Selma Ghomari, Charlotte Serrano, Amélie Beaugrand, Maud Gelly
{"title":"将Covid-19疫苗接种委托给私人在线预约平台对疫苗获取的不平等影响:法国案例","authors":"Selma Ghomari, Charlotte Serrano, Amélie Beaugrand, Maud Gelly","doi":"10.1177/13634593241306574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A great deal of research has shown that health inequalities are the product of socially unequal wear and tear of bodies, socially differentiated use of the healthcare system and unequal access to care, as well as healthcare professionals' differentiating practices. However, public policies are rarely the focus of recent investigations on the production of health inequalities. How can public policies produce or even amplify health inequalities, but also reduce them, or fail to do so? This study aims to investigate the impact of online appointment booking on effective access to Covid-19 vaccination. Through a quantitative survey of the first weeks of vaccination against Covid-19 in 2021 in an undeserved French suburb called Seine-Saint-Denis, this paper shows how the vaccination policy has contributed to reproducing and amplifying inequalities towards Covid-19: middle and upper classes are significantly more represented among people vaccinated (67%) than in the population of Seine-SaintDenis (41%), and working classes are significantly less represented (33%) than in Seine-Saint-Denis (59%). The people vaccinated are more highly educated and more often French than the population of SeineSaint-Denis. Online appointment favoured more educated people.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593241306574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inegalitarian effects on access to vaccines of delegating Covid-19 vaccination to a private online appointment platform: The French case.\",\"authors\":\"Selma Ghomari, Charlotte Serrano, Amélie Beaugrand, Maud Gelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634593241306574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A great deal of research has shown that health inequalities are the product of socially unequal wear and tear of bodies, socially differentiated use of the healthcare system and unequal access to care, as well as healthcare professionals' differentiating practices. However, public policies are rarely the focus of recent investigations on the production of health inequalities. How can public policies produce or even amplify health inequalities, but also reduce them, or fail to do so? This study aims to investigate the impact of online appointment booking on effective access to Covid-19 vaccination. Through a quantitative survey of the first weeks of vaccination against Covid-19 in 2021 in an undeserved French suburb called Seine-Saint-Denis, this paper shows how the vaccination policy has contributed to reproducing and amplifying inequalities towards Covid-19: middle and upper classes are significantly more represented among people vaccinated (67%) than in the population of Seine-SaintDenis (41%), and working classes are significantly less represented (33%) than in Seine-Saint-Denis (59%). The people vaccinated are more highly educated and more often French than the population of SeineSaint-Denis. Online appointment favoured more educated people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13634593241306574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593241306574\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593241306574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inegalitarian effects on access to vaccines of delegating Covid-19 vaccination to a private online appointment platform: The French case.
A great deal of research has shown that health inequalities are the product of socially unequal wear and tear of bodies, socially differentiated use of the healthcare system and unequal access to care, as well as healthcare professionals' differentiating practices. However, public policies are rarely the focus of recent investigations on the production of health inequalities. How can public policies produce or even amplify health inequalities, but also reduce them, or fail to do so? This study aims to investigate the impact of online appointment booking on effective access to Covid-19 vaccination. Through a quantitative survey of the first weeks of vaccination against Covid-19 in 2021 in an undeserved French suburb called Seine-Saint-Denis, this paper shows how the vaccination policy has contributed to reproducing and amplifying inequalities towards Covid-19: middle and upper classes are significantly more represented among people vaccinated (67%) than in the population of Seine-SaintDenis (41%), and working classes are significantly less represented (33%) than in Seine-Saint-Denis (59%). The people vaccinated are more highly educated and more often French than the population of SeineSaint-Denis. Online appointment favoured more educated people.
期刊介绍:
Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.