学龄早产儿和青少年的非药物干预和神经发育结果:一项系统综述。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Russia Ha-Vinh Leuchter, Vanessa Siffredi
{"title":"学龄早产儿和青少年的非药物干预和神经发育结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Russia Ha-Vinh Leuchter, Vanessa Siffredi","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review nonpharmaceutical interventions aiming to enhance neurodevelopment in preterm children and adolescents (aged 4-18 years).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted for all studies published up to May 1, 2022, across Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers using predetermined inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) tools were used to assess bias in the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1778 articles identified, 23 were included. Quality assessment revealed moderate bias in 52.2%, low bias in 21.7%, and serious bias in 26.1%. The selected studies comprised 60.9% randomized controlled trials and 21.7% pre- versus postdesigns. Interventions included Cogmed Working Memory Training® (43.5%), BrainGame Brian (13%), physiotherapy (13%), and others (30.4%). Qualitative analysis showed the limited impact of interventions on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children aged 4-18 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite recent efforts to use more rigorous methodologies, current research on school-age interventions for preterm neurodevelopment exhibits methodological limitations. There is a pressing need for well-designed, large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"45 6","pages":"e585-e595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonpharmaceutical Interventions and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in School-Age Preterm Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Russia Ha-Vinh Leuchter, Vanessa Siffredi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review nonpharmaceutical interventions aiming to enhance neurodevelopment in preterm children and adolescents (aged 4-18 years).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted for all studies published up to May 1, 2022, across Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers using predetermined inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) tools were used to assess bias in the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1778 articles identified, 23 were included. Quality assessment revealed moderate bias in 52.2%, low bias in 21.7%, and serious bias in 26.1%. The selected studies comprised 60.9% randomized controlled trials and 21.7% pre- versus postdesigns. Interventions included Cogmed Working Memory Training® (43.5%), BrainGame Brian (13%), physiotherapy (13%), and others (30.4%). Qualitative analysis showed the limited impact of interventions on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children aged 4-18 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite recent efforts to use more rigorous methodologies, current research on school-age interventions for preterm neurodevelopment exhibits methodological limitations. There is a pressing need for well-designed, large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions in this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"e585-e595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统回顾旨在促进早产儿和青少年(4-18 岁)神经发育的非药物干预措施:系统回顾旨在促进早产儿和青少年(4-18 岁)神经发育的非药物干预方法:对 Medline、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 数据库中截至 2022 年 5 月 1 日发表的所有研究进行了系统性的文献综述。由两名独立审稿人采用预先确定的纳入标准对研究进行评估。使用 "干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险"(Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions)和用于随机试验的科克伦偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)来评估所选研究的偏倚:在确定的 1778 篇文章中,有 23 篇被纳入。质量评估显示,52.2%的文章存在中度偏倚,21.7%的文章存在低度偏倚,26.1%的文章存在严重偏倚。所选研究中,60.9%为随机对照试验,21.7%为前后设计对比试验。干预措施包括 Cogmed Working Memory Training®(43.5%)、BrainGame Brian(13%)、物理治疗(13%)和其他(30.4%)。定性分析显示,干预措施对4-18岁早产儿神经发育结果的影响有限:尽管最近在努力使用更严格的方法,但目前针对学龄期早产儿神经发育干预的研究仍存在方法上的局限性。目前迫切需要设计完善的大规模临床试验来评估非药物干预对这一弱势群体的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonpharmaceutical Interventions and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in School-Age Preterm Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Objective: To systematically review nonpharmaceutical interventions aiming to enhance neurodevelopment in preterm children and adolescents (aged 4-18 years).

Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for all studies published up to May 1, 2022, across Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers using predetermined inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) tools were used to assess bias in the selected studies.

Results: Of the 1778 articles identified, 23 were included. Quality assessment revealed moderate bias in 52.2%, low bias in 21.7%, and serious bias in 26.1%. The selected studies comprised 60.9% randomized controlled trials and 21.7% pre- versus postdesigns. Interventions included Cogmed Working Memory Training® (43.5%), BrainGame Brian (13%), physiotherapy (13%), and others (30.4%). Qualitative analysis showed the limited impact of interventions on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children aged 4-18 years.

Conclusion: Despite recent efforts to use more rigorous methodologies, current research on school-age interventions for preterm neurodevelopment exhibits methodological limitations. There is a pressing need for well-designed, large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions in this vulnerable population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信