Rochelle Wong, Paris Charilaou, Amy Hemperly, Lihui Qin, Yushan Pan, Prerna Mathani, Randy Longman, Brigid S Boland, Parambir S Dulai, Ariela K Holmer, Dana Lukin, Siddharth Singh, Mark A Valasek, William J Sandborn, Ellen Scherl, Niels Vande Casteele, Robert Battat
{"title":"接受英夫利西单抗维持治疗的炎性肠病患者疗效预测模型","authors":"Rochelle Wong, Paris Charilaou, Amy Hemperly, Lihui Qin, Yushan Pan, Prerna Mathani, Randy Longman, Brigid S Boland, Parambir S Dulai, Ariela K Holmer, Dana Lukin, Siddharth Singh, Mark A Valasek, William J Sandborn, Ellen Scherl, Niels Vande Casteele, Robert Battat","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otae052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No models predict future outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients receiving maintenance infliximab therapy. We created a predictive model for unfavorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with IBD receiving maintenance infliximab therapy at 2 centers with matched serum infliximab concentrations and blinded histologic scores (Robarts Histopathologic Index [RHI]) were included. The primary endpoint was an unfavorable outcome of active objective inflammation or need for IBD-related surgery or hospitalization at 6-18 months follow-up. Internal variables were identified using univariable analyses, modeling used multivariable analysis, and performance was assessed (area under receiver-operating curve [AUC]) and externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 81 patients, 40.7% developed unfavorable outcomes at follow-up. Infliximab concentration <9.3 µg/mL (odds ratio [OR] 5.3, <i>P</i> = .001) and RHI > 12 (OR 3.4, <i>P</i> = .03) were the only factors associated with developing the primary unfavorable outcome. A prediction score assigning 1 point to each variable had good discrimination and performed similarly on internal (AUC 0.71) and external (AUC 0.73) cohorts. The risk of primary unfavorable outcomes in internal and external cohorts, respectively, was 23% and 15% for a score of 0, 46% and 50% for a score of 1, and 100% and 75% for a score of 2. Infliximab concentration alone performed similar to the 2-predictor model in internal (AUC 0.65, <i>P</i> = .5 vs. 2-predictor model) and external (AUC 0.70, <i>P</i> = .9, vs. 2-predictor model) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using unbiased variable selection, a 2-predictor model using infliximab concentrations and histology identified IBD patients on maintenance infliximab therapy at high risk of future unfavorable outcomes. For practical applicability, infliximab concentrations alone performed similarly well.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"6 4","pages":"otae052"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Model for Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Receiving Maintenance Infliximab Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Rochelle Wong, Paris Charilaou, Amy Hemperly, Lihui Qin, Yushan Pan, Prerna Mathani, Randy Longman, Brigid S Boland, Parambir S Dulai, Ariela K Holmer, Dana Lukin, Siddharth Singh, Mark A Valasek, William J Sandborn, Ellen Scherl, Niels Vande Casteele, Robert Battat\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otae052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No models predict future outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients receiving maintenance infliximab therapy. We created a predictive model for unfavorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with IBD receiving maintenance infliximab therapy at 2 centers with matched serum infliximab concentrations and blinded histologic scores (Robarts Histopathologic Index [RHI]) were included. The primary endpoint was an unfavorable outcome of active objective inflammation or need for IBD-related surgery or hospitalization at 6-18 months follow-up. Internal variables were identified using univariable analyses, modeling used multivariable analysis, and performance