用软机器人模拟情感接触的心理和神经效应:一项实验研究。

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS
Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1419262
Caroline Y Zheng, Ker-Jiun Wang, Maitreyee Wairagkar, Mariana von Mohr, Erik Lintunen, Aikaterini Fotopoulou
{"title":"用软机器人模拟情感接触的心理和神经效应:一项实验研究。","authors":"Caroline Y Zheng, Ker-Jiun Wang, Maitreyee Wairagkar, Mariana von Mohr, Erik Lintunen, Aikaterini Fotopoulou","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1419262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human affective touch is known to be beneficial for social-emotional interactions and has a therapeutic effect. For touch initiated by robotic entities, richer affective affordance is a critical enabler to unlock its potential in social-emotional interactions and especially in care and therapeutic applications. Simulating the attributes of particular types of human affective touch to inform robotic touch design can be a beneficial step. Inspired by the scientific finding on CT-optimal affective touch - a gentle skin stroking at velocities of 1-10 cm/s evidenced to be pleasant and calming, we developed a proof-of-concept haptic rendering system - S-CAT, using pneumatic silicone soft robotic material to simulate the attributes (velocity, temperature and applied normal force) of CT-optimal affective touch. To investigate whether the affective touch performed by the S-CAT system elicits psychological effects comparable to CT-optimal, manual affective touch, we conducted an experimental study comparing the effects of CT-optimal versus non-CT-optimal stimulation velocities in each of three types of stimulation modes (S-CAT device, skin-to-skin manual stroking, hairbrush manual stroking), and across them. Our measures included subjective ratings of touch pleasantness and intensity, neurophysiological responses (EEG), and qualitative comments. Our results showed that velocity modulated subjective and neurophysiological responses in each and across these three stimulation modes, and that CT-optimal stimulations from S-CAT system and manual method received similar ratings and verbal comments on pleasantness, suggesting that the S-CAT touch can have comparable effects to manual stroking. We discuss the design insights learned and the design space that this study opens up to support well-being and healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"11 ","pages":"1419262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating the psychological and neural effects of affective touch with soft robotics: an experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Y Zheng, Ker-Jiun Wang, Maitreyee Wairagkar, Mariana von Mohr, Erik Lintunen, Aikaterini Fotopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frobt.2024.1419262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human affective touch is known to be beneficial for social-emotional interactions and has a therapeutic effect. For touch initiated by robotic entities, richer affective affordance is a critical enabler to unlock its potential in social-emotional interactions and especially in care and therapeutic applications. Simulating the attributes of particular types of human affective touch to inform robotic touch design can be a beneficial step. Inspired by the scientific finding on CT-optimal affective touch - a gentle skin stroking at velocities of 1-10 cm/s evidenced to be pleasant and calming, we developed a proof-of-concept haptic rendering system - S-CAT, using pneumatic silicone soft robotic material to simulate the attributes (velocity, temperature and applied normal force) of CT-optimal affective touch. To investigate whether the affective touch performed by the S-CAT system elicits psychological effects comparable to CT-optimal, manual affective touch, we conducted an experimental study comparing the effects of CT-optimal versus non-CT-optimal stimulation velocities in each of three types of stimulation modes (S-CAT device, skin-to-skin manual stroking, hairbrush manual stroking), and across them. Our measures included subjective ratings of touch pleasantness and intensity, neurophysiological responses (EEG), and qualitative comments. Our results showed that velocity modulated subjective and neurophysiological responses in each and across these three stimulation modes, and that CT-optimal stimulations from S-CAT system and manual method received similar ratings and verbal comments on pleasantness, suggesting that the S-CAT touch can have comparable effects to manual stroking. We discuss the design insights learned and the design space that this study opens up to support well-being and healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Robotics and AI\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1419262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Robotics and AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1419262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1419262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,人类的情感触摸有利于社会情感互动,并具有治疗效果。对于由机器人实体启动的触摸,更丰富的情感承受能力是释放其在社会情感互动,特别是在护理和治疗应用中潜力的关键因素。模拟特定类型的人类情感触觉属性,为机器人触觉设计提供依据,是一个有益的步骤。受 CT 最佳情感触觉科学发现的启发,我们开发了一个概念验证触觉渲染系统 - S-CAT,使用气动硅胶软机器人材料来模拟 CT 最佳情感触觉的属性(速度、温度和施加的法向力)。为了研究 S-CAT 系统进行的情感触觉是否能引起与 CT 最佳手动情感触觉相当的心理效应,我们进行了一项实验研究,比较了 CT 最佳与非 CT 最佳刺激速度在三种刺激模式(S-CAT 设备、皮肤对皮肤手动抚摸、毛刷手动抚摸)中每种模式下以及在它们之间的效果。我们的测量指标包括触感舒适度和强度的主观评分、神经电生理反应(脑电图)和定性评论。我们的结果表明,速度调节了这三种刺激模式中每一种模式的主观反应和神经生理学反应,S-CAT 系统和手动方法的 CT 最佳刺激获得了相似的愉快度评分和口头评论,这表明 S-CAT 触摸可以产生与手动抚摸相似的效果。我们将讨论所学到的设计见解以及本研究为支持健康和医疗保健所开辟的设计空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulating the psychological and neural effects of affective touch with soft robotics: an experimental study.

Human affective touch is known to be beneficial for social-emotional interactions and has a therapeutic effect. For touch initiated by robotic entities, richer affective affordance is a critical enabler to unlock its potential in social-emotional interactions and especially in care and therapeutic applications. Simulating the attributes of particular types of human affective touch to inform robotic touch design can be a beneficial step. Inspired by the scientific finding on CT-optimal affective touch - a gentle skin stroking at velocities of 1-10 cm/s evidenced to be pleasant and calming, we developed a proof-of-concept haptic rendering system - S-CAT, using pneumatic silicone soft robotic material to simulate the attributes (velocity, temperature and applied normal force) of CT-optimal affective touch. To investigate whether the affective touch performed by the S-CAT system elicits psychological effects comparable to CT-optimal, manual affective touch, we conducted an experimental study comparing the effects of CT-optimal versus non-CT-optimal stimulation velocities in each of three types of stimulation modes (S-CAT device, skin-to-skin manual stroking, hairbrush manual stroking), and across them. Our measures included subjective ratings of touch pleasantness and intensity, neurophysiological responses (EEG), and qualitative comments. Our results showed that velocity modulated subjective and neurophysiological responses in each and across these three stimulation modes, and that CT-optimal stimulations from S-CAT system and manual method received similar ratings and verbal comments on pleasantness, suggesting that the S-CAT touch can have comparable effects to manual stroking. We discuss the design insights learned and the design space that this study opens up to support well-being and healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信