增加流行病学研究作为化学品风险评估关键证据的效用。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Heather R Schaefer, Melissa J Vincent, Carol J Burns, Sabine S Lange
{"title":"增加流行病学研究作为化学品风险评估关键证据的效用。","authors":"Heather R Schaefer, Melissa J Vincent, Carol J Burns, Sabine S Lange","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfae134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Society of Toxicology 2024 meeting assembled risk assessors, epidemiologists, and toxicologists to discuss the utility of integrating epidemiologic data into the derivation of reference values. Advantages of the use of epidemiologic evidence include (i) human relevance; (ii) increased likelihood that exposure levels are relevant to risk assessment; and (iii) incorporation of uncertainties attributed to co-exposures or other population-based considerations. The workshop panelists discussed the challenges of incorporating epidemiologic evidence due to uncertain exposure measurements, confounding, heterogeneity, and inherent study design limitations. Capturing uncertainty is a critical step. In summary, epidemiologic evidence can be a valuable tool for risk analysis. This workshop brief captures constructive considerations from practitioners in the field that can increase the utility of epidemiologic studies in chemical risk assessment and harmonize the approach for use in dose-response assessment that will ultimately reduce uncertainty related to chemical exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"166-170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing the utility of epidemiologic studies as key evidence in chemical risk assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Heather R Schaefer, Melissa J Vincent, Carol J Burns, Sabine S Lange\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/kfae134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Society of Toxicology 2024 meeting assembled risk assessors, epidemiologists, and toxicologists to discuss the utility of integrating epidemiologic data into the derivation of reference values. Advantages of the use of epidemiologic evidence include (i) human relevance; (ii) increased likelihood that exposure levels are relevant to risk assessment; and (iii) incorporation of uncertainties attributed to co-exposures or other population-based considerations. The workshop panelists discussed the challenges of incorporating epidemiologic evidence due to uncertain exposure measurements, confounding, heterogeneity, and inherent study design limitations. Capturing uncertainty is a critical step. In summary, epidemiologic evidence can be a valuable tool for risk analysis. This workshop brief captures constructive considerations from practitioners in the field that can increase the utility of epidemiologic studies in chemical risk assessment and harmonize the approach for use in dose-response assessment that will ultimately reduce uncertainty related to chemical exposures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"166-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775416/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae134\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毒理学学会2024年会议汇集了风险评估人员、流行病学家和毒理学家,讨论将流行病学数据整合到参考值推导中的效用。使用流行病学证据的优点包括:(i)与人有关;(ii)暴露水平与风险评估相关的可能性增加;(iii)纳入由于共同暴露或其他基于人群的考虑而产生的不确定性。研讨会小组成员讨论了由于不确定的暴露测量、混杂、异质性和固有的研究设计限制而纳入流行病学证据的挑战。捕捉不确定性是关键的一步。总之,流行病学证据可作为风险分析的宝贵工具。本讲习班简报收集了该领域从业人员的建设性意见,这些意见可以增加流行病学研究在化学品风险评估中的效用,并协调剂量-反应评估中使用的方法,从而最终减少与化学品接触有关的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing the utility of epidemiologic studies as key evidence in chemical risk assessment.

The Society of Toxicology 2024 meeting assembled risk assessors, epidemiologists, and toxicologists to discuss the utility of integrating epidemiologic data into the derivation of reference values. Advantages of the use of epidemiologic evidence include (i) human relevance; (ii) increased likelihood that exposure levels are relevant to risk assessment; and (iii) incorporation of uncertainties attributed to co-exposures or other population-based considerations. The workshop panelists discussed the challenges of incorporating epidemiologic evidence due to uncertain exposure measurements, confounding, heterogeneity, and inherent study design limitations. Capturing uncertainty is a critical step. In summary, epidemiologic evidence can be a valuable tool for risk analysis. This workshop brief captures constructive considerations from practitioners in the field that can increase the utility of epidemiologic studies in chemical risk assessment and harmonize the approach for use in dose-response assessment that will ultimately reduce uncertainty related to chemical exposures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信