Jen Ghabrial, Victoria Stinnett, Efrain Ribeiro, Melanie Klausner, Laura Morsberger, Patty Long, William Middlezong, Rena Xian, Christopher Gocke, Ming-Tseh Lin, Lisa Rooper, Ezra Baraban, Pedram Argani, Aparna Pallavajjala, Jaclyn B Murry, John M Gross, Ying S Zou
{"title":"利用光学基因组图谱和新一代测序对骨与软组织肿瘤进行综合分析的诊断和预后/治疗意义。","authors":"Jen Ghabrial, Victoria Stinnett, Efrain Ribeiro, Melanie Klausner, Laura Morsberger, Patty Long, William Middlezong, Rena Xian, Christopher Gocke, Ming-Tseh Lin, Lisa Rooper, Ezra Baraban, Pedram Argani, Aparna Pallavajjala, Jaclyn B Murry, John M Gross, Ying S Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting somatic structural variants (SVs), copy number variants (CNVs), and mutations in bone and soft tissue tumors is essential for accurately diagnosing, treating, and prognosticating outcomes. Optical genome mapping (OGM) holds promise to yield useful data on SVs and CNVs but requires fresh or snap-frozen tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of data from OGM compared to current standard-of-care cytogenetic testing. We evaluated 60 consecutive specimens from bone and soft tissue tumors using OGM and karyotyping, FISH, gene fusion assays, and deep next-generation sequencing (NGS). OGM accurately identified diagnostic SVs/CNVs previously detected by karyotyping and FISH (specificity=100%). OGM identified diagnostic and pathogenic SVs/CNVs (∼23% of cases) undetected by karyotyping (cryptic/submicroscopic). OGM allowed detection and further characterization of complex structural rearrangements including chromoanagenesis (27% of cases) and complex 3-6-way translocations (15% of cases). In addition to identifying 321 SVs and CNVs among cases with chromoanagenesis events, OGM identified approximately 9 SVs and 12 CNVs per sample. A combination of OGM and deep NGS data identified diagnostic and pathogenic SVs, CNVs, and mutations in ∼98% of cases. Our cohort contained the most extensive collection of bone and soft tissue tumors profiled by OGM. OGM had excellent concordance with standard-of-care cytogenetic testing, detecting and assigning high-resolution genome-wide genomic abnormalities with higher sensitivity than routine testing. This is the first and largest study to provide insights into the clinical utility of combined OGM and deep sequencing for the pathologic diagnosis and potential prognostication of bone and soft tissue tumors in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100684"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and Prognostic/Therapeutic Significance of Comprehensive Analysis of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Using Optical Genome Mapping and Next-generation Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Jen Ghabrial, Victoria Stinnett, Efrain Ribeiro, Melanie Klausner, Laura Morsberger, Patty Long, William Middlezong, Rena Xian, Christopher Gocke, Ming-Tseh Lin, Lisa Rooper, Ezra Baraban, Pedram Argani, Aparna Pallavajjala, Jaclyn B Murry, John M Gross, Ying S Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Detecting somatic structural variants (SVs), copy number variants (CNVs), and mutations in bone and soft tissue tumors is essential for accurately diagnosing, treating, and prognosticating outcomes. Optical genome mapping (OGM) holds promise to yield useful data on SVs and CNVs but requires fresh or snap-frozen tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of data from OGM compared to current standard-of-care cytogenetic testing. We evaluated 60 consecutive specimens from bone and soft tissue tumors using OGM and karyotyping, FISH, gene fusion assays, and deep next-generation sequencing (NGS). OGM accurately identified diagnostic SVs/CNVs previously detected by karyotyping and FISH (specificity=100%). OGM identified diagnostic and pathogenic SVs/CNVs (∼23% of cases) undetected by karyotyping (cryptic/submicroscopic). OGM allowed detection and further characterization of complex structural rearrangements including chromoanagenesis (27% of cases) and complex 3-6-way translocations (15% of cases). In addition to identifying 321 SVs and CNVs among cases with chromoanagenesis events, OGM identified approximately 9 SVs and 12 CNVs per sample. A combination of OGM and deep NGS data identified diagnostic and pathogenic SVs, CNVs, and mutations in ∼98% of cases. Our cohort contained the most extensive collection of bone and soft tissue tumors profiled by OGM. OGM had excellent concordance with standard-of-care cytogenetic testing, detecting and assigning high-resolution genome-wide genomic abnormalities with higher sensitivity than routine testing. This is the first and largest study to provide insights into the clinical utility of combined OGM and deep sequencing for the pathologic diagnosis and potential prognostication of bone and soft tissue tumors in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100684\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic and Prognostic/Therapeutic Significance of Comprehensive Analysis of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Using Optical Genome Mapping and Next-generation Sequencing.
Detecting somatic structural variants (SVs), copy number variants (CNVs), and mutations in bone and soft tissue tumors is essential for accurately diagnosing, treating, and prognosticating outcomes. Optical genome mapping (OGM) holds promise to yield useful data on SVs and CNVs but requires fresh or snap-frozen tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of data from OGM compared to current standard-of-care cytogenetic testing. We evaluated 60 consecutive specimens from bone and soft tissue tumors using OGM and karyotyping, FISH, gene fusion assays, and deep next-generation sequencing (NGS). OGM accurately identified diagnostic SVs/CNVs previously detected by karyotyping and FISH (specificity=100%). OGM identified diagnostic and pathogenic SVs/CNVs (∼23% of cases) undetected by karyotyping (cryptic/submicroscopic). OGM allowed detection and further characterization of complex structural rearrangements including chromoanagenesis (27% of cases) and complex 3-6-way translocations (15% of cases). In addition to identifying 321 SVs and CNVs among cases with chromoanagenesis events, OGM identified approximately 9 SVs and 12 CNVs per sample. A combination of OGM and deep NGS data identified diagnostic and pathogenic SVs, CNVs, and mutations in ∼98% of cases. Our cohort contained the most extensive collection of bone and soft tissue tumors profiled by OGM. OGM had excellent concordance with standard-of-care cytogenetic testing, detecting and assigning high-resolution genome-wide genomic abnormalities with higher sensitivity than routine testing. This is the first and largest study to provide insights into the clinical utility of combined OGM and deep sequencing for the pathologic diagnosis and potential prognostication of bone and soft tissue tumors in routine clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology.
Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.