Ermes Carulli, Suzy Browne, Sara Woolley, Alexander Tindale, Alison Pottle, Kate Nagle, Rebecca Lane, Navin Chandra, Niket Patel, Rodney De Palma, Gareth Barnes, Tito Kabir, Vasileios Panoulas, David Smith, Robert Smith, Sharon Clernon, Ee Ling Heng, Mohammed Akhtar, Mark Bowers, Ian McGovern, Thomas Lüscher, Miles Dalby
{"title":"在经导管主动脉瓣植入术前,通过专用路径和调查问卷实施和评估共同决策。","authors":"Ermes Carulli, Suzy Browne, Sara Woolley, Alexander Tindale, Alison Pottle, Kate Nagle, Rebecca Lane, Navin Chandra, Niket Patel, Rodney De Palma, Gareth Barnes, Tito Kabir, Vasileios Panoulas, David Smith, Robert Smith, Sharon Clernon, Ee Ling Heng, Mohammed Akhtar, Mark Bowers, Ian McGovern, Thomas Lüscher, Miles Dalby","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice between TAVI, surgery, or a conservative approach should be based upon multiple factors including clinical considerations, technical feasibility, and informed patient preference. In this context, engaging patients in a shared decision-making (SDM) process becomes essential, but this practice is generally underused.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>To comply with the European and UK national guidelines, in January 2023 we established a structured SDM pathway in which patients are offered virtual/physical decision aids and after 1 week are invited to a meeting to reach a shared decision. From December 2022 to June 2023, a custom-developed questionnaire was prospectively administered to 23 patients prior to, and 38 patients after, the implementation of the SDM pathway. The answers to 12 core questions were recorded on a Likert scale (1-5). Global satisfaction, as measured by mean Likert score, was significantly higher for the post-SDM group than for the pre-SDM group (4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The percentage of positive (Likert 4-5) responses was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (289/312, 92.6% vs. 155/234, 66.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The percentage of negative (Likert 1-2) responses was significantly lower in the post-SDM group (5/312, 1.6% vs. 53/234, 22.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SDM pathway proved effective in delivering SDM in compliance with national and international guidance. A similar approach leveraging digital technology to minimize cost and enhance patient convenience could be implemented for other treatments and across other institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 6","pages":"oeae095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Ermes Carulli, Suzy Browne, Sara Woolley, Alexander Tindale, Alison Pottle, Kate Nagle, Rebecca Lane, Navin Chandra, Niket Patel, Rodney De Palma, Gareth Barnes, Tito Kabir, Vasileios Panoulas, David Smith, Robert Smith, Sharon Clernon, Ee Ling Heng, Mohammed Akhtar, Mark Bowers, Ian McGovern, Thomas Lüscher, Miles Dalby\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice between TAVI, surgery, or a conservative approach should be based upon multiple factors including clinical considerations, technical feasibility, and informed patient preference. In this context, engaging patients in a shared decision-making (SDM) process becomes essential, but this practice is generally underused.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>To comply with the European and UK national guidelines, in January 2023 we established a structured SDM pathway in which patients are offered virtual/physical decision aids and after 1 week are invited to a meeting to reach a shared decision. From December 2022 to June 2023, a custom-developed questionnaire was prospectively administered to 23 patients prior to, and 38 patients after, the implementation of the SDM pathway. The answers to 12 core questions were recorded on a Likert scale (1-5). Global satisfaction, as measured by mean Likert score, was significantly higher for the post-SDM group than for the pre-SDM group (4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The percentage of positive (Likert 4-5) responses was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (289/312, 92.6% vs. 155/234, 66.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The percentage of negative (Likert 1-2) responses was significantly lower in the post-SDM group (5/312, 1.6% vs. 53/234, 22.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SDM pathway proved effective in delivering SDM in compliance with national and international guidance. A similar approach leveraging digital technology to minimize cost and enhance patient convenience could be implemented for other treatments and across other institutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"oeae095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.
Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice between TAVI, surgery, or a conservative approach should be based upon multiple factors including clinical considerations, technical feasibility, and informed patient preference. In this context, engaging patients in a shared decision-making (SDM) process becomes essential, but this practice is generally underused.
Methods and results: To comply with the European and UK national guidelines, in January 2023 we established a structured SDM pathway in which patients are offered virtual/physical decision aids and after 1 week are invited to a meeting to reach a shared decision. From December 2022 to June 2023, a custom-developed questionnaire was prospectively administered to 23 patients prior to, and 38 patients after, the implementation of the SDM pathway. The answers to 12 core questions were recorded on a Likert scale (1-5). Global satisfaction, as measured by mean Likert score, was significantly higher for the post-SDM group than for the pre-SDM group (4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30, P < 0.001). The percentage of positive (Likert 4-5) responses was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (289/312, 92.6% vs. 155/234, 66.2%, P < 0.001). The percentage of negative (Likert 1-2) responses was significantly lower in the post-SDM group (5/312, 1.6% vs. 53/234, 22.6%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The SDM pathway proved effective in delivering SDM in compliance with national and international guidance. A similar approach leveraging digital technology to minimize cost and enhance patient convenience could be implemented for other treatments and across other institutions.