以色列 "在家的力量 "随机对照试验方案:基于社会信息处理模型的亲密伴侣暴力创伤知情干预。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ohad Gilbar, Liron Cohen, Madeline Smethurst, Suzannah Creech, Ziv Azaria-Mizrachi, Naomi Ben-Gal, Casey Taft
{"title":"以色列 \"在家的力量 \"随机对照试验方案:基于社会信息处理模型的亲密伴侣暴力创伤知情干预。","authors":"Ohad Gilbar, Liron Cohen, Madeline Smethurst, Suzannah Creech, Ziv Azaria-Mizrachi, Naomi Ben-Gal, Casey Taft","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The social information processing (SIP) model of trauma and intimate partner violence (IPV), which emphasizes the impact of trauma on one's ability to accurately process social information and subsequent failure to generate and enact nonaggressive responses, has gained attention in the United States. Recent clinical trial evidence suggests that the Strength at Home (SAH) intervention, a 12-session program that is based on this model, is efficacious in reducing and ending abusive behavior among U.S. veterans. However, such a clinical trial has yet to be conducted among a civilian population nor in a different cultural context (e.g., Israel). This paper describes the methods of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of SAH compared to a treatment as usual comparison condition in Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>300 men referred (court-, clinically-, and self-referred) to IPV intervention from adult outpatient clinics at Social Affairs and Social Services offices in Israel will be randomly assigned to the SAH intervention or a treatment-as-usual comparison group. Outcomes are measured at six timepoints (baseline, post-treatment, and four 3-month follow-ups). The primary outcome is use of IPV; however, we will also examine reductions in SIP deficits. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety, and changes in emotion regulation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings will determine the efficacy of SAH in a civilian population and in a different cultural context. Additionally, findings will determine whether SIP is a mechanism of change for such intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"107775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of strength at home in Israel: A trauma informed intervention for intimate partner violence based on a social-information processing model.\",\"authors\":\"Ohad Gilbar, Liron Cohen, Madeline Smethurst, Suzannah Creech, Ziv Azaria-Mizrachi, Naomi Ben-Gal, Casey Taft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The social information processing (SIP) model of trauma and intimate partner violence (IPV), which emphasizes the impact of trauma on one's ability to accurately process social information and subsequent failure to generate and enact nonaggressive responses, has gained attention in the United States. Recent clinical trial evidence suggests that the Strength at Home (SAH) intervention, a 12-session program that is based on this model, is efficacious in reducing and ending abusive behavior among U.S. veterans. However, such a clinical trial has yet to be conducted among a civilian population nor in a different cultural context (e.g., Israel). This paper describes the methods of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of SAH compared to a treatment as usual comparison condition in Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>300 men referred (court-, clinically-, and self-referred) to IPV intervention from adult outpatient clinics at Social Affairs and Social Services offices in Israel will be randomly assigned to the SAH intervention or a treatment-as-usual comparison group. Outcomes are measured at six timepoints (baseline, post-treatment, and four 3-month follow-ups). The primary outcome is use of IPV; however, we will also examine reductions in SIP deficits. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety, and changes in emotion regulation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings will determine the efficacy of SAH in a civilian population and in a different cultural context. Additionally, findings will determine whether SIP is a mechanism of change for such intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤和亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的社会信息处理模型(SIP)强调创伤对一个人准确处理社会信息的能力的影响,以及随之而来的无法产生和实施非攻击性反应的问题。最近的临床试验证据表明,"在家的力量"(SAH)干预--一个基于该模式的 12 节课程--对于减少和终止美国退伍军人的虐待行为是有效的。然而,这样的临床试验尚未在平民群体中或不同的文化背景下(如以色列)进行过。本文介绍了一项随机对照试验的方法,该试验旨在测试 SAH 在以色列与常规治疗对比条件下的疗效。方法:将从以色列社会事务和社会服务办公室的成人门诊诊所转介 300 名男性(法院转介、临床转介和自我转介)到 IPV 干预组,并随机分配到 SAH 干预组或常规治疗对比组。结果将在六个时间点(基线、治疗后和四个为期三个月的随访)进行测量。主要结果是使用 IPV;但是,我们也将检查 SIP 缺陷的减少情况。次要结果包括创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁和焦虑症状,以及情绪调节策略的变化:研究结果将确定 SAH 在平民群体和不同文化背景下的疗效。此外,研究结果还将确定 SIP 是否是此类干预的改变机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of strength at home in Israel: A trauma informed intervention for intimate partner violence based on a social-information processing model.

Background: The social information processing (SIP) model of trauma and intimate partner violence (IPV), which emphasizes the impact of trauma on one's ability to accurately process social information and subsequent failure to generate and enact nonaggressive responses, has gained attention in the United States. Recent clinical trial evidence suggests that the Strength at Home (SAH) intervention, a 12-session program that is based on this model, is efficacious in reducing and ending abusive behavior among U.S. veterans. However, such a clinical trial has yet to be conducted among a civilian population nor in a different cultural context (e.g., Israel). This paper describes the methods of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of SAH compared to a treatment as usual comparison condition in Israel.

Methods: 300 men referred (court-, clinically-, and self-referred) to IPV intervention from adult outpatient clinics at Social Affairs and Social Services offices in Israel will be randomly assigned to the SAH intervention or a treatment-as-usual comparison group. Outcomes are measured at six timepoints (baseline, post-treatment, and four 3-month follow-ups). The primary outcome is use of IPV; however, we will also examine reductions in SIP deficits. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety, and changes in emotion regulation strategies.

Conclusion: Study findings will determine the efficacy of SAH in a civilian population and in a different cultural context. Additionally, findings will determine whether SIP is a mechanism of change for such intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信