作为印度尼西亚认证和非认证可可种植园生物多样性替代物的声学指数

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Saskia Dröge, Lilik Budi Prasetyo, Bart Muys
{"title":"作为印度尼西亚认证和非认证可可种植园生物多样性替代物的声学指数","authors":"Saskia Dröge,&nbsp;Lilik Budi Prasetyo,&nbsp;Bart Muys","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13441-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acoustic indices allow time efficient analysis of large acoustic datasets obtained from passive acoustic monitoring, but results regarding their effectiveness in assessing biodiversity are inconsistent. We evaluated the efficacy of six acoustic indices (ACI, ADI, AEI, H, BI, NDSI) for studying bird and structural diversity in 51 cocoa plantations, 24 of which were certified by Rainforest Alliance, in Luwu Timur, Sulawesi, Indonesia. We used linear models to assess the correlation of index values with bird species richness, and linear mixed models to test the influence of canopy closure, shade tree basal area, distance to primary forest and tree cover in a 200-m buffer on index values. Bird species richness was positively correlated with BI (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and negatively with H (<i>p</i> = 0.03), yet predictive power was low (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.10 and 0.09, respectively). Acoustic indices did not differ significantly for certified cocoa plantations. Tree cover within the 200-m buffer moderately well predicted ACI values (marginal <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.37) while for the other indices effect sizes were low or correlations were not significant. Comparing our results to other studies, acoustic indices may reflect biodiversity across land uses, but were of limited value for tracking subtle differences in cocoa plantations in Sulawesi. Future studies may include more land uses (i.e. rice paddies, secondary forest, oil palm) as well as more taxa (i.e. insects). More research is needed on the comparability of acoustic indices, as we found them to be influenced by recording equipment and calculation settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity in certified and non-certified cocoa plantations in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Saskia Dröge,&nbsp;Lilik Budi Prasetyo,&nbsp;Bart Muys\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-024-13441-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Acoustic indices allow time efficient analysis of large acoustic datasets obtained from passive acoustic monitoring, but results regarding their effectiveness in assessing biodiversity are inconsistent. We evaluated the efficacy of six acoustic indices (ACI, ADI, AEI, H, BI, NDSI) for studying bird and structural diversity in 51 cocoa plantations, 24 of which were certified by Rainforest Alliance, in Luwu Timur, Sulawesi, Indonesia. We used linear models to assess the correlation of index values with bird species richness, and linear mixed models to test the influence of canopy closure, shade tree basal area, distance to primary forest and tree cover in a 200-m buffer on index values. Bird species richness was positively correlated with BI (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and negatively with H (<i>p</i> = 0.03), yet predictive power was low (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.10 and 0.09, respectively). Acoustic indices did not differ significantly for certified cocoa plantations. Tree cover within the 200-m buffer moderately well predicted ACI values (marginal <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.37) while for the other indices effect sizes were low or correlations were not significant. Comparing our results to other studies, acoustic indices may reflect biodiversity across land uses, but were of limited value for tracking subtle differences in cocoa plantations in Sulawesi. Future studies may include more land uses (i.e. rice paddies, secondary forest, oil palm) as well as more taxa (i.e. insects). More research is needed on the comparability of acoustic indices, as we found them to be influenced by recording equipment and calculation settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13441-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13441-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

声学指数允许对从被动声学监测中获得的大型声学数据集进行时间效率分析,但关于其评估生物多样性的有效性的结果并不一致。在印度尼西亚苏拉威西岛鲁吴铁木的51个可可种植园(其中24个获得雨林联盟认证)中,对6个声学指数(ACI、ADI、AEI、H、BI、NDSI)用于研究鸟类和结构多样性的有效性进行了评价。利用线性模型评估了指数与鸟类物种丰富度的相关性,并利用线性混合模型研究了冠层封闭、遮荫树基底面积、与原生林的距离和200 m缓冲区树木覆盖对指数的影响。鸟类物种丰富度与BI呈显著正相关(p = 0.02),与H呈显著负相关(p = 0.03),但预测能力较低(R2分别为0.10和0.09)。经认证的可可种植园的声学指数差异不显著。200 m缓冲区内的树木覆盖对ACI值的预测较好(边际R2 = 0.37),而其他指标的效应值较低或相关性不显著。将我们的研究结果与其他研究结果进行比较,声学指数可以反映不同土地利用方式的生物多样性,但在追踪苏拉威西岛可可种植园的细微差异方面价值有限。未来的研究可能包括更多的土地用途(如稻田、次生林、油棕)以及更多的分类群(如昆虫)。由于我们发现声学指标受到记录设备和计算设置的影响,因此需要对声学指标的可比性进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity in certified and non-certified cocoa plantations in Indonesia

Acoustic indices allow time efficient analysis of large acoustic datasets obtained from passive acoustic monitoring, but results regarding their effectiveness in assessing biodiversity are inconsistent. We evaluated the efficacy of six acoustic indices (ACI, ADI, AEI, H, BI, NDSI) for studying bird and structural diversity in 51 cocoa plantations, 24 of which were certified by Rainforest Alliance, in Luwu Timur, Sulawesi, Indonesia. We used linear models to assess the correlation of index values with bird species richness, and linear mixed models to test the influence of canopy closure, shade tree basal area, distance to primary forest and tree cover in a 200-m buffer on index values. Bird species richness was positively correlated with BI (p = 0.02) and negatively with H (p = 0.03), yet predictive power was low (R2 = 0.10 and 0.09, respectively). Acoustic indices did not differ significantly for certified cocoa plantations. Tree cover within the 200-m buffer moderately well predicted ACI values (marginal R2 = 0.37) while for the other indices effect sizes were low or correlations were not significant. Comparing our results to other studies, acoustic indices may reflect biodiversity across land uses, but were of limited value for tracking subtle differences in cocoa plantations in Sulawesi. Future studies may include more land uses (i.e. rice paddies, secondary forest, oil palm) as well as more taxa (i.e. insects). More research is needed on the comparability of acoustic indices, as we found them to be influenced by recording equipment and calculation settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信