强化护士家访对产后避孕药具使用和生育间隔的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005786
Maria W Steenland, Dea Oviedo, Mary Ann Bates, Annetta Zhou, Chloe Zera, Katherine Baicker, Margaret A McConnell
{"title":"强化护士家访对产后避孕药具使用和生育间隔的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Maria W Steenland, Dea Oviedo, Mary Ann Bates, Annetta Zhou, Chloe Zera, Katherine Baicker, Margaret A McConnell","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"145 1","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of an Intensive Nurse Home Visiting Program on Postpartum Contraceptive Use and Birth Spacing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maria W Steenland, Dea Oviedo, Mary Ann Bates, Annetta Zhou, Chloe Zera, Katherine Baicker, Margaret A McConnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"3-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005786\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005786","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估强化护士家访计划对南卡罗来纳州符合医疗补助保险条件的首次怀孕个体产后避孕药具使用和生育间隔的影响。方法:我们对护士-家庭合作(NFP)进行了一项非盲、随机对照试验,NFP是一项已建立的强化家访计划,在分娩后2年内提供产前和产后家访。该试验包括在2016年4月1日至2020年3月17日期间首次怀孕少于28周的有资格获得医疗补助保险的患者,并在分娩后随访2年。与标准护理治疗相比,参与者按2:1随机分为NFP组。主要结局是首次妊娠和随后分娩之间的分娩间隔小于21个月。次要结果是生育间隔小于15和24个月,产后立即接受避孕植入或宫内节育器(IUD),任何避孕措施的使用和接受计划生育访问(产后6周和1年),以及产后1年接受宫内节育器。我们使用关联的出生证明记录和医疗补助申请数据来评估结果。结果:共有4932名受试者(干预组3295人,对照组1637人)纳入研究分析。在研究指标出生后的21个月内,NFP组中11.0%的个体和常规护理组中12.2%的个体随后出生。NFP对小于21个月的出生间隔无统计学显著影响(校正系数-1.1,95% CI, -2.9至0.8)。在与生育间隔和产后避孕药使用相关的八个次要结果中,NFP组和对照组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:注册护士家访对产后避孕药具的使用和生育间隔没有影响。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of an Intensive Nurse Home Visiting Program on Postpartum Contraceptive Use and Birth Spacing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina.

Methods: We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data.

Results: A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use.

Conclusion: Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信