比较三种革兰氏染色制备方法的菌体回收率和染色性能。

Audrey Pisahl, Martha Timmons, Sheila Criswell
{"title":"比较三种革兰氏染色制备方法的菌体回收率和染色性能。","authors":"Audrey Pisahl, Martha Timmons, Sheila Criswell","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One possible way to improve accuracy of blood culture Gram stain analyses is increasing the concentration of organisms on the slide prepared from the blood culture broth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From each positive blood culture bottle, 1 direct smear, a 1-drop concentrated preparation, and 1 cytospin/cytofuge preparation were Gram stained and evaluated. There were 2 evaluators who ranked the 3 preparations from most to fewest organisms seen. Each preparation was also scored as acceptable or unacceptable for both organism and background stain quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-drop slide exhibited the highest concentration of organisms compared with both the cytospin and direct smear but presented frequent difficulties with interpretation of Gram staining acceptability with both the background and the organisms. Although cytospin preparations are known to concentrate liquid specimens, the current study found no enrichment of microorganisms over the direct smear preparation. The cytospin was, however, advantageous for enhancing organism morphology by creating a monolayer of elements and reducing background artifacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 1-drop preparation is simple, inexpensive, and effective at increasing organism concentration for analysis, making it a good option when processing culture bottles with low organism loads, but more investigation into methods of improving stain quality is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of organism recovery and staining properties for 3 methods of Gram stain preparation.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Pisahl, Martha Timmons, Sheila Criswell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmae095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One possible way to improve accuracy of blood culture Gram stain analyses is increasing the concentration of organisms on the slide prepared from the blood culture broth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From each positive blood culture bottle, 1 direct smear, a 1-drop concentrated preparation, and 1 cytospin/cytofuge preparation were Gram stained and evaluated. There were 2 evaluators who ranked the 3 preparations from most to fewest organisms seen. Each preparation was also scored as acceptable or unacceptable for both organism and background stain quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-drop slide exhibited the highest concentration of organisms compared with both the cytospin and direct smear but presented frequent difficulties with interpretation of Gram staining acceptability with both the background and the organisms. Although cytospin preparations are known to concentrate liquid specimens, the current study found no enrichment of microorganisms over the direct smear preparation. The cytospin was, however, advantageous for enhancing organism morphology by creating a monolayer of elements and reducing background artifacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 1-drop preparation is simple, inexpensive, and effective at increasing organism concentration for analysis, making it a good option when processing culture bottles with low organism loads, but more investigation into methods of improving stain quality is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提高血培养革兰氏染色分析准确性的一个可行方法是增加血培养液制备的载玻片上的菌体浓度:方法:对每个阳性血培养瓶中的 1 份直接涂片、1 滴浓缩制备物和 1 份细胞悬液/细胞液制备物进行革兰氏染色和评估。由 2 名评估员对 3 种制备物进行排名,从最多生物到最少生物。每种制剂的生物体和背景染色质量也被评为可接受或不可接受:结果:与细胞涂片和直接涂片相比,1 滴玻片的生物浓度最高,但在解释革兰氏染色的背景和生物可接受性时经常遇到困难。虽然众所周知细胞嵴制备方法会浓缩液体标本,但本研究发现,与直接涂片制备方法相比,细胞嵴制备方法并没有富集微生物。不过,细胞匀浆制备法通过形成单层元素和减少背景伪影,在增强生物形态方面具有优势:一滴法制备简单、成本低廉,且能有效提高分析所用的生物浓度,因此在处理生物负荷较低的培养瓶时是一个不错的选择,但有必要对提高染色质量的方法进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of organism recovery and staining properties for 3 methods of Gram stain preparation.

Background: One possible way to improve accuracy of blood culture Gram stain analyses is increasing the concentration of organisms on the slide prepared from the blood culture broth.

Methods: From each positive blood culture bottle, 1 direct smear, a 1-drop concentrated preparation, and 1 cytospin/cytofuge preparation were Gram stained and evaluated. There were 2 evaluators who ranked the 3 preparations from most to fewest organisms seen. Each preparation was also scored as acceptable or unacceptable for both organism and background stain quality.

Results: The 1-drop slide exhibited the highest concentration of organisms compared with both the cytospin and direct smear but presented frequent difficulties with interpretation of Gram staining acceptability with both the background and the organisms. Although cytospin preparations are known to concentrate liquid specimens, the current study found no enrichment of microorganisms over the direct smear preparation. The cytospin was, however, advantageous for enhancing organism morphology by creating a monolayer of elements and reducing background artifacts.

Conclusion: The 1-drop preparation is simple, inexpensive, and effective at increasing organism concentration for analysis, making it a good option when processing culture bottles with low organism loads, but more investigation into methods of improving stain quality is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信