Nicola R Young, Luke A Gatta, Sarahn M Wheeler, Jerome J Federspiel, Sarah K Dotters-Katz
{"title":"吲哚美辛和头孢唑林用于体检指示的环切以改善潜伏期-一项方案验证研究。","authors":"Nicola R Young, Luke A Gatta, Sarahn M Wheeler, Jerome J Federspiel, Sarah K Dotters-Katz","doi":"10.1055/a-2502-7225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> A single-center randomized trial showed improved latency with use of indomethacin and cefazolin (I/C) during and following exam-indicated cerclage (EIC). The same center recently published a pre/post comparison demonstrating similar results. This research aimed to validate the protocol in a different setting.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing EIC at a single center between 2013 and 2022. EIC was performed for painless cervical dilation between 16 and 23 weeks' gestation with dilation ≥1 cm. Exposure was defined as receipt of I/C during and following EIC. The primary outcome was latency ≥ 28 days after cerclage placement. Secondary outcomes included latency; gestational age at delivery; delivery ≤ 28 weeks; preterm premature rupture of membranes; intra-amniotic infection (IAI); and median birth weight. Bivariate statistics were used to analyze data; multivariable regression analyses were used to control for confounders (progesterone use, cervical dilation at time of cerclage placement, history of preterm birth, and prolapsing membranes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> EIC was placed in 81 pregnancies and 48 (59%) received I/C. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups, except that prolapsing membranes were significantly less likely in patients receiving I/C (6.2 vs. 21.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Latency ≥ 28 days occurred in 90% of I/C recipients and 82% of the controls (<i>p</i> = 0.32); this difference remained nonsignificant after controlling for confounders (adjusted relative risk: 1.02 [95% confidence interval: 0.85, 1.21]). I/C recipients had lower rates of IAI (4.2 vs. 24.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), even after adjustment (adjusted relative risk: 0.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.74]). Other secondary outcomes did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Use of I/C at the time of EIC at this center was not associated with increased latency to delivery (albeit in a small cohort) but was associated with lower rates of intra-amniotic infection. Larger-scale validation studies would be helpful to confirm the value of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Indomethacin/cefazolin (I/C) increased latency for exam-indicated cerclage in a trial.. · We performed an observational comparison to validate these findings.. · I/C use for exam-indicated cerclages was associated with decreased intra-amniotic infection.. · I/C was not associated with change in latency.. · Larger-scale validation studies needed to confirm the value of intervention..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indomethacin and Cefazolin for Physical Exam-Indicated Cerclage to Improve Latency: A Protocol Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola R Young, Luke A Gatta, Sarahn M Wheeler, Jerome J Federspiel, Sarah K Dotters-Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2502-7225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> A single-center randomized trial showed improved latency with use of indomethacin and cefazolin (I/C) during and following exam-indicated cerclage (EIC). The same center recently published a pre/post comparison demonstrating similar results. This research aimed to validate the protocol in a different setting.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing EIC at a single center between 2013 and 2022. EIC was performed for painless cervical dilation between 16 and 23 weeks' gestation with dilation ≥1 cm. Exposure was defined as receipt of I/C during and following EIC. The primary outcome was latency ≥ 28 days after cerclage placement. Secondary outcomes included latency; gestational age at delivery; delivery ≤ 28 weeks; preterm premature rupture of membranes; intra-amniotic infection (IAI); and median birth weight. Bivariate statistics were used to analyze data; multivariable regression analyses were used to control for confounders (progesterone use, cervical dilation at time of cerclage placement, history of preterm birth, and prolapsing membranes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> EIC was placed in 81 pregnancies and 48 (59%) received I/C. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups, except that prolapsing membranes were significantly less likely in patients receiving I/C (6.2 vs. 21.