建立一个模型,用于预测接受治疗性低温的缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的脑电图癫痫发作。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/epi.18196
Shavonne L Massey, Amanda G Sandoval Karamian, Mark P Fitzgerald, France W Fung, Abigail Abramson, Mandy K Salmon, Darshana Parikh, Nicholas S Abend
{"title":"建立一个模型,用于预测接受治疗性低温的缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的脑电图癫痫发作。","authors":"Shavonne L Massey, Amanda G Sandoval Karamian, Mark P Fitzgerald, France W Fung, Abigail Abramson, Mandy K Salmon, Darshana Parikh, Nicholas S Abend","doi":"10.1111/epi.18196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electroencephalographic seizures (ES) are common in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), but identification with continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring (CEEG) is resource-intensive. We aimed to develop an ES prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospective observational study of 260 neonates with HIE undergoing CEEG, we identified clinical and EEG risk factors for ES, evaluated model performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and calculated test characteristics emphasizing high sensitivity. We assessed ES incidence and timing in neonates subdivided by ES risk group (low, moderate, high) as determined by EEG risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ES occurred in 32% (83/260) of neonates. Performing CEEG for only 24 h would fail to identify the 7% (17/260) of neonates with later onset ES (20% of all neonates experiencing ES). Identifying 90% or 95% of neonates with ES would require CEEG for 63 or 74 h, respectively. The optimal model included continuity and epileptiform discharges, both assessed in the initial 1 h of CEEG. It yielded an AUROC of .80, and at a cutoff that emphasized sensitivity, had sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 45%, positive predictive value of 44%, and negative predictive value of 95%. The model would avoid CEEG beyond 1 h in 32% (84/260) of neonates, but 6% (5/83) of neonates with ES would not have ES identified. ES incidence was significantly different (p < .01) across ES risk groups (6% low, 40% moderate, and 83% high). Only ~6 h of CEEG would identify all neonates with ES in the low-risk group, whereas 75 and 63 h of CEEG would be required to identify 95% of neonates with ES in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Among neonates with HIE, a model employing two EEG variables from a 1-h screening EEG and stratifying neonates into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups could enable evidence-based strategies for targeted CEEG use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a model to predict electroencephalographic seizures in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia.\",\"authors\":\"Shavonne L Massey, Amanda G Sandoval Karamian, Mark P Fitzgerald, France W Fung, Abigail Abramson, Mandy K Salmon, Darshana Parikh, Nicholas S Abend\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electroencephalographic seizures (ES) are common in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), but identification with continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring (CEEG) is resource-intensive. We aimed to develop an ES prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospective observational study of 260 neonates with HIE undergoing CEEG, we identified clinical and EEG risk factors for ES, evaluated model performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and calculated test characteristics emphasizing high sensitivity. We assessed ES incidence and timing in neonates subdivided by ES risk group (low, moderate, high) as determined by EEG risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ES occurred in 32% (83/260) of neonates. Performing CEEG for only 24 h would fail to identify the 7% (17/260) of neonates with later onset ES (20% of all neonates experiencing ES). Identifying 90% or 95% of neonates with ES would require CEEG for 63 or 74 h, respectively. The optimal model included continuity and epileptiform discharges, both assessed in the initial 1 h of CEEG. It yielded an AUROC of .80, and at a cutoff that emphasized sensitivity, had sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 45%, positive predictive value of 44%, and negative predictive value of 95%. The model would avoid CEEG beyond 1 h in 32% (84/260) of neonates, but 6% (5/83) of neonates with ES would not have ES identified. ES incidence was significantly different (p < .01) across ES risk groups (6% low, 40% moderate, and 83% high). Only ~6 h of CEEG would identify all neonates with ES in the low-risk group, whereas 75 and 63 h of CEEG would be required to identify 95% of neonates with ES in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Among neonates with HIE, a model employing two EEG variables from a 1-h screening EEG and stratifying neonates into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups could enable evidence-based strategies for targeted CEEG use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18196\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脑电图癫痫发作(ES)在缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)新生儿中很常见,但通过连续脑电图(EEG)监测(CEEG)进行识别需要耗费大量资源。我们的目标是建立一个 ES 预测模型:通过对 260 名接受 CEEG 检查的 HIE 新生儿进行前瞻性观察研究,我们确定了 ES 的临床和脑电图风险因素,用接收者操作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 评估了模型的性能,并计算了强调高灵敏度的测试特征。我们根据脑电图风险因素确定的 ES 风险组别(低、中、高)对新生儿的 ES 发生率和时间进行了评估:结果:32%(83/260)的新生儿出现 ES。仅进行 24 小时的脑电图检查将无法识别 7%(17/260)的晚发 ES 新生儿(占所有 ES 新生儿的 20%)。要识别 90% 或 95% 的 ES 新生儿,分别需要 63 或 74 小时的 CEEG。最佳模型包括连续性和癫痫样放电,两者均在最初 1 小时的 CEEG 中进行评估。该模型的 AUROC 为 0.80,在强调灵敏度的临界值下,灵敏度为 94%,特异性为 45%,阳性预测值为 44%,阴性预测值为 95%。该模型可避免 32% 的新生儿(84/260)在 1 小时后接受 CEEG 检查,但有 6% 的 ES 新生儿(5/83)无法识别 ES。ES 发生率存在明显差异(p 有学意义:在患有 HIE 的新生儿中,采用 1 小时筛查脑电图中的两个脑电图变量并将新生儿分为低、中、高风险组的模型可为有针对性地使用 CEEG 提供循证策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a model to predict electroencephalographic seizures in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Objective: Electroencephalographic seizures (ES) are common in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), but identification with continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring (CEEG) is resource-intensive. We aimed to develop an ES prediction model.

Methods: Using a prospective observational study of 260 neonates with HIE undergoing CEEG, we identified clinical and EEG risk factors for ES, evaluated model performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and calculated test characteristics emphasizing high sensitivity. We assessed ES incidence and timing in neonates subdivided by ES risk group (low, moderate, high) as determined by EEG risk factors.

Results: ES occurred in 32% (83/260) of neonates. Performing CEEG for only 24 h would fail to identify the 7% (17/260) of neonates with later onset ES (20% of all neonates experiencing ES). Identifying 90% or 95% of neonates with ES would require CEEG for 63 or 74 h, respectively. The optimal model included continuity and epileptiform discharges, both assessed in the initial 1 h of CEEG. It yielded an AUROC of .80, and at a cutoff that emphasized sensitivity, had sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 45%, positive predictive value of 44%, and negative predictive value of 95%. The model would avoid CEEG beyond 1 h in 32% (84/260) of neonates, but 6% (5/83) of neonates with ES would not have ES identified. ES incidence was significantly different (p < .01) across ES risk groups (6% low, 40% moderate, and 83% high). Only ~6 h of CEEG would identify all neonates with ES in the low-risk group, whereas 75 and 63 h of CEEG would be required to identify 95% of neonates with ES in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups, respectively.

Significance: Among neonates with HIE, a model employing two EEG variables from a 1-h screening EEG and stratifying neonates into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups could enable evidence-based strategies for targeted CEEG use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信