Denis Horgan, Paul Hofman, Patrizio Giacomini, France Dube, Jaya Singh, Daniel Schneider, Tanya Hills, Jennifer Faikish, Marc Van Den Bulcke, Umberto Malapelle, Maciej Gajewski, Vivek Subbiah
{"title":"欧洲采用个性化医疗的挑战和障碍:Oncotype DX乳房复发评分®测试的案例","authors":"Denis Horgan, Paul Hofman, Patrizio Giacomini, France Dube, Jaya Singh, Daniel Schneider, Tanya Hills, Jennifer Faikish, Marc Van Den Bulcke, Umberto Malapelle, Maciej Gajewski, Vivek Subbiah","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personalized medicine, aiming to tailor treatments based on individual patient characteristics, holds immense potential in oncology. However, its widespread adoption in Europe faces numerous challenges, as illustrated by the case study of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score<sup>®</sup> assay, a genomic test for breast cancer. This manuscript delineates the multifaceted obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX<sup>®</sup>test (Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test) in Europe from 2004 to 2018. In June 2018, the TAILORx results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:111-21, Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2395-405, and reported that among 6,711 women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and a midrange recurrence score of 11-25 on the Oncotype DX assay, endocrine therapy was not inferior to chemoendocrine therapy, which provides evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy was not beneficial in these patients. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study sheds light on the intricate dynamics influencing the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. This article examines the various obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay in Europe from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study reveals the complex factors that influence the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. By highlighting these challenges, this article offers valuable insights into strategies to facilitate the integration of innovative diagnostic tools into clinical practice across Europe, ultimately leading to improved treatment decision-making for cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and barriers for the adoption of personalized medicine in Europe: the case of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score<sup>®</sup> test.\",\"authors\":\"Denis Horgan, Paul Hofman, Patrizio Giacomini, France Dube, Jaya Singh, Daniel Schneider, Tanya Hills, Jennifer Faikish, Marc Van Den Bulcke, Umberto Malapelle, Maciej Gajewski, Vivek Subbiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2024-0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Personalized medicine, aiming to tailor treatments based on individual patient characteristics, holds immense potential in oncology. However, its widespread adoption in Europe faces numerous challenges, as illustrated by the case study of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score<sup>®</sup> assay, a genomic test for breast cancer. This manuscript delineates the multifaceted obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX<sup>®</sup>test (Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test) in Europe from 2004 to 2018. In June 2018, the TAILORx results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:111-21, Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2395-405, and reported that among 6,711 women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and a midrange recurrence score of 11-25 on the Oncotype DX assay, endocrine therapy was not inferior to chemoendocrine therapy, which provides evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy was not beneficial in these patients. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study sheds light on the intricate dynamics influencing the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. This article examines the various obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay in Europe from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study reveals the complex factors that influence the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. By highlighting these challenges, this article offers valuable insights into strategies to facilitate the integration of innovative diagnostic tools into clinical practice across Europe, ultimately leading to improved treatment decision-making for cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
个性化医疗,旨在根据个体患者的特点定制治疗,在肿瘤学中具有巨大的潜力。然而,它在欧洲的广泛采用面临着许多挑战,正如Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分®检测(乳腺癌基因组检测)的案例研究所说明的那样。本文描述了2004年至2018年在欧洲引入Oncotype DX®测试(Oncotype DX乳腺复发评分测试)期间遇到的多方面障碍。2018年6月,TAILORx的研究结果发表在新英格兰医学杂志上,Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF等人。乳腺癌21基因表达测定指导下的辅助化疗。李建军,张建军,李建军,等。中国生物医学工程杂志,2018;39(3):111-21。临床和基因组风险指导乳腺癌辅助治疗的使用。《中华医学杂志》2019;380:2395-405,并报道了6711例激素受体阳性、her2阴性、淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者,在Oncotype DX检测中,中期复发评分为11-25分,内分泌治疗并不逊于化疗内分泌治疗,这提供了辅助化疗对这些患者无效的证据。通过对临床证据、商业存在、报销机制、指南建议、监管途径和地方经验的综合分析,本研究揭示了影响个性化医疗技术采用的复杂动态。本文探讨了2004年至2018年在欧洲引入Oncotype DX乳腺癌检测期间遇到的各种障碍。通过分析临床证据、商业存在、报销机制、指南建议、监管途径和地方经验,本研究揭示了影响个性化医疗技术采用的复杂因素。通过强调这些挑战,本文提供了有价值的见解,有助于将创新诊断工具整合到整个欧洲的临床实践中,最终改善癌症患者的治疗决策。
Challenges and barriers for the adoption of personalized medicine in Europe: the case of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test.
Personalized medicine, aiming to tailor treatments based on individual patient characteristics, holds immense potential in oncology. However, its widespread adoption in Europe faces numerous challenges, as illustrated by the case study of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay, a genomic test for breast cancer. This manuscript delineates the multifaceted obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX®test (Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test) in Europe from 2004 to 2018. In June 2018, the TAILORx results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:111-21, Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2395-405, and reported that among 6,711 women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and a midrange recurrence score of 11-25 on the Oncotype DX assay, endocrine therapy was not inferior to chemoendocrine therapy, which provides evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy was not beneficial in these patients. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study sheds light on the intricate dynamics influencing the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. This article examines the various obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay in Europe from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study reveals the complex factors that influence the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. By highlighting these challenges, this article offers valuable insights into strategies to facilitate the integration of innovative diagnostic tools into clinical practice across Europe, ultimately leading to improved treatment decision-making for cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality. Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error