以家庭为中心的护理:应对新型冠状病毒肺炎防控挑战并实施对策--综述。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-960
Yawen Dai, Hui Jiang
{"title":"以家庭为中心的护理:应对新型冠状病毒肺炎防控挑战并实施对策--综述。","authors":"Yawen Dai, Hui Jiang","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Family-centered care (FCC) is a mutually beneficial healthcare approach focusing on collaborative planning, delivery, and evaluation involving healthcare providers, patients, and families. The FCC approach, despite its widespread application in diverse medical contexts, encounters significant barriers in its integration into clinical practice, particularly in the management of novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). This review aims to explore the current state of research on and factors influencing the family-centered clinical model of care, and to reveal the challenges and coping strategies encountered by this model in NCP-like health crises. This review also aims to provide recommendations on how to transform the family-centered clinical care model to effectively respond to declared health emergencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six databases for relevant published literature up to August 30, 2024. In addition, reference lists of all selected publications were used to identify additional eligible studies. One researcher independently selected the literature and the results were checked by a senior researcher; these results were presented and discussed among the researchers to resolve differences and reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Seventy-three articles published from January 01, 1900 to August 30, 2024 met the inclusion criteria. The literature included the conceptual and historical development of FCC in care, areas of application of FCC, assessment and measurement tools for FCC, economic benefits of FCC, gaps in clinical implementation, impact of NCP on FCC, and coping strategies to promote FCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evolution of the FCC marks a transition from the authoritarian approach of traditional healthcare to a more humane, collaborative model. The emergence of the NCP model for prevention and control during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic posed a significant challenge to the implementation and development of the FCC. The integration of telehealth models with FCC is seen as the future of FCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 11","pages":"8014-8025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family-centered care: addressing challenges and implementing countermeasures in response to novel coronavirus pneumonia prevention and control-a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Yawen Dai, Hui Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Family-centered care (FCC) is a mutually beneficial healthcare approach focusing on collaborative planning, delivery, and evaluation involving healthcare providers, patients, and families. The FCC approach, despite its widespread application in diverse medical contexts, encounters significant barriers in its integration into clinical practice, particularly in the management of novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). This review aims to explore the current state of research on and factors influencing the family-centered clinical model of care, and to reveal the challenges and coping strategies encountered by this model in NCP-like health crises. This review also aims to provide recommendations on how to transform the family-centered clinical care model to effectively respond to declared health emergencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six databases for relevant published literature up to August 30, 2024. In addition, reference lists of all selected publications were used to identify additional eligible studies. One researcher independently selected the literature and the results were checked by a senior researcher; these results were presented and discussed among the researchers to resolve differences and reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Seventy-three articles published from January 01, 1900 to August 30, 2024 met the inclusion criteria. The literature included the conceptual and historical development of FCC in care, areas of application of FCC, assessment and measurement tools for FCC, economic benefits of FCC, gaps in clinical implementation, impact of NCP on FCC, and coping strategies to promote FCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evolution of the FCC marks a transition from the authoritarian approach of traditional healthcare to a more humane, collaborative model. The emergence of the NCP model for prevention and control during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic posed a significant challenge to the implementation and development of the FCC. The integration of telehealth models with FCC is seen as the future of FCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"16 11\",\"pages\":\"8014-8025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635241/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-960\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)是一种互惠互利的医疗保健方法,其重点在于医疗服务提供者、患者和家属之间的合作规划、实施和评估。尽管以家庭为中心的护理方法在不同的医疗环境中得到了广泛应用,但在融入临床实践的过程中,尤其是在新型冠状病毒肺炎(NCP)的管理中,却遇到了巨大的障碍。本综述旨在探讨以家庭为中心的临床护理模式的研究现状和影响因素,并揭示该模式在类似 NCP 的健康危机中遇到的挑战和应对策略。本综述还旨在就如何转变以家庭为中心的临床护理模式以有效应对已宣布的健康突发事件提出建议:我们在六个数据库中检索了截至 2024 年 8 月 30 日已发表的相关文献。此外,我们还使用了所有选定出版物的参考文献目录,以确定更多符合条件的研究。一名研究人员独立筛选文献,并由一名资深研究人员对结果进行检查;这些结果在研究人员之间进行展示和讨论,以解决分歧并达成共识:从 1900 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 8 月 30 日发表的 73 篇文章符合纳入标准。文献内容包括护理中的FCC的概念和历史发展、FCC的应用领域、FCC的评估和测量工具、FCC的经济效益、临床实施中的差距、NCP对FCC的影响以及促进FCC的应对策略:FCC 的演变标志着从传统医疗保健的专制方法向更人性化的合作模式过渡。在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情期间,NCP 防控模式的出现对 FCC 的实施和发展提出了重大挑战。远程医疗模式与 FCC 的整合被视为 FCC 的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family-centered care: addressing challenges and implementing countermeasures in response to novel coronavirus pneumonia prevention and control-a narrative review.

Background and objective: Family-centered care (FCC) is a mutually beneficial healthcare approach focusing on collaborative planning, delivery, and evaluation involving healthcare providers, patients, and families. The FCC approach, despite its widespread application in diverse medical contexts, encounters significant barriers in its integration into clinical practice, particularly in the management of novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). This review aims to explore the current state of research on and factors influencing the family-centered clinical model of care, and to reveal the challenges and coping strategies encountered by this model in NCP-like health crises. This review also aims to provide recommendations on how to transform the family-centered clinical care model to effectively respond to declared health emergencies.

Methods: We searched six databases for relevant published literature up to August 30, 2024. In addition, reference lists of all selected publications were used to identify additional eligible studies. One researcher independently selected the literature and the results were checked by a senior researcher; these results were presented and discussed among the researchers to resolve differences and reach consensus.

Key content and findings: Seventy-three articles published from January 01, 1900 to August 30, 2024 met the inclusion criteria. The literature included the conceptual and historical development of FCC in care, areas of application of FCC, assessment and measurement tools for FCC, economic benefits of FCC, gaps in clinical implementation, impact of NCP on FCC, and coping strategies to promote FCC.

Conclusions: The evolution of the FCC marks a transition from the authoritarian approach of traditional healthcare to a more humane, collaborative model. The emergence of the NCP model for prevention and control during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic posed a significant challenge to the implementation and development of the FCC. The integration of telehealth models with FCC is seen as the future of FCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信