机器学习从动态沪深 300 指数成分股中选出的投资组合的业绩比较:前向调整股价与后向调整股价的比较

IF 3.4 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ligang Zhou, Xiaoguo Chen, Xiaolei Tang
{"title":"机器学习从动态沪深 300 指数成分股中选出的投资组合的业绩比较:前向调整股价与后向调整股价的比较","authors":"Ligang Zhou,&nbsp;Xiaoguo Chen,&nbsp;Xiaolei Tang","doi":"10.1007/s10489-024-06107-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most existing studies utilize backward-adjusted stock prices from data platforms to develop and backtest investment strategies using machine learning models. However, these prices are not point-in-time data and may introduce look-ahead bias, raising concerns about the reliability of model performance. To examine the impact of different price adjustment methods, we compare the predictive performance of various machine learning models and the backtesting results of portfolios constructed using these models with both forward-adjusted and backward-adjusted stock prices. Our study, conducted from 2012 to 2022, evaluates the real-world viability of investment strategies on the dynamic constituents of the CSI300 index. The empirical results reveal that while certain measures of machine learning models’ predictive performance may not be significantly affected by the stock price adjustment method, the backtesting performance under backward-adjusted stock prices is overestimated compared to that under forward-adjusted stock prices. This research provides evidence for the impact of historical stock price adjustments in developing machine learning models and presents a comprehensive framework for applying these techniques to the management of index constituent portfolios, thereby bridging the gap between predictive modeling and practical investment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8041,"journal":{"name":"Applied Intelligence","volume":"55 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative performance of machine learning-selected portfolios from dynamic CSI300 constituents: forward vs. backward adjusted stock prices\",\"authors\":\"Ligang Zhou,&nbsp;Xiaoguo Chen,&nbsp;Xiaolei Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10489-024-06107-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most existing studies utilize backward-adjusted stock prices from data platforms to develop and backtest investment strategies using machine learning models. However, these prices are not point-in-time data and may introduce look-ahead bias, raising concerns about the reliability of model performance. To examine the impact of different price adjustment methods, we compare the predictive performance of various machine learning models and the backtesting results of portfolios constructed using these models with both forward-adjusted and backward-adjusted stock prices. Our study, conducted from 2012 to 2022, evaluates the real-world viability of investment strategies on the dynamic constituents of the CSI300 index. The empirical results reveal that while certain measures of machine learning models’ predictive performance may not be significantly affected by the stock price adjustment method, the backtesting performance under backward-adjusted stock prices is overestimated compared to that under forward-adjusted stock prices. This research provides evidence for the impact of historical stock price adjustments in developing machine learning models and presents a comprehensive framework for applying these techniques to the management of index constituent portfolios, thereby bridging the gap between predictive modeling and practical investment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-024-06107-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-024-06107-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative performance of machine learning-selected portfolios from dynamic CSI300 constituents: forward vs. backward adjusted stock prices

Most existing studies utilize backward-adjusted stock prices from data platforms to develop and backtest investment strategies using machine learning models. However, these prices are not point-in-time data and may introduce look-ahead bias, raising concerns about the reliability of model performance. To examine the impact of different price adjustment methods, we compare the predictive performance of various machine learning models and the backtesting results of portfolios constructed using these models with both forward-adjusted and backward-adjusted stock prices. Our study, conducted from 2012 to 2022, evaluates the real-world viability of investment strategies on the dynamic constituents of the CSI300 index. The empirical results reveal that while certain measures of machine learning models’ predictive performance may not be significantly affected by the stock price adjustment method, the backtesting performance under backward-adjusted stock prices is overestimated compared to that under forward-adjusted stock prices. This research provides evidence for the impact of historical stock price adjustments in developing machine learning models and presents a comprehensive framework for applying these techniques to the management of index constituent portfolios, thereby bridging the gap between predictive modeling and practical investment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Intelligence
Applied Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.80%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: With a focus on research in artificial intelligence and neural networks, this journal addresses issues involving solutions of real-life manufacturing, defense, management, government and industrial problems which are too complex to be solved through conventional approaches and require the simulation of intelligent thought processes, heuristics, applications of knowledge, and distributed and parallel processing. The integration of these multiple approaches in solving complex problems is of particular importance. The journal presents new and original research and technological developments, addressing real and complex issues applicable to difficult problems. It provides a medium for exchanging scientific research and technological achievements accomplished by the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信