基于线路模型识别和相关性比较的单相接地连续故障馈线检测

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Jiawei Yuan;Chuan Feng;Yueming Ji;Xintong Liu;Xuan Dong;Jun Liu;Zaibin Jiao
{"title":"基于线路模型识别和相关性比较的单相接地连续故障馈线检测","authors":"Jiawei Yuan;Chuan Feng;Yueming Ji;Xintong Liu;Xuan Dong;Jun Liu;Zaibin Jiao","doi":"10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3517836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a single phase-to-ground (SPG) fault occurs in distribution networks, the over-voltages in non-fault phases may cause insulation damage to entire networks, potentially leading to a secondary SPG fault in feeders. Existing detection methods fail to explore the underlying mechanisms of SPG faults, resulting in unsatisfactory detection performance in practical applications. Moreover, they cannot identify the second faulty feeder under successive SPG (SSPG) faults, thereby increasing the risks of bushfires and casualties. This paper proposes a faulty-feeder detection method for SSPG faults based on line model recognition and correlation comparison. Firstly, the fault characteristics under SPG and SSPG faults are analyzed, revealing that differences in the equivalent line models are essential for distinguishing between faulty and healthy feeders. Secondly, the derivative of zero-sequence voltage reflecting the capacitance characteristics is compared with the measured zero-sequence currents from the perspectives of similarity and distance. The first faulty feeder is detected using cosine similarity comparison, while the second faulty feeder is identified using Euclidean distance comparison. Thirdly, a comprehensive detection criterion is constructed based on the cooperation of the similarity comparison method and distance comparison method. The feasibility and applicability are verified using various simulation data, field tests, and practical data tests.","PeriodicalId":13498,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","volume":"40 2","pages":"750-763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faulty Feeder Detection for Successive Single Phase-to-Ground Faults Based on Line Model Recognition and Correlation Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Yuan;Chuan Feng;Yueming Ji;Xintong Liu;Xuan Dong;Jun Liu;Zaibin Jiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3517836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When a single phase-to-ground (SPG) fault occurs in distribution networks, the over-voltages in non-fault phases may cause insulation damage to entire networks, potentially leading to a secondary SPG fault in feeders. Existing detection methods fail to explore the underlying mechanisms of SPG faults, resulting in unsatisfactory detection performance in practical applications. Moreover, they cannot identify the second faulty feeder under successive SPG (SSPG) faults, thereby increasing the risks of bushfires and casualties. This paper proposes a faulty-feeder detection method for SSPG faults based on line model recognition and correlation comparison. Firstly, the fault characteristics under SPG and SSPG faults are analyzed, revealing that differences in the equivalent line models are essential for distinguishing between faulty and healthy feeders. Secondly, the derivative of zero-sequence voltage reflecting the capacitance characteristics is compared with the measured zero-sequence currents from the perspectives of similarity and distance. The first faulty feeder is detected using cosine similarity comparison, while the second faulty feeder is identified using Euclidean distance comparison. Thirdly, a comprehensive detection criterion is constructed based on the cooperation of the similarity comparison method and distance comparison method. The feasibility and applicability are verified using various simulation data, field tests, and practical data tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"750-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10803106/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10803106/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当配电网发生单相接地故障时,非故障相的过电压可能会导致整个电网的绝缘损坏,从而可能导致馈线发生二次单相接地故障。现有的检测方法未能探究SPG故障的潜在机制,导致实际应用中的检测性能不理想。此外,他们无法识别连续SPG (SSPG)故障下的第二个故障馈线,从而增加了森林火灾和人员伤亡的风险。提出了一种基于线模型识别和相关性比较的SSPG馈线故障检测方法。首先,分析了SPG和SSPG故障下的故障特征,揭示了等效线路模型的差异是区分故障馈线和健康馈线的关键。其次,从相似度和距离的角度对反映电容特性的零序电压导数与实测零序电流进行比较。采用余弦相似度比较检测第一个馈线故障,采用欧氏距离比较识别第二个馈线故障。第三,结合相似比较法和距离比较法,构建了一种综合的检测准则。通过各种模拟数据、现场试验和实际数据试验,验证了该方法的可行性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faulty Feeder Detection for Successive Single Phase-to-Ground Faults Based on Line Model Recognition and Correlation Comparison
When a single phase-to-ground (SPG) fault occurs in distribution networks, the over-voltages in non-fault phases may cause insulation damage to entire networks, potentially leading to a secondary SPG fault in feeders. Existing detection methods fail to explore the underlying mechanisms of SPG faults, resulting in unsatisfactory detection performance in practical applications. Moreover, they cannot identify the second faulty feeder under successive SPG (SSPG) faults, thereby increasing the risks of bushfires and casualties. This paper proposes a faulty-feeder detection method for SSPG faults based on line model recognition and correlation comparison. Firstly, the fault characteristics under SPG and SSPG faults are analyzed, revealing that differences in the equivalent line models are essential for distinguishing between faulty and healthy feeders. Secondly, the derivative of zero-sequence voltage reflecting the capacitance characteristics is compared with the measured zero-sequence currents from the perspectives of similarity and distance. The first faulty feeder is detected using cosine similarity comparison, while the second faulty feeder is identified using Euclidean distance comparison. Thirdly, a comprehensive detection criterion is constructed based on the cooperation of the similarity comparison method and distance comparison method. The feasibility and applicability are verified using various simulation data, field tests, and practical data tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The scope of the Society embraces planning, research, development, design, application, construction, installation and operation of apparatus, equipment, structures, materials and systems for the safe, reliable and economic generation, transmission, distribution, conversion, measurement and control of electric energy. It includes the developing of engineering standards, the providing of information and instruction to the public and to legislators, as well as technical scientific, literary, educational and other activities that contribute to the electric power discipline or utilize the techniques or products within this discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信