女性与血友病的历史:对不断演变的观念和检测方法的叙述性回顾。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Megan Chaigneau, Mackenzie Bowman, Pamela Wilton, Robert Card, Man-Chiu Poon, David Lillicrap, Michelle Sholzberg, Paula James
{"title":"女性与血友病的历史:对不断演变的观念和检测方法的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Megan Chaigneau, Mackenzie Bowman, Pamela Wilton, Robert Card, Man-Chiu Poon, David Lillicrap, Michelle Sholzberg, Paula James","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The history of hemophilia is well-documented, yet reports focus heavily on the male-perspective and severe forms of the disease. Although hemophilia was initially believed to only affect men with women seen as silent carriers, it is now universally acknowledged that women and girls can also be affected. In this narrative review, we track the progression of beliefs about women and hemophilia as documented in the literature from pre-1800's to the present time. We present a timeline of evolving beliefs and testing practices and identify nine distinct time periods when key shifts occurred related to various scientific discoveries. Our review highlights how women affected by hemophilia experienced complete dismissal of their health issues despite evidence of bleeding symptoms as early as the 1900's. We identify 1990 as a major timepoint for shifting beliefs when large scale acknowledgement that hemophilia also affects women is documented and systematic testing for bleeding risk is first suggested. Women evolve from being seen as unaffected genetic transmitters only to being recognized as a population affected by hemophilia in unique ways requiring timely testing and effective treatment. Yet despite documented progress, recent publications document many persistent issues such as delayed diagnosis, untreated symptoms, and barriers to care. Ongoing research and advocacy efforts are required to improve knowledge translation until real-world outcomes are seen in screening, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The history of women and hemophilia: a narrative review of evolving beliefs and testing practices.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Chaigneau, Mackenzie Bowman, Pamela Wilton, Robert Card, Man-Chiu Poon, David Lillicrap, Michelle Sholzberg, Paula James\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2024.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The history of hemophilia is well-documented, yet reports focus heavily on the male-perspective and severe forms of the disease. Although hemophilia was initially believed to only affect men with women seen as silent carriers, it is now universally acknowledged that women and girls can also be affected. In this narrative review, we track the progression of beliefs about women and hemophilia as documented in the literature from pre-1800's to the present time. We present a timeline of evolving beliefs and testing practices and identify nine distinct time periods when key shifts occurred related to various scientific discoveries. Our review highlights how women affected by hemophilia experienced complete dismissal of their health issues despite evidence of bleeding symptoms as early as the 1900's. We identify 1990 as a major timepoint for shifting beliefs when large scale acknowledgement that hemophilia also affects women is documented and systematic testing for bleeding risk is first suggested. Women evolve from being seen as unaffected genetic transmitters only to being recognized as a population affected by hemophilia in unique ways requiring timely testing and effective treatment. Yet despite documented progress, recent publications document many persistent issues such as delayed diagnosis, untreated symptoms, and barriers to care. Ongoing research and advocacy efforts are required to improve knowledge translation until real-world outcomes are seen in screening, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2024.12.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2024.12.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血友病的历史有据可查,但相关报道主要集中在男性视角和严重形式的血友病上。虽然人们最初认为血友病只影响男性,女性被视为沉默的携带者,但现在人们普遍承认女性和女孩也会受到影响。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们追踪了从 1800 年前到现在的文献中记载的有关女性和血友病的观念的演变过程。我们列出了信念和检测方法演变的时间轴,并确定了与各种科学发现相关的发生关键转变的九个不同时期。我们的综述强调了早在 1900 年代,尽管有出血症状的证据,但血友病女性患者的健康问题如何被完全忽视。我们认为 1990 年是观念转变的一个重要时间节点,因为在这一年,人们大规模承认血友病也会影响女性,并首次建议对出血风险进行系统检测。女性从仅被视为未受影响的基因传递者,发展到被认为是受血友病影响的人群,需要及时检测和有效治疗。然而,尽管取得了有目共睹的进展,但最近的出版物仍记录了许多长期存在的问题,如诊断延迟、症状未得到治疗以及治疗障碍等。在筛查、诊断、治疗和预防出血方面取得实际成果之前,需要持续开展研究和宣传工作,以改善知识转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The history of women and hemophilia: a narrative review of evolving beliefs and testing practices.

The history of hemophilia is well-documented, yet reports focus heavily on the male-perspective and severe forms of the disease. Although hemophilia was initially believed to only affect men with women seen as silent carriers, it is now universally acknowledged that women and girls can also be affected. In this narrative review, we track the progression of beliefs about women and hemophilia as documented in the literature from pre-1800's to the present time. We present a timeline of evolving beliefs and testing practices and identify nine distinct time periods when key shifts occurred related to various scientific discoveries. Our review highlights how women affected by hemophilia experienced complete dismissal of their health issues despite evidence of bleeding symptoms as early as the 1900's. We identify 1990 as a major timepoint for shifting beliefs when large scale acknowledgement that hemophilia also affects women is documented and systematic testing for bleeding risk is first suggested. Women evolve from being seen as unaffected genetic transmitters only to being recognized as a population affected by hemophilia in unique ways requiring timely testing and effective treatment. Yet despite documented progress, recent publications document many persistent issues such as delayed diagnosis, untreated symptoms, and barriers to care. Ongoing research and advocacy efforts are required to improve knowledge translation until real-world outcomes are seen in screening, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信