背阔肌与大圆肌肌腱转移恢复下肢麻痹患者肩关节外旋的比较。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Ashraf M Abdelaziz, Mohamed Ahmed Abdelfath, Mahmoud Ali Ismail, Yaser El Sayed Hassan Wahd, Abdelaziz Monsef Ali, Tharwat Al Akeed
{"title":"背阔肌与大圆肌肌腱转移恢复下肢麻痹患者肩关节外旋的比较。","authors":"Ashraf M Abdelaziz, Mohamed Ahmed Abdelfath, Mahmoud Ali Ismail, Yaser El Sayed Hassan Wahd, Abdelaziz Monsef Ali, Tharwat Al Akeed","doi":"10.1142/S242483552550016X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The transfer of latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) have been described for restoration of external rotation (ER) and shoulder abduction in neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP). The aim of this prospective randomised study is to compare the outcomes of LD versus TM transfer in the treatment of internal rotation contracture of the shoulder in children with NBPP. <b>Methods:</b> The study was conducted from February 2014 to January 2018 and included NBPP patients with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder. Patients were randomised to either LD (Group 1) or TM (Group 2) tendon transfer. Patients were followed up for at least 38 months and assessed for improvements in the arc of shoulder abduction and ER. <b>Results:</b> The study included 30 patients with 15 patients randomised to each group respectively. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 15) included 4 boys and 11 girls with a mean age of 2 years and 8 months (range: 1.5-5) and a mean follow-up of 62 months (range: 38-68). Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 15) included 6 boys and 9 girls with a mean age of 2 years and 6 months (range: 1.5-4.8) and a mean follow-up of 58 months (range: 38-68). All patients showed improvement in shoulder abduction and active and passive ER. There were no differences in shoulder abduction (<i>p</i> = 0.467), active ER (<i>p</i> = 0.124) and passive ER (<i>p</i> = 0.756) between both groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both LD and TM tendon transfers improved shoulder function in NBPP patients with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level II (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Latissimus Dorsi versus Teres Major Tendon Transfer to Restore External Rotation of the Shoulder in Patients with Erb Palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Ashraf M Abdelaziz, Mohamed Ahmed Abdelfath, Mahmoud Ali Ismail, Yaser El Sayed Hassan Wahd, Abdelaziz Monsef Ali, Tharwat Al Akeed\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S242483552550016X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The transfer of latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) have been described for restoration of external rotation (ER) and shoulder abduction in neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP). The aim of this prospective randomised study is to compare the outcomes of LD versus TM transfer in the treatment of internal rotation contracture of the shoulder in children with NBPP. <b>Methods:</b> The study was conducted from February 2014 to January 2018 and included NBPP patients with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder. Patients were randomised to either LD (Group 1) or TM (Group 2) tendon transfer. Patients were followed up for at least 38 months and assessed for improvements in the arc of shoulder abduction and ER. <b>Results:</b> The study included 30 patients with 15 patients randomised to each group respectively. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 15) included 4 boys and 11 girls with a mean age of 2 years and 8 months (range: 1.5-5) and a mean follow-up of 62 months (range: 38-68). Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 15) included 6 boys and 9 girls with a mean age of 2 years and 6 months (range: 1.5-4.8) and a mean follow-up of 58 months (range: 38-68). All patients showed improvement in shoulder abduction and active and passive ER. There were no differences in shoulder abduction (<i>p</i> = 0.467), active ER (<i>p</i> = 0.124) and passive ER (<i>p</i> = 0.756) between both groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both LD and TM tendon transfers improved shoulder function in NBPP patients with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level II (Therapeutic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"55-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S242483552550016X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S242483552550016X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在新生儿臂丛神经麻痹(NBPP)患者中,背阔肌(LD)和大圆肌(TM)的转移可用于恢复外旋(ER)和肩外展。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较 LD 与 TM 转移在治疗 NBPP 儿童肩关节内旋挛缩方面的效果。研究方法研究于 2014 年 2 月至 2018 年 1 月进行,纳入了肩关节内旋挛缩的 NBPP 患者。患者随机接受 LD(第 1 组)或 TM(第 2 组)肌腱转移治疗。对患者进行至少 38 个月的随访,并评估患者肩关节外展弧度和内旋弧度的改善情况。研究结果该研究包括30名患者,每组各随机分配15名患者。第一组(n = 15)包括 4 名男孩和 11 名女孩,平均年龄为 2 岁零 8 个月(范围:1.5-5),平均随访时间为 62 个月(范围:38-68)。第二组(n = 15)包括 6 名男孩和 9 名女孩,平均年龄为 2 岁 6 个月(范围:1.5-4.8),平均随访时间为 58 个月(范围:38-68)。所有患者的肩关节外展、主动和被动肱二头肌功能均有改善。两组患者在肩关节外展(p = 0.467)、主动内收(p = 0.124)和被动内收(p = 0.756)方面没有差异。结论LD和TM肌腱转移术均可改善肩关节内旋挛缩的NBPP患者的肩关节功能。证据等级:二级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Latissimus Dorsi versus Teres Major Tendon Transfer to Restore External Rotation of the Shoulder in Patients with Erb Palsy.

Background: The transfer of latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) have been described for restoration of external rotation (ER) and shoulder abduction in neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP). The aim of this prospective randomised study is to compare the outcomes of LD versus TM transfer in the treatment of internal rotation contracture of the shoulder in children with NBPP. Methods: The study was conducted from February 2014 to January 2018 and included NBPP patients with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder. Patients were randomised to either LD (Group 1) or TM (Group 2) tendon transfer. Patients were followed up for at least 38 months and assessed for improvements in the arc of shoulder abduction and ER. Results: The study included 30 patients with 15 patients randomised to each group respectively. Group 1 (n = 15) included 4 boys and 11 girls with a mean age of 2 years and 8 months (range: 1.5-5) and a mean follow-up of 62 months (range: 38-68). Group 2 (n = 15) included 6 boys and 9 girls with a mean age of 2 years and 6 months (range: 1.5-4.8) and a mean follow-up of 58 months (range: 38-68). All patients showed improvement in shoulder abduction and active and passive ER. There were no differences in shoulder abduction (p = 0.467), active ER (p = 0.124) and passive ER (p = 0.756) between both groups. Conclusions: Both LD and TM tendon transfers improved shoulder function in NBPP patients with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信