Z.-Hye Lee, Austin Y. Ha, John W. Shuck, Edward I. Chang, Rene D. Largo, Matthew H. Hanasono, Patrick B. Garvey, Peirong Yu
{"title":"用旋臂(螺旋桨)皮瓣关闭骨皮腓骨皮瓣供区:解剖学考虑和手术指征。","authors":"Z.-Hye Lee, Austin Y. Ha, John W. Shuck, Edward I. Chang, Rene D. Largo, Matthew H. Hanasono, Patrick B. Garvey, Peirong Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Skin graft is frequently used for donor site closure after osteocutaneous fibula free flap (OCFFF) harvest when primary closure is not possible. Partial skin graft loss requiring wound care is a common complication. The purposes of this prospective study were to investigate the perforator anatomy for local propeller or tonearm flap closure and compare the outcomes to those of skin graft closure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients undergoing OCFFF for head and neck reconstruction from February 2022 to October 2023 were considered for the tonearm flap. Intraoperative perforator anatomy was prospectively recorded. Surgical techniques and criteria for tonearm flap reconstruction were described. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was required. Outcome measures included the rate of flap success and wound complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty consecutive patients were included. The tonearm flap was not possible in 16 patients (40%) due to unfavorable perforator anatomy and 2 patients underwent primary closure. All successful tonearm flaps were eccentrically designed on a proximal lower leg perforator, located 13.5 ± 1.99 cm from the fibular head. Most proximal perforators were musculocutaneous through the soleus muscle (n = 20, 90.9%), whereas the rest were septocutaneous (n = 2, 9.1%), originating from the peroneal artery. Three patients experienced distal partial flap loss; one required an additional skin graft. Only half of the skin graft cohort (n = 99, 50.8%) achieved complete skin graft take. The average skin graft loss was 34.3%, and wound care was required for an average period of 51.6±52.8 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study findings demonstrate that local tonearm flaps, when anatomically feasible, can be successfully performed with superior outcomes compared to skin graft closures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"100 ","pages":"Pages 240-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closure of the osteocutaneous fibula flap donor site with a tonearm (propeller) flap: Anatomic considerations and surgical indications\",\"authors\":\"Z.-Hye Lee, Austin Y. Ha, John W. Shuck, Edward I. Chang, Rene D. Largo, Matthew H. Hanasono, Patrick B. Garvey, Peirong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Skin graft is frequently used for donor site closure after osteocutaneous fibula free flap (OCFFF) harvest when primary closure is not possible. Partial skin graft loss requiring wound care is a common complication. The purposes of this prospective study were to investigate the perforator anatomy for local propeller or tonearm flap closure and compare the outcomes to those of skin graft closure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients undergoing OCFFF for head and neck reconstruction from February 2022 to October 2023 were considered for the tonearm flap. Intraoperative perforator anatomy was prospectively recorded. Surgical techniques and criteria for tonearm flap reconstruction were described. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was required. Outcome measures included the rate of flap success and wound complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty consecutive patients were included. The tonearm flap was not possible in 16 patients (40%) due to unfavorable perforator anatomy and 2 patients underwent primary closure. All successful tonearm flaps were eccentrically designed on a proximal lower leg perforator, located 13.5 ± 1.99 cm from the fibular head. Most proximal perforators were musculocutaneous through the soleus muscle (n = 20, 90.9%), whereas the rest were septocutaneous (n = 2, 9.1%), originating from the peroneal artery. Three patients experienced distal partial flap loss; one required an additional skin graft. Only half of the skin graft cohort (n = 99, 50.8%) achieved complete skin graft take. The average skin graft loss was 34.3%, and wound care was required for an average period of 51.6±52.8 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study findings demonstrate that local tonearm flaps, when anatomically feasible, can be successfully performed with superior outcomes compared to skin graft closures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 240-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174868152400740X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174868152400740X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Closure of the osteocutaneous fibula flap donor site with a tonearm (propeller) flap: Anatomic considerations and surgical indications
Background
Skin graft is frequently used for donor site closure after osteocutaneous fibula free flap (OCFFF) harvest when primary closure is not possible. Partial skin graft loss requiring wound care is a common complication. The purposes of this prospective study were to investigate the perforator anatomy for local propeller or tonearm flap closure and compare the outcomes to those of skin graft closure.
Methods
All patients undergoing OCFFF for head and neck reconstruction from February 2022 to October 2023 were considered for the tonearm flap. Intraoperative perforator anatomy was prospectively recorded. Surgical techniques and criteria for tonearm flap reconstruction were described. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was required. Outcome measures included the rate of flap success and wound complications.
Results
Forty consecutive patients were included. The tonearm flap was not possible in 16 patients (40%) due to unfavorable perforator anatomy and 2 patients underwent primary closure. All successful tonearm flaps were eccentrically designed on a proximal lower leg perforator, located 13.5 ± 1.99 cm from the fibular head. Most proximal perforators were musculocutaneous through the soleus muscle (n = 20, 90.9%), whereas the rest were septocutaneous (n = 2, 9.1%), originating from the peroneal artery. Three patients experienced distal partial flap loss; one required an additional skin graft. Only half of the skin graft cohort (n = 99, 50.8%) achieved complete skin graft take. The average skin graft loss was 34.3%, and wound care was required for an average period of 51.6±52.8 days.
Conclusions
The study findings demonstrate that local tonearm flaps, when anatomically feasible, can be successfully performed with superior outcomes compared to skin graft closures.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.