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Latency ≥ 28 days occurred in 90% of I/C recipients and 82% of the controls (<i>p</i> = 0.32); this difference remained nonsignificant after controlling for confounders (adjusted relative risk: 1.02 [95% confidence interval: 0.85, 1.21]). I/C recipients had lower rates of IAI (4.2 vs. 24.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), even after adjustment (adjusted relative risk: 0.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.74]). Other secondary outcomes did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Use of I/C at the time of EIC at this center was not associated with increased latency to delivery (albeit in a small cohort) but was associated with lower rates of intra-amniotic infection. Larger-scale validation studies would be helpful to confirm the value of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Indomethacin/cefazolin (I/C) increased latency for exam-indicated cerclage in a trial.. · We performed an observational comparison to validate these findings.. · I/C use for exam-indicated cerclages was associated with decreased intra-amniotic infection.. · I/C was not associated with change in latency.. · Larger-scale validation studies needed to confirm the value of intervention..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2502-7225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2502-7225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:一项单中心随机试验显示,使用吲哚美辛和头孢唑林(I/C)可改善检查指示性环切术(EIC)期间和之后的潜伏期。该中心最近发表了一份前后对比报告,显示了类似的结果。这项研究的目的是在不同的环境下验证该方案。研究设计:2013年至2022年间在单一中心接受EIC的单胎妊娠回顾性队列研究。妊娠16 ~ 23周宫颈扩张≥1cm无痛宫颈扩张行EIC。暴露被定义为在EIC期间和之后收到I/C。主要终点是环扎置入后潜伏期≥28天。次要结局包括潜伏期;分娩时的胎龄;产期≤28周;早产胎膜破裂(PPROM);羊膜内感染;出生体重中位数。采用双变量统计对数据进行分析;采用多变量回归分析来控制混杂因素(黄体酮使用、环扎术时宫颈扩张、PTB病史和膜脱垂)。结果:81例妊娠行EIC, 48例(59%)行I/C。各组之间的基线特征没有差异,除了接受I/C的患者脱垂膜的可能性显着降低(6.2% vs. 21.2%;p = 0.04)。90%的I/C受体和82%的对照组出现潜伏期≥28天(p=0.32);在控制混杂因素后,这一差异仍然不显著(校正相对风险:1.02[95%置信区间:0.85,1.21])。即使经过调整(调整后的相对危险度:0.18[95%可信区间:0.04,0.74]),I/C患者的IAI发生率也较低(4.2 vs. 24.2%, p=0.007)。其他次要结果没有差异。结论:在该中心检查指示的环切术中使用吲哚美辛/头孢唑林与分娩延迟增加无关(尽管在一个小队列中),但与较低的羊膜内感染发生率相关。更大规模的验证研究将有助于确认这种干预措施的价值。
Indomethacin and Cefazolin for Physical Exam-Indicated Cerclage to Improve Latency: A Protocol Validation Study.
Objective: A single-center randomized trial showed improved latency with use of indomethacin and cefazolin (I/C) during and following exam-indicated cerclage (EIC). The same center recently published a pre/post comparison demonstrating similar results. This research aimed to validate the protocol in a different setting.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing EIC at a single center between 2013 and 2022. EIC was performed for painless cervical dilation between 16 and 23 weeks' gestation with dilation ≥1 cm. Exposure was defined as receipt of I/C during and following EIC. The primary outcome was latency ≥ 28 days after cerclage placement. Secondary outcomes included latency; gestational age at delivery; delivery ≤ 28 weeks; preterm premature rupture of membranes; intra-amniotic infection (IAI); and median birth weight. Bivariate statistics were used to analyze data; multivariable regression analyses were used to control for confounders (progesterone use, cervical dilation at time of cerclage placement, history of preterm birth, and prolapsing membranes).
Results: EIC was placed in 81 pregnancies and 48 (59%) received I/C. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups, except that prolapsing membranes were significantly less likely in patients receiving I/C (6.2 vs. 21.2%; p = 0.04). Latency ≥ 28 days occurred in 90% of I/C recipients and 82% of the controls (p = 0.32); this difference remained nonsignificant after controlling for confounders (adjusted relative risk: 1.02 [95% confidence interval: 0.85, 1.21]). I/C recipients had lower rates of IAI (4.2 vs. 24.2%, p = 0.007), even after adjustment (adjusted relative risk: 0.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.74]). Other secondary outcomes did not differ.
Conclusion: Use of I/C at the time of EIC at this center was not associated with increased latency to delivery (albeit in a small cohort) but was associated with lower rates of intra-amniotic infection. Larger-scale validation studies would be helpful to confirm the value of this intervention.
Key points: · Indomethacin/cefazolin (I/C) increased latency for exam-indicated cerclage in a trial.. · We performed an observational comparison to validate these findings.. · I/C use for exam-indicated cerclages was associated with decreased intra-amniotic infection.. · I/C was not associated with change in latency.. · Larger-scale validation studies needed to confirm the value of intervention..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.