Rebecca Lucas, Emma Tapp, Rumbi Chimwayange, Luiza Hermoso, Matthew R Blakiston
{"title":"实验室开发的咽拭子中 A 群链球菌免提取实时 PCR:检测能力更强,结果更快。","authors":"Rebecca Lucas, Emma Tapp, Rumbi Chimwayange, Luiza Hermoso, Matthew R Blakiston","doi":"10.26635/6965.6676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This work describes the validation of an in-house extraction free real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) in throat swabs collected in gel amies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Throat swabs received by the laboratory were prospectively tested by routine bacterial culture and an in-house PCR assay targeting the GAS SpeB gene with a multiplexed RNaseP internal control. Samples with discrepant culture/PCR results had additional testing using the commercial Xpert Group A Strep PCR assay (Cepheid). Post introduction of the in-house GAS PCR the comparative laboratory turn-around time between PCR and historic culture results was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,093 throat swabs included in the final analysis, GAS was detected by culture and GAS PCR in 262 (24.0%) and 319 (29.2%) respectively. The overall, positive and negative agreement of the GAS PCR with culture was 94.2%, 98.9% and 92.8% respectively. Of the 63 discordant samples, one (33.3%) of three culture positive/in-house PCR negative samples and 56 (93.3%) of 60 culture negative/in-house PCR positive samples were GAS positive on the Xpert Group A Strep assay. Median turn-around time from laboratory receipt to result decreased from 44 to 16 hours with the introduction of the GAS PCR into routine practice. Forty-five percent of samples came from European patients and 25% from persons aged over 30 years, suggesting over-testing in persons at low risk of GAS pharyngitis complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-house GAS PCR provided greater and faster detection of GAS from throat swabs compared to culture. However, throat swabbing for GAS needs to be better targeted to those populations at high risk of post-GAS pharyngitis complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1607","pages":"34-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A laboratory-developed extraction free real-time PCR for Group A Streptococcus in throat swabs: greater detection and faster results.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Lucas, Emma Tapp, Rumbi Chimwayange, Luiza Hermoso, Matthew R Blakiston\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This work describes the validation of an in-house extraction free real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) in throat swabs collected in gel amies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Throat swabs received by the laboratory were prospectively tested by routine bacterial culture and an in-house PCR assay targeting the GAS SpeB gene with a multiplexed RNaseP internal control. Samples with discrepant culture/PCR results had additional testing using the commercial Xpert Group A Strep PCR assay (Cepheid). Post introduction of the in-house GAS PCR the comparative laboratory turn-around time between PCR and historic culture results was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,093 throat swabs included in the final analysis, GAS was detected by culture and GAS PCR in 262 (24.0%) and 319 (29.2%) respectively. The overall, positive and negative agreement of the GAS PCR with culture was 94.2%, 98.9% and 92.8% respectively. Of the 63 discordant samples, one (33.3%) of three culture positive/in-house PCR negative samples and 56 (93.3%) of 60 culture negative/in-house PCR positive samples were GAS positive on the Xpert Group A Strep assay. Median turn-around time from laboratory receipt to result decreased from 44 to 16 hours with the introduction of the GAS PCR into routine practice. Forty-five percent of samples came from European patients and 25% from persons aged over 30 years, suggesting over-testing in persons at low risk of GAS pharyngitis complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-house GAS PCR provided greater and faster detection of GAS from throat swabs compared to culture. However, throat swabbing for GAS needs to be better targeted to those populations at high risk of post-GAS pharyngitis complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"137 1607\",\"pages\":\"34-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究介绍了一种内部免提取实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法的验证情况,该方法可用于检测凝胶肛门采集的咽拭子中的 A 群链球菌(GAS):方法:实验室通过常规细菌培养和针对 GAS SpeB 基因的内部 PCR 分析以及多重 RNaseP 内部对照对收到的咽拭子进行前瞻性检测。对于培养/PCR 结果不一致的样本,则使用商用 Xpert A 组链球菌 PCR 检测法(Cepheid)进行补充检测。在引入内部 GAS PCR 后,确定了 PCR 和历史培养结果之间的实验室周转时间比较:结果:在最终分析的 1,093 份咽拭子中,分别有 262 份(24.0%)和 319 份(29.2%)通过培养和 GAS PCR 检测出 GAS。GAS PCR 与培养的总体、阳性和阴性一致率分别为 94.2%、98.9% 和 92.8%。在 63 份不一致的样本中,3 份培养阳性/室内 PCR 阴性样本中有 1 份(33.3%)和 60 份培养阴性/室内 PCR 阳性样本中有 56 份(93.3%)在 Xpert A 组链球菌检测中呈 GAS 阳性。随着 GAS PCR 被引入到常规实践中,从实验室接收到结果的中位周转时间从 44 小时缩短到 16 小时。45%的样本来自欧洲病人,25%的样本来自30岁以上的人群,这表明对GAS咽炎并发症风险较低的人群进行了过度检测:结论:与培养相比,内部 GAS PCR 能更快更准确地从咽拭子中检测出 GAS。然而,咽拭子检测 GAS 需要更好地针对 GAS 后咽炎并发症的高风险人群。
A laboratory-developed extraction free real-time PCR for Group A Streptococcus in throat swabs: greater detection and faster results.
Aim: This work describes the validation of an in-house extraction free real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) in throat swabs collