{"title":"When Health Care Needs a Centre, When It Doesn't, and Why It Matters","authors":"Stephen Buetow","doi":"10.1111/jep.14271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper examines the concept of centredness in health care, with a particular focus on person-centred care. While the principle of centring care is widely accepted, the concept of a ‘centre’ remains ambiguous, complicating its implementation. The paper defines centredness, questions the necessity of a central focus and explores alternative models. It suggests that while centredness has helped to address historical imbalances, it risks oversimplification, reducing care to a binary structure of centre and periphery. It also excludes non-persons and lacks cultural sensitivity. Alternative frameworks, such as distributed care, shift away from a singular focus toward a more dynamic, networked approach. Distributed care offers flexibility and inclusivity, but it raises challenges about coordination and the potential emergence of a new implicit centre: distribution itself. Hybrid models combining elements of centred and distributed care offer a path forward. Empirical research is needed to compare these approaches, with the aim of developing more responsive and adaptable systems to address diverse and complex needs for health care.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Health Care Needs a Centre, When It Doesn't, and Why It Matters
This paper examines the concept of centredness in health care, with a particular focus on person-centred care. While the principle of centring care is widely accepted, the concept of a ‘centre’ remains ambiguous, complicating its implementation. The paper defines centredness, questions the necessity of a central focus and explores alternative models. It suggests that while centredness has helped to address historical imbalances, it risks oversimplification, reducing care to a binary structure of centre and periphery. It also excludes non-persons and lacks cultural sensitivity. Alternative frameworks, such as distributed care, shift away from a singular focus toward a more dynamic, networked approach. Distributed care offers flexibility and inclusivity, but it raises challenges about coordination and the potential emergence of a new implicit centre: distribution itself. Hybrid models combining elements of centred and distributed care offer a path forward. Empirical research is needed to compare these approaches, with the aim of developing more responsive and adaptable systems to address diverse and complex needs for health care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.