为农村退伍军人实施远程老年保健:影响护理模式的因素。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1221899
Christine E Gould, Lynsay Paiko, Chalise Carlson, Marika Blair Humber, Ranak Trivedi, Julie Filips, A Denise Savell, Althea Lloyd, Amanda D Peeples
{"title":"为农村退伍军人实施远程老年保健:影响护理模式的因素。","authors":"Christine E Gould, Lynsay Paiko, Chalise Carlson, Marika Blair Humber, Ranak Trivedi, Julie Filips, A Denise Savell, Althea Lloyd, Amanda D Peeples","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1221899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aging rural veterans have limited access to geriatric mental health services. The establishment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regional telehealth hubs, or Clinical Resource Hubs (CRHs), has the potential to improve access to specialist care via telehealth delivered across healthcare systems within each VHA region. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 1.0) to examine variations in the tele-geriatric mental health (tele-GMH) care models being used in four CRHs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 11 CRH geriatric mental health providers and 12 leaders to (1) characterize the models of care, (2) identify factors in their region that support tele-GMH, (3) identify factors underlying model adaptations, and (4) learn about barriers and facilitators during implementation. The interviews were analyzed using a combination of CFIR-based coding and rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The services used multiple telehealth modalities; their care delivery approach ranged from consultative to continuity services. Aspects of the inner setting, specifically structural characteristics, implementation climate, and implementation readiness, influenced the model that each CRH implemented. Barriers were largely related to inner setting structural characteristics. Facilitators highlighted the importance of planning, iteration, and engaging stakeholders during implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tele-GMH models varied in approach, tailoring their services to fit inner setting characteristics. Barriers and facilitators remained consistent across regions. Attending to inner setting characteristics, ongoing process improvement, and nurturing relationships with stakeholders is critical throughout the implementation of a tele-GMH program. Future research should examine the impact of the varied care delivery models on quantitative outcomes, including metrics related to access and healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1221899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of tele-geriatricmental healthcare for rural veterans: factors influencing care models.\",\"authors\":\"Christine E Gould, Lynsay Paiko, Chalise Carlson, Marika Blair Humber, Ranak Trivedi, Julie Filips, A Denise Savell, Althea Lloyd, Amanda D Peeples\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2024.1221899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aging rural veterans have limited access to geriatric mental health services. The establishment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regional telehealth hubs, or Clinical Resource Hubs (CRHs), has the potential to improve access to specialist care via telehealth delivered across healthcare systems within each VHA region. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 1.0) to examine variations in the tele-geriatric mental health (tele-GMH) care models being used in four CRHs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 11 CRH geriatric mental health providers and 12 leaders to (1) characterize the models of care, (2) identify factors in their region that support tele-GMH, (3) identify factors underlying model adaptations, and (4) learn about barriers and facilitators during implementation. The interviews were analyzed using a combination of CFIR-based coding and rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The services used multiple telehealth modalities; their care delivery approach ranged from consultative to continuity services. Aspects of the inner setting, specifically structural characteristics, implementation climate, and implementation readiness, influenced the model that each CRH implemented. Barriers were largely related to inner setting structural characteristics. Facilitators highlighted the importance of planning, iteration, and engaging stakeholders during implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tele-GMH models varied in approach, tailoring their services to fit inner setting characteristics. Barriers and facilitators remained consistent across regions. Attending to inner setting characteristics, ongoing process improvement, and nurturing relationships with stakeholders is critical throughout the implementation of a tele-GMH program. Future research should examine the impact of the varied care delivery models on quantitative outcomes, including metrics related to access and healthcare utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1221899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1221899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1221899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:农村老龄退伍军人获得老年心理健康服务的机会有限。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)地区远程医疗中心或临床资源中心(CRHs)的建立有可能通过在每个退伍军人健康管理局地区内的医疗保健系统之间提供远程医疗来改善专科医疗服务的可及性。我们使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR 1.0)检查了四个 CRHs 正在使用的远程老年精神健康(tele-GMH)护理模式的差异:我们采访了 11 位 CRH 老年精神健康服务提供者和 12 位领导者,目的是:(1)描述护理模式的特点;(2)确定其所在地区支持远程-老年精神健康的因素;(3)确定模式调整的基本因素;(4)了解实施过程中的障碍和促进因素。访谈采用基于 CFIR 的编码和快速定性分析相结合的方法进行分析:结果:这些服务使用了多种远程医疗模式;其医疗服务方式从咨询到连续性服务不等。内部环境的各个方面,特别是结构特征、实施氛围和实施准备情况,影响着每家 CRH 实施的模式。障碍主要与内部环境的结构特征有关。促进者强调了规划、迭代以及在实施过程中让利益相关者参与的重要性:远程医疗模式在方法上各不相同,其服务都是根据内部环境的特点量身定制的。各地区的障碍和促进因素保持一致。在实施远程医疗保健计划的整个过程中,关注内部环境特征、持续改进流程以及培养与利益相关者的关系至关重要。未来的研究应考察不同的医疗服务模式对量化结果的影响,包括与就医和医疗服务利用率相关的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of tele-geriatricmental healthcare for rural veterans: factors influencing care models.

Introduction: Aging rural veterans have limited access to geriatric mental health services. The establishment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regional telehealth hubs, or Clinical Resource Hubs (CRHs), has the potential to improve access to specialist care via telehealth delivered across healthcare systems within each VHA region. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 1.0) to examine variations in the tele-geriatric mental health (tele-GMH) care models being used in four CRHs.

Methods: We interviewed 11 CRH geriatric mental health providers and 12 leaders to (1) characterize the models of care, (2) identify factors in their region that support tele-GMH, (3) identify factors underlying model adaptations, and (4) learn about barriers and facilitators during implementation. The interviews were analyzed using a combination of CFIR-based coding and rapid qualitative analysis.

Results: The services used multiple telehealth modalities; their care delivery approach ranged from consultative to continuity services. Aspects of the inner setting, specifically structural characteristics, implementation climate, and implementation readiness, influenced the model that each CRH implemented. Barriers were largely related to inner setting structural characteristics. Facilitators highlighted the importance of planning, iteration, and engaging stakeholders during implementation.

Conclusion: Tele-GMH models varied in approach, tailoring their services to fit inner setting characteristics. Barriers and facilitators remained consistent across regions. Attending to inner setting characteristics, ongoing process improvement, and nurturing relationships with stakeholders is critical throughout the implementation of a tele-GMH program. Future research should examine the impact of the varied care delivery models on quantitative outcomes, including metrics related to access and healthcare utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信