was assessed (area under receiver-operating curve [AUC]) and externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 81 patients, 40.7% developed unfavorable outcomes at follow-up. Infliximab concentration <9.3 µg/mL (odds ratio [OR] 5.3, <i>P</i> = .001) and RHI > 12 (OR 3.4, <i>P</i> = .03) were the only factors associated with developing the primary unfavorable outcome. A prediction score assigning 1 point to each variable had good discrimination and performed similarly on internal (AUC 0.71) and external (AUC 0.73) cohorts. The risk of primary unfavorable outcomes in internal and external cohorts, respectively, was 23% and 15% for a score of 0, 46% and 50% for a score of 1, and 100% and 75% for a score of 2. Infliximab concentration alone performed similar to the 2-predictor model in internal (AUC 0.65, <i>P</i> = .5 vs. 2-predictor model) and external (AUC 0.70, <i>P</i> = .9, vs. 2-predictor model) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using unbiased variable selection, a 2-predictor model using infliximab concentrations and histology identified IBD patients on maintenance infliximab therapy at high risk of future unfavorable outcomes. For practical applicability, infliximab concentrations alone performed similarly well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"otae052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:没有模型预测炎症性肠病(IBD)患者接受维持性英夫利昔单抗治疗的未来结局。我们创建了一个不利结果的预测模型。方法:纳入在2个中心接受英夫利昔单抗维持治疗的IBD成年患者,他们的血清英夫利昔单抗浓度和盲法组织学评分(Robarts组织病理学指数[RHI])相匹配。在6-18个月的随访中,主要终点是活跃的客观炎症或需要ibd相关手术或住院治疗的不利结果。使用单变量分析确定内部变量,使用多变量分析建模,评估绩效(接受者工作曲线下面积[AUC])并进行外部验证。结果:81例患者中,40.7%的患者在随访中出现不良结局。英夫利昔单抗浓度(P = .001)和RHI bbb12 (OR 3.4, P = .03)是导致主要不良结局的唯一相关因素。给每个变量赋1分的预测分数具有良好的辨别能力,并且在内部(AUC 0.71)和外部(AUC 0.73)队列中表现相似。在内部和外部队列中,得分为0分的主要不良结局风险分别为23%和15%,得分为1分的为46%和50%,得分为2分的为100%和75%。单独英夫利昔单抗在内部的表现与2-预测因子模型相似(AUC 0.65, P =。5 vs. 2预测器模型)和外部(AUC 0.70, P =。9, vs. 2预测模型)队列。结论:使用无偏变量选择,使用英夫利昔单抗浓度和组织学的2-预测模型确定了IBD患者在维持英夫利昔单抗治疗中未来不良结局的高风险。就实际适用性而言,单独使用英夫利昔单抗的效果同样良好。
Predictive Model for Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Receiving Maintenance Infliximab Therapy.
Background: No models predict future outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients receiving maintenance infliximab therapy. We created a predictive model for unfavorable outcomes.
Methods: Adult patients with IBD receiving maintenance infliximab therapy at 2 centers with matched serum infliximab concentrations and blinded histologic scores (Robarts Histopathologic Index [RHI]) were included. The primary endpoint was an unfavorable outcome of active objective inflammation or need for IBD-related surgery or hospitalization at 6-18 months follow-up. Internal variables were identified using univariable analyses, modeling used multivariable analysis, and performance was assessed (area under receiver-operating curve [AUC]) and externally validated.
Results: In 81 patients, 40.7% developed unfavorable outcomes at follow-up. Infliximab concentration <9.3 µg/mL (odds ratio [OR] 5.3, P = .001) and RHI > 12 (OR 3.4, P = .03) were the only factors associated with developing the primary unfavorable outcome. A prediction score assigning 1 point to each variable had good discrimination and performed similarly on internal (AUC 0.71) and external (AUC 0.73) cohorts. The risk of primary unfavorable outcomes in internal and external cohorts, respectively, was 23% and 15% for a score of 0, 46% and 50% for a score of 1, and 100% and 75% for a score of 2. Infliximab concentration alone performed similar to the 2-predictor model in internal (AUC 0.65, P = .5 vs. 2-predictor model) and external (AUC 0.70, P = .9, vs. 2-predictor model) cohorts.
Conclusions: Using unbiased variable selection, a 2-predictor model using infliximab concentrations and histology identified IBD patients on maintenance infliximab therapy at high risk of future unfavorable outcomes. For practical applicability, infliximab concentrations alone performed similarly well.