{"title":"决定多发性骨髓瘤治疗结果的医疗保健系统:拉丁美洲 MYLACRE 研究的最终结果。","authors":"Vania Hungria, Rafael Gaiolla, Kenny Galvez, Guillermina Remaggi, Natalia Schutz, Rosane Bittencourt, Angelo Maiolino, Guillermo Quintero-Vega, Maria Silvana Cugliari, Walter Moises Tobias Braga, Carolina Colaco Villarim, Edvan Crusoe, Alicia Ines Enrico, Gaston Caiero, Jandey Bigonha, Fernanda Lemos Moura, Jair Figueroa, Claudia Lucia Sossa Melo, Milton Lombana, Huiling Pei, Mariana Fernandez, Jaqueline Saes, Damila Cristina Trufelli","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Although systemic therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, state-of-the-art treatment is not uniformly available in Latin America. In some countries, disparities between the public and private sectors in clinical presentation, access to novel agents, and transplantation are striking, with the public sector lagging. We conducted a multicenter, observational study of patients with MM in 5 Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Panama). We enrolled patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with MM between January 2016 and June 2021, using data collected between May 2019 and June 2022. We categorized institutions as \"public\" when primarily funded by federal or local government, and \"private\" when financed mostly or completely by other sources. We analyzed 1029 patients, 1021 of whom could be classified into public (n = 339) and private (n = 682) institutions. These 2 groups differed in many respects, with patients from the latter having better baseline prognostic features (including eligibility to transplantation) and receiving combinations of immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, as well as anti-CD38 antibodies, more frequently than patients from public institutions. Among 960 patients with complete data for this analysis, the median overall survival was 44.6 months in public institutions and 53.3 months in private institutions (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.04; P = .109). Our results indicate diagnostic and therapeutic shortcomings in the management of MM in Latin America, with important gaps in patient profile, treatment patterns and long-term outcomes between public and private institutions. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03955900.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"1293-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health care systems as determinants of outcomes in multiple myeloma: final results from the Latin American MYLACRE study.\",\"authors\":\"Vania Hungria, Rafael Gaiolla, Kenny Galvez, Guillermina Remaggi, Natalia Schutz, Rosane Bittencourt, Angelo Maiolino, Guillermo Quintero-Vega, Maria Silvana Cugliari, Walter Moises Tobias Braga, Carolina Colaco Villarim, Edvan Crusoe, Alicia Ines Enrico, Gaston Caiero, Jandey Bigonha, Fernanda Lemos Moura, Jair Figueroa, Claudia Lucia Sossa Melo, Milton Lombana, Huiling Pei, Mariana Fernandez, Jaqueline Saes, Damila Cristina Trufelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Although systemic therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, state-of-the-art treatment is not uniformly available in Latin America. In some countries, disparities between the public and private sectors in clinical presentation, access to novel agents, and transplantation are striking, with the public sector lagging. We conducted a multicenter, observational study of patients with MM in 5 Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Panama). We enrolled patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with MM between January 2016 and June 2021, using data collected between May 2019 and June 2022. We categorized institutions as \\\"public\\\" when primarily funded by federal or local government, and \\\"private\\\" when financed mostly or completely by other sources. We analyzed 1029 patients, 1021 of whom could be classified into public (n = 339) and private (n = 682) institutions. These 2 groups differed in many respects, with patients from the latter having better baseline prognostic features (including eligibility to transplantation) and receiving combinations of immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, as well as anti-CD38 antibodies, more frequently than patients from public institutions. Among 960 patients with complete data for this analysis, the median overall survival was 44.6 months in public institutions and 53.3 months in private institutions (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.04; P = .109). Our results indicate diagnostic and therapeutic shortcomings in the management of MM in Latin America, with important gaps in patient profile, treatment patterns and long-term outcomes between public and private institutions. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03955900.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1293-1302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013838\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013838","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health care systems as determinants of outcomes in multiple myeloma: final results from the Latin American MYLACRE study.
Abstract: Although systemic therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, state-of-the-art treatment is not uniformly available in Latin America. In some countries, disparities between the public and private sectors in clinical presentation, access to novel agents, and transplantation are striking, with the public sector lagging. We conducted a multicenter, observational study of patients with MM in 5 Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Panama). We enrolled patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with MM between January 2016 and June 2021, using data collected between May 2019 and June 2022. We categorized institutions as "public" when primarily funded by federal or local government, and "private" when financed mostly or completely by other sources. We analyzed 1029 patients, 1021 of whom could be classified into public (n = 339) and private (n = 682) institutions. These 2 groups differed in many respects, with patients from the latter having better baseline prognostic features (including eligibility to transplantation) and receiving combinations of immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, as well as anti-CD38 antibodies, more frequently than patients from public institutions. Among 960 patients with complete data for this analysis, the median overall survival was 44.6 months in public institutions and 53.3 months in private institutions (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.04; P = .109). Our results indicate diagnostic and therapeutic shortcomings in the management of MM in Latin America, with important gaps in patient profile, treatment patterns and long-term outcomes between public and private institutions. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03955900.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.