Maria Weinkouff Pedersen, Riina Oksjoki, Jacob Eifer Møller, Anna Gundlund, Emil Fosbøl, Dorte Guldbrand Nielsen, Lars Køber, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Peter Søgaard, Niels Holmark Andersen, Kristian Kragholm
{"title":"急性主动脉夹层后入住养老院和开始家庭护理:一项基于全国登记的队列研究。","authors":"Maria Weinkouff Pedersen, Riina Oksjoki, Jacob Eifer Møller, Anna Gundlund, Emil Fosbøl, Dorte Guldbrand Nielsen, Lars Køber, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Peter Søgaard, Niels Holmark Andersen, Kristian Kragholm","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-23-8366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about long-term outcomes beyond survival following acute aortic dissection. The aim of this research was to evaluate rates of home care initiation and nursing home admission during the first year after discharge and to assess factors associated with these needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection type A or B between 2006 and 2015 were identified using national registries. Patients discharged alive without nursing home or home care use before aortic dissection were included, along with age-matched and sex-matched population controls without aortic dissection (at a ratio of 1:5). Cause-specific multivariable Cox regression was used to derive adjusted hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 1093 patients and 5465 control individuals with a median (IQR) age of 64 (55-71) years; 70.6% were men. During their hospital stay, 2.7% of patients were registered with a first-time diagnosis of stroke, 7.1% with heart failure, and 2.2% with acute kidney failure; 5.9% of patients needed first-time dialysis. During the first year after discharge, 0.8% of patients who had had aortic dissection were admitted to a nursing home, 7.8% started home care, and 5.9% died. Among controls, these rates were 0.2%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively. Patients who had had aortic dissection had significantly increased risk of initiating home care (hazard ratio, 7.47 [95% CI, 5.38-18.37]; <i>P</i> < .001) and of being admitted to a nursing home (hazard ratio, 4.28 [95% CI, 1.73-10.59]; <i>P</i> = .001). Initiation of home care and nursing home admission were related to advanced age, female sex, preexisting comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and conservative management of type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a small proportion of patients who survived an aortic dissection needed home care or nursing home admission after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":48680,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","volume":"51 2","pages":"e238366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing Home Admission and Home Care Initiation After Acute Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Registry-Based Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Weinkouff Pedersen, Riina Oksjoki, Jacob Eifer Møller, Anna Gundlund, Emil Fosbøl, Dorte Guldbrand Nielsen, Lars Køber, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Peter Søgaard, Niels Holmark Andersen, Kristian Kragholm\",\"doi\":\"10.14503/THIJ-23-8366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about long-term outcomes beyond survival following acute aortic dissection. The aim of this research was to evaluate rates of home care initiation and nursing home admission during the first year after discharge and to assess factors associated with these needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection type A or B between 2006 and 2015 were identified using national registries. Patients discharged alive without nursing home or home care use before aortic dissection were included, along with age-matched and sex-matched population controls without aortic dissection (at a ratio of 1:5). Cause-specific multivariable Cox regression was used to derive adjusted hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 1093 patients and 5465 control individuals with a median (IQR) age of 64 (55-71) years; 70.6% were men. During their hospital stay, 2.7% of patients were registered with a first-time diagnosis of stroke, 7.1% with heart failure, and 2.2% with acute kidney failure; 5.9% of patients needed first-time dialysis. During the first year after discharge, 0.8% of patients who had had aortic dissection were admitted to a nursing home, 7.8% started home care, and 5.9% died. Among controls, these rates were 0.2%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively. Patients who had had aortic dissection had significantly increased risk of initiating home care (hazard ratio, 7.47 [95% CI, 5.38-18.37]; <i>P</i> < .001) and of being admitted to a nursing home (hazard ratio, 4.28 [95% CI, 1.73-10.59]; <i>P</i> = .001). Initiation of home care and nursing home admission were related to advanced age, female sex, preexisting comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and conservative management of type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a small proportion of patients who survived an aortic dissection needed home care or nursing home admission after hospital discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Heart Institute Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"e238366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Heart Institute Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nursing Home Admission and Home Care Initiation After Acute Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Registry-Based Cohort Study.
Background: Little is known about long-term outcomes beyond survival following acute aortic dissection. The aim of this research was to evaluate rates of home care initiation and nursing home admission during the first year after discharge and to assess factors associated with these needs.
Methods: All patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection type A or B between 2006 and 2015 were identified using national registries. Patients discharged alive without nursing home or home care use before aortic dissection were included, along with age-matched and sex-matched population controls without aortic dissection (at a ratio of 1:5). Cause-specific multivariable Cox regression was used to derive adjusted hazard ratios.
Results: The study population comprised 1093 patients and 5465 control individuals with a median (IQR) age of 64 (55-71) years; 70.6% were men. During their hospital stay, 2.7% of patients were registered with a first-time diagnosis of stroke, 7.1% with heart failure, and 2.2% with acute kidney failure; 5.9% of patients needed first-time dialysis. During the first year after discharge, 0.8% of patients who had had aortic dissection were admitted to a nursing home, 7.8% started home care, and 5.9% died. Among controls, these rates were 0.2%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively. Patients who had had aortic dissection had significantly increased risk of initiating home care (hazard ratio, 7.47 [95% CI, 5.38-18.37]; P < .001) and of being admitted to a nursing home (hazard ratio, 4.28 [95% CI, 1.73-10.59]; P = .001). Initiation of home care and nursing home admission were related to advanced age, female sex, preexisting comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and conservative management of type A aortic dissection.
Conclusion: Only a small proportion of patients who survived an aortic dissection needed home care or nursing home admission after hospital discharge.
期刊介绍:
For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease.
The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central.
The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review:
-Clinical Investigations-
Laboratory Investigations-
Reviews-
Techniques-
Coronary Anomalies-
History of Medicine-
Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)-
Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)-
Guest Editorials-
Peabody’s Corner-
Letters to the Editor