加利福尼亚州 "全人护理 "试点项目的可持续性,通过新开发的医疗补助福利,为医疗补助计划的参保者整合医疗和社会服务。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nadia Safaeinili, Emmeline Chuang, Mark Fleming, Shoba Ramanadhan, Nadereh Pourat, Amanda Brewster
{"title":"加利福尼亚州 \"全人护理 \"试点项目的可持续性,通过新开发的医疗补助福利,为医疗补助计划的参保者整合医疗和社会服务。","authors":"Nadia Safaeinili, Emmeline Chuang, Mark Fleming, Shoba Ramanadhan, Nadereh Pourat, Amanda Brewster","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess multi-level factors influencing the sustainability of 26 social care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees across California in newly developed Medicaid benefits.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This qualitative study assessed the sustainability of Whole Person Care (WPC) pilots implemented between 2016 and 2021. Pilots (n = 26) represented a majority of counties in California.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Primary qualitative data were collected between June and August 2021 and included 58 hour-long, semi-structured individual and group interviews with administrators, middle managers, and frontline case management staff representing all WPC pilots. We used hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis to identify and analyze patterns, and outliers, in factors influencing sustainment. Deductive codes included established implementation science factors influencing the sustainability of new programs (e.g., innovation characteristics, capacity, processes and interactions, and context).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Of 26 WPC pilots, 22 pilots sustained WPC by contracting with Medicaid managed care plans to provide services as part of newly developed Medicaid benefits. Three pilots chose not to sustain before the pilot period ended and one pilot decided not to sustain following completion of the full pilot. Factors influencing sustainability included: (1) program adaptability and flexibility; (2) funding structure and reimbursement requirements; (3) shared leadership with managed care plans; and (4) whether pilots chose to build out program infrastructure internally or contracted out core components to partner organizations. Many pilots, particularly those in rural areas, indicated that system and policy changes introduced as part of transitioning pilot services into Medicaid benefits reduced the sustainability of WPC for participating providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multi-level factors including program adaptability, funding, leadership, and capacity to build out infrastructure influenced the sustainability of WPC pilots. These findings have significant implications for health equity as equitable distribution of services, resources, and benefits from these programs can be supported through sustained implementation over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of California's Whole Person Care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees via newly developed Medicaid benefits.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Safaeinili, Emmeline Chuang, Mark Fleming, Shoba Ramanadhan, Nadereh Pourat, Amanda Brewster\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess multi-level factors influencing the sustainability of 26 social care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees across California in newly developed Medicaid benefits.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This qualitative study assessed the sustainability of Whole Person Care (WPC) pilots implemented between 2016 and 2021. Pilots (n = 26) represented a majority of counties in California.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Primary qualitative data were collected between June and August 2021 and included 58 hour-long, semi-structured individual and group interviews with administrators, middle managers, and frontline case management staff representing all WPC pilots. We used hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis to identify and analyze patterns, and outliers, in factors influencing sustainment. Deductive codes included established implementation science factors influencing the sustainability of new programs (e.g., innovation characteristics, capacity, processes and interactions, and context).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Of 26 WPC pilots, 22 pilots sustained WPC by contracting with Medicaid managed care plans to provide services as part of newly developed Medicaid benefits. Three pilots chose not to sustain before the pilot period ended and one pilot decided not to sustain following completion of the full pilot. Factors influencing sustainability included: (1) program adaptability and flexibility; (2) funding structure and reimbursement requirements; (3) shared leadership with managed care plans; and (4) whether pilots chose to build out program infrastructure internally or contracted out core components to partner organizations. Many pilots, particularly those in rural areas, indicated that system and policy changes introduced as part of transitioning pilot services into Medicaid benefits reduced the sustainability of WPC for participating providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multi-level factors including program adaptability, funding, leadership, and capacity to build out infrastructure influenced the sustainability of WPC pilots. These findings have significant implications for health equity as equitable distribution of services, resources, and benefits from these programs can be supported through sustained implementation over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14418\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估影响加州新开发的医疗补助福利中为医疗补助参保者提供医疗和社会服务的 26 个社会关怀试点项目可持续性的多层次因素:评估影响 26 个社会护理试点可持续性的多层次因素,这些试点在新开发的医疗补助福利中为加州的医疗补助参保者整合了医疗和社会服务:本定性研究评估了 2016 年至 2021 年间实施的全人护理 (WPC) 试点项目的可持续性。试点项目(n = 26)代表了加利福尼亚州的大多数县:主要定性数据收集于 2021 年 6 月至 8 月间,包括 58 个小时的半结构化个人和小组访谈,访谈对象包括行政人员、中层管理人员和一线个案管理人员,他们代表了所有 WPC 试点项目。我们采用归纳-演绎混合主题分析法来识别和分析影响持续性因素的模式和异常值。演绎代码包括影响新项目可持续性的既定实施科学因素(如创新特征、能力、流程和互动以及背景):在 26 个 WPC 试点项目中,有 22 个试点项目通过与医疗补助管理性护理计划签订合同,将提供服务作为新开发的医疗补助福利的一部分,从而保持了 WPC 的持续性。3 个试点在试点期结束前选择不再继续,1 个试点在完成全部试点后决定不再继续。影响持续性的因素包括(1) 项目的适应性和灵活性;(2) 资金结构和报销要求;(3) 与管理性医疗计划的共同领导;(4) 试点项目是选择在内部建立项目基础设施,还是将核心部分外包给合作组织。许多试点项目,尤其是农村地区的试点项目表示,在将试点服务过渡到医疗补助福利的过程中引入的系统和政策变化,降低了 WPC 对参与服务提供者的可持续性:结论:包括计划适应性、资金、领导力和基础设施建设能力在内的多层次因素影响了 WPC 试点的可持续性。这些发现对健康公平具有重要意义,因为通过长期持续实施这些计划,可以支持服务、资源和福利的公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability of California's Whole Person Care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees via newly developed Medicaid benefits.

Objective: To assess multi-level factors influencing the sustainability of 26 social care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees across California in newly developed Medicaid benefits.

Study setting and design: This qualitative study assessed the sustainability of Whole Person Care (WPC) pilots implemented between 2016 and 2021. Pilots (n = 26) represented a majority of counties in California.

Data sources and analytic sample: Primary qualitative data were collected between June and August 2021 and included 58 hour-long, semi-structured individual and group interviews with administrators, middle managers, and frontline case management staff representing all WPC pilots. We used hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis to identify and analyze patterns, and outliers, in factors influencing sustainment. Deductive codes included established implementation science factors influencing the sustainability of new programs (e.g., innovation characteristics, capacity, processes and interactions, and context).

Principal findings: Of 26 WPC pilots, 22 pilots sustained WPC by contracting with Medicaid managed care plans to provide services as part of newly developed Medicaid benefits. Three pilots chose not to sustain before the pilot period ended and one pilot decided not to sustain following completion of the full pilot. Factors influencing sustainability included: (1) program adaptability and flexibility; (2) funding structure and reimbursement requirements; (3) shared leadership with managed care plans; and (4) whether pilots chose to build out program infrastructure internally or contracted out core components to partner organizations. Many pilots, particularly those in rural areas, indicated that system and policy changes introduced as part of transitioning pilot services into Medicaid benefits reduced the sustainability of WPC for participating providers.

Conclusions: Multi-level factors including program adaptability, funding, leadership, and capacity to build out infrastructure influenced the sustainability of WPC pilots. These findings have significant implications for health equity as equitable distribution of services, resources, and benefits from these programs can be supported through sustained implementation over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信