><strong>Setting, participants: </strong>All Medicare claims for non-referred general practitioner services in Australia during the 2022 calendar year, as recorded in the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mean proportions of general practitioner services that were bulk-billed and mean patient out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner visits by SA3 region, adjusted for area-level age and sex, both overall and by area-level socio-economic disadvantage (Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage quintile) and remoteness (simplified Modified Monash Model category).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-83%) of general practitioner services in Australia were bulk-billed; the mean out-of-pocket cost for non-bulk-billed visits was $43 (95% CI, $42-44). By SA3, mean bulk-billing rates ranged between 46% and 99%, mean out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner visit between $16 and $99. Bulk-billing rates were higher in regions in the most socio-economically disadvantaged quintile (86%; 95% CI, 84-88%) than those in the least disadvantaged quintile (73%; 95% CI, 70-76%); the mean rate was not significantly different for remote (86%; 95% CI, 79-92%) and metropolitan areas (81%; 95% CI, 79-83%). Out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner services were higher in remote ($56; 95% CI, $46-66) than in metropolitan areas ($43; 95% CI, $42-44), and lower in areas in the most socio-economically disadvantaged quintile ($42; 95% CI, $40-45) than in those in the least disadvantaged quintile ($47; 95% CI, $45-49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most general practitioner services are bulk-billed, out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed services are relatively high, particularly for people in remote and socio-economically disadvantaged areas of Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52562\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bulk-billing rates and out-of-pocket costs for general practitioner services in Australia, 2022, by SA3 region: analysis of Medicare claims data.

Objectives: To examine bulk-billing rates and out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner services in Australia at the Statistical Area 3 (SA3) level; to assess differences by area-level socio-economic disadvantage and remoteness.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of administrative data (Medicare claims data).

Setting, participants: All Medicare claims for non-referred general practitioner services in Australia during the 2022 calendar year, as recorded in the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA).

Main outcome measures: Mean proportions of general practitioner services that were bulk-billed and mean patient out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner visits by SA3 region, adjusted for area-level age and sex, both overall and by area-level socio-economic disadvantage (Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage quintile) and remoteness (simplified Modified Monash Model category).

Results: During 2022, 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-83%) of general practitioner services in Australia were bulk-billed; the mean out-of-pocket cost for non-bulk-billed visits was $43 (95% CI, $42-44). By SA3, mean bulk-billing rates ranged between 46% and 99%, mean out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner visit between $16 and $99. Bulk-billing rates were higher in regions in the most socio-economically disadvantaged quintile (86%; 95% CI, 84-88%) than those in the least disadvantaged quintile (73%; 95% CI, 70-76%); the mean rate was not significantly different for remote (86%; 95% CI, 79-92%) and metropolitan areas (81%; 95% CI, 79-83%). Out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed general practitioner services were higher in remote ($56; 95% CI, $46-66) than in metropolitan areas ($43; 95% CI, $42-44), and lower in areas in the most socio-economically disadvantaged quintile ($42; 95% CI, $40-45) than in those in the least disadvantaged quintile ($47; 95% CI, $45-49).

Conclusion: Although most general practitioner services are bulk-billed, out-of-pocket costs for non-bulk-billed services are relatively high, particularly for people in remote and socio-economically disadvantaged areas of Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信