Susan E Smith, Logan T Smith, Andrea Sikora, Trisha N Branan, Christopher M Bland, W Anthony Hawkins
{"title":"药物治疗方案复杂性与药剂师参与液体管理的关系。","authors":"Susan E Smith, Logan T Smith, Andrea Sikora, Trisha N Branan, Christopher M Bland, W Anthony Hawkins","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The medication regimen complexity intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score has previously been associated with pharmacist workload and fluid overload. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of MRC-ICU score with pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations as a means of establishing its role in risk stratifying critically ill patients for pharmacist intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients admitted to the medical ICU and followed by the academic pharmacy team were included in this retrospective, single-center cohort study. Patient and pharmacist data were collected via electronic medical record and surveillance tool, respectively. MRC-ICU and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were captured at ICU admission. The primary outcome was correlation between MRC-ICU score and number of pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations. Secondary outcomes included the relationships between MRC-ICU score, accepted recommendations, and patient outcomes (fluid overload and length of stay [LOS]). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Spearman's rank-order correlation was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 168 patients, 22 (13%) experienced fluid overload. Median MRC-ICU and SOFA scores were 13 and 7, respectively, and were higher for patients experiencing fluid overload than for those without fluid overload. MRC-ICU had a weakly positive correlation with the number of pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations (ρ = 0.200; P = 0.010), fluid overload (ρ = 0.167; P = 0.030), and ICU LOS (ρ = 0.354; P < 0.001). These relationships remained true when looking at only the fluid stewardship recommendations that were accepted by the team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRC-ICU displayed a weakly positive correlation with pharmacist workload, suggesting its potential use in identifying patients likely to benefit from pharmacist intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"e529-e535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between medication regimen complexity and pharmacist engagement in fluid stewardship.\",\"authors\":\"Susan E Smith, Logan T Smith, Andrea Sikora, Trisha N Branan, Christopher M Bland, W Anthony Hawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxae369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The medication regimen complexity intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score has previously been associated with pharmacist workload and fluid overload. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of MRC-ICU score with pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations as a means of establishing its role in risk stratifying critically ill patients for pharmacist intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients admitted to the medical ICU and followed by the academic pharmacy team were included in this retrospective, single-center cohort study. Patient and pharmacist data were collected via electronic medical record and surveillance tool, respectively. MRC-ICU and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were captured at ICU admission. The primary outcome was correlation between MRC-ICU score and number of pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations. Secondary outcomes included the relationships between MRC-ICU score, accepted recommendations, and patient outcomes (fluid overload and length of stay [LOS]). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Spearman's rank-order correlation was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 168 patients, 22 (13%) experienced fluid overload. Median MRC-ICU and SOFA scores were 13 and 7, respectively, and were higher for patients experiencing fluid overload than for those without fluid overload. MRC-ICU had a weakly positive correlation with the number of pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations (ρ = 0.200; P = 0.010), fluid overload (ρ = 0.167; P = 0.030), and ICU LOS (ρ = 0.354; P < 0.001). These relationships remained true when looking at only the fluid stewardship recommendations that were accepted by the team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRC-ICU displayed a weakly positive correlation with pharmacist workload, suggesting its potential use in identifying patients likely to benefit from pharmacist intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e529-e535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae369\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between medication regimen complexity and pharmacist engagement in fluid stewardship.
Purpose: The medication regimen complexity intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score has previously been associated with pharmacist workload and fluid overload. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of MRC-ICU score with pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations as a means of establishing its role in risk stratifying critically ill patients for pharmacist intervention.
Methods: Adult patients admitted to the medical ICU and followed by the academic pharmacy team were included in this retrospective, single-center cohort study. Patient and pharmacist data were collected via electronic medical record and surveillance tool, respectively. MRC-ICU and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were captured at ICU admission. The primary outcome was correlation between MRC-ICU score and number of pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations. Secondary outcomes included the relationships between MRC-ICU score, accepted recommendations, and patient outcomes (fluid overload and length of stay [LOS]). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Spearman's rank-order correlation was used.
Results: Of 168 patients, 22 (13%) experienced fluid overload. Median MRC-ICU and SOFA scores were 13 and 7, respectively, and were higher for patients experiencing fluid overload than for those without fluid overload. MRC-ICU had a weakly positive correlation with the number of pharmacist-driven fluid stewardship recommendations (ρ = 0.200; P = 0.010), fluid overload (ρ = 0.167; P = 0.030), and ICU LOS (ρ = 0.354; P < 0.001). These relationships remained true when looking at only the fluid stewardship recommendations that were accepted by the team.
Conclusion: MRC-ICU displayed a weakly positive correlation with pharmacist workload, suggesting its potential use in identifying patients likely to benefit from pharmacist intervention.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.