胸大肌皮瓣移位术治疗胸骨深部伤口感染:疗效和安全性的系统因素分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1490
Qiuming Hu, Kaisheng Wu, Zhang Chen, Adnan Abibe Goia, Connor J Maloney, James D Maloney, Haibo Zhang
{"title":"胸大肌皮瓣移位术治疗胸骨深部伤口感染:疗效和安全性的系统因素分析。","authors":"Qiuming Hu, Kaisheng Wu, Zhang Chen, Adnan Abibe Goia, Connor J Maloney, James D Maloney, Haibo Zhang","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a life-threatening postoperative complication of cardiac surgery. Currently, there are many therapies used to treat patients with DSWI. However, none of these therapies have been shown to be the optimal choice for patients with DSWI. Additionally, these methods may require additional facilities which limit their widespread use. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and risk factors related to the prognosis of DSWI patients treated with pectoralis major flap transposition (PMFT), a more concise method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, systemic analysis was conducted of DSWI patients at the Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2010 until December 2020. All the patients were diagnosed with DSWI according to the relevant guidelines, and treated with PMFT. The patients were divided into the following two groups based on their prognosis after treatment with PMFT: (I) the wound healing (WH) group; and (II) the delayed wound healing or death (DWHD) group. All the participants were followed up for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9.7% (76/785) of the DSWI patients experienced DWHD in the present study. The all-cause mortality rate was 3.7% (29/785). While 90.3% (709/785) of the patients achieved WH after undergoing PMFT. The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that patients with diabetes mellitus, obesity, a history of smoking, abnormal liver function, anemia, chronic infection, immune disease, hypothermia, a longer gap time, and patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assistance, salvage surgery, and secondary cardiac surgery were more likely to experience DWDH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed PMFT was a safe and effective method for treating DSWI after cardiac surgery. Patients with risk factors, such as those mentioned above, require more attention. Prospective studies should be conducted to explore the relationships among the novel risk factors and DSWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 11","pages":"7807-7818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treating deep sternal wound infection with pectoralis major flap transposition: a systemic factor analysis of efficacy and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Qiuming Hu, Kaisheng Wu, Zhang Chen, Adnan Abibe Goia, Connor J Maloney, James D Maloney, Haibo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-1490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a life-threatening postoperative complication of cardiac surgery. Currently, there are many therapies used to treat patients with DSWI. However, none of these therapies have been shown to be the optimal choice for patients with DSWI. Additionally, these methods may require additional facilities which limit their widespread use. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and risk factors related to the prognosis of DSWI patients treated with pectoralis major flap transposition (PMFT), a more concise method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, systemic analysis was conducted of DSWI patients at the Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2010 until December 2020. All the patients were diagnosed with DSWI according to the relevant guidelines, and treated with PMFT. The patients were divided into the following two groups based on their prognosis after treatment with PMFT: (I) the wound healing (WH) group; and (II) the delayed wound healing or death (DWHD) group. All the participants were followed up for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9.7% (76/785) of the DSWI patients experienced DWHD in the present study. The all-cause mortality rate was 3.7% (29/785). While 90.3% (709/785) of the patients achieved WH after undergoing PMFT. The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that patients with diabetes mellitus, obesity, a history of smoking, abnormal liver function, anemia, chronic infection, immune disease, hypothermia, a longer gap time, and patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assistance, salvage surgery, and secondary cardiac surgery were more likely to experience DWDH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed PMFT was a safe and effective method for treating DSWI after cardiac surgery. Patients with risk factors, such as those mentioned above, require more attention. Prospective studies should be conducted to explore the relationships among the novel risk factors and DSWI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"16 11\",\"pages\":\"7807-7818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1490\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸骨深部伤口感染(DSWI)是心脏手术的一种危及生命的术后并发症。目前,有许多疗法可用于治疗 DSWI 患者。然而,这些疗法均未证明是 DSWI 患者的最佳选择。此外,这些方法可能需要额外的设施,这限制了它们的广泛应用。因此,我们旨在研究胸大肌皮瓣转位术(PMFT)这一更简便的方法治疗 DSWI 患者的有效性、安全性以及与预后相关的风险因素:方法:对北京安贞医院 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间的 DSWI 患者进行回顾性系统分析。所有患者均根据相关指南确诊为 DSWI,并接受了 PMFT 治疗。根据患者接受 PMFT 治疗后的预后情况,将其分为以下两组:(I) 伤口愈合(WH)组;(II) 伤口延迟愈合或死亡(DWHD)组。所有参与者均接受了为期一年的随访:结果:在本研究中,共有 9.7%(76/785)的 DSWI 患者经历了 DWHD。全因死亡率为 3.7%(29/785)。90.3%(709/785)的患者在接受 PMFT 后达到了 WH。多变量逻辑回归模型显示,糖尿病、肥胖、吸烟史、肝功能异常、贫血、慢性感染、免疫性疾病、低体温、间隙时间较长的患者,以及需要体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)辅助、抢救手术和二次心脏手术的患者更有可能出现DWDH:本研究表明,PMFT 是治疗心脏手术后 DSWI 的一种安全有效的方法。有上述危险因素的患者需要更多关注。应开展前瞻性研究,探讨新的危险因素与DSWI之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treating deep sternal wound infection with pectoralis major flap transposition: a systemic factor analysis of efficacy and safety.

Background: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a life-threatening postoperative complication of cardiac surgery. Currently, there are many therapies used to treat patients with DSWI. However, none of these therapies have been shown to be the optimal choice for patients with DSWI. Additionally, these methods may require additional facilities which limit their widespread use. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and risk factors related to the prognosis of DSWI patients treated with pectoralis major flap transposition (PMFT), a more concise method.

Methods: A retrospective, systemic analysis was conducted of DSWI patients at the Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2010 until December 2020. All the patients were diagnosed with DSWI according to the relevant guidelines, and treated with PMFT. The patients were divided into the following two groups based on their prognosis after treatment with PMFT: (I) the wound healing (WH) group; and (II) the delayed wound healing or death (DWHD) group. All the participants were followed up for 1 year.

Results: In total, 9.7% (76/785) of the DSWI patients experienced DWHD in the present study. The all-cause mortality rate was 3.7% (29/785). While 90.3% (709/785) of the patients achieved WH after undergoing PMFT. The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that patients with diabetes mellitus, obesity, a history of smoking, abnormal liver function, anemia, chronic infection, immune disease, hypothermia, a longer gap time, and patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assistance, salvage surgery, and secondary cardiac surgery were more likely to experience DWDH.

Conclusions: This study showed PMFT was a safe and effective method for treating DSWI after cardiac surgery. Patients with risk factors, such as those mentioned above, require more attention. Prospective studies should be conducted to explore the relationships among the novel risk factors and DSWI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信