基于螺旋环介导等温扩增技术(HAMP)的鸡肉产品中产气荚膜梭菌快速肉眼检测方法的建立和应用。

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yuheng Yang, Long Du, Congcong Li, Xinxiao Zhang, Fang Liu, Daoying Wang, Zhilan Sun, Songsong Zhao
{"title":"基于螺旋环介导等温扩增技术(HAMP)的鸡肉产品中产气荚膜梭菌快速肉眼检测方法的建立和应用。","authors":"Yuheng Yang, Long Du, Congcong Li, Xinxiao Zhang, Fang Liu, Daoying Wang, Zhilan Sun, Songsong Zhao","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.17556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clostridium perfringens is a significant foodborne pathogen in chicken products. Rapid on-site detection of C. perfringens is crucial for mitigating the incidence of foodborne illnesses by enabling the prompt identification and recall of contaminated food products. A rapid and visual detection method for C. perfringens in chicken products was developed using helical loop-mediated isothermal amplification (HAMP) technology combined with SYBR Green I fluorescent staining. The reaction temperature, time, and reagent concentrations of HAMP technique were optimized firstly. HAMP displayed high specificity, effectively distinguishing C. perfringens from 18 other common pathogens in chicken products. HAMP also exhibited higher sensitivity (78 fg/µL) compared to endpoint PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The detection limit of HAMP for non-enriched samples was 6.8 × 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/g, which improved to 68 and 6.8 CFU/g after 5 and 10 h of enrichment, respectively. The detection limit of HAMP was lower by 2 and 1 orders of magnitude compared to endpoint PCR and qPCR under the same conditions. On-site testing of commercially available ready-to-eat chicken products showed that HAMP had the same results as traditional culture methods, indicating the significant potential of HAMP for on-site detection of C. perfringens. This method offered a rapid, accurate, and visual means of detecting C. perfringens in chicken products, making it well-suited for on-site testing. This research represented the first use of the HAMP method for detecting C. perfringens.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment and application of a rapid visual detection method for Clostridium perfringens in chicken products based on helical loop-mediated isothermal amplification (HAMP).\",\"authors\":\"Yuheng Yang, Long Du, Congcong Li, Xinxiao Zhang, Fang Liu, Daoying Wang, Zhilan Sun, Songsong Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.17556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clostridium perfringens is a significant foodborne pathogen in chicken products. Rapid on-site detection of C. perfringens is crucial for mitigating the incidence of foodborne illnesses by enabling the prompt identification and recall of contaminated food products. A rapid and visual detection method for C. perfringens in chicken products was developed using helical loop-mediated isothermal amplification (HAMP) technology combined with SYBR Green I fluorescent staining. The reaction temperature, time, and reagent concentrations of HAMP technique were optimized firstly. HAMP displayed high specificity, effectively distinguishing C. perfringens from 18 other common pathogens in chicken products. HAMP also exhibited higher sensitivity (78 fg/µL) compared to endpoint PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The detection limit of HAMP for non-enriched samples was 6.8 × 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/g, which improved to 68 and 6.8 CFU/g after 5 and 10 h of enrichment, respectively. The detection limit of HAMP was lower by 2 and 1 orders of magnitude compared to endpoint PCR and qPCR under the same conditions. On-site testing of commercially available ready-to-eat chicken products showed that HAMP had the same results as traditional culture methods, indicating the significant potential of HAMP for on-site detection of C. perfringens. This method offered a rapid, accurate, and visual means of detecting C. perfringens in chicken products, making it well-suited for on-site testing. This research represented the first use of the HAMP method for detecting C. perfringens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.17556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.17556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment and application of a rapid visual detection method for Clostridium perfringens in chicken products based on helical loop-mediated isothermal amplification (HAMP).

Clostridium perfringens is a significant foodborne pathogen in chicken products. Rapid on-site detection of C. perfringens is crucial for mitigating the incidence of foodborne illnesses by enabling the prompt identification and recall of contaminated food products. A rapid and visual detection method for C. perfringens in chicken products was developed using helical loop-mediated isothermal amplification (HAMP) technology combined with SYBR Green I fluorescent staining. The reaction temperature, time, and reagent concentrations of HAMP technique were optimized firstly. HAMP displayed high specificity, effectively distinguishing C. perfringens from 18 other common pathogens in chicken products. HAMP also exhibited higher sensitivity (78 fg/µL) compared to endpoint PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The detection limit of HAMP for non-enriched samples was 6.8 × 102 CFU/g, which improved to 68 and 6.8 CFU/g after 5 and 10 h of enrichment, respectively. The detection limit of HAMP was lower by 2 and 1 orders of magnitude compared to endpoint PCR and qPCR under the same conditions. On-site testing of commercially available ready-to-eat chicken products showed that HAMP had the same results as traditional culture methods, indicating the significant potential of HAMP for on-site detection of C. perfringens. This method offered a rapid, accurate, and visual means of detecting C. perfringens in chicken products, making it well-suited for on-site testing. This research represented the first use of the HAMP method for detecting C. perfringens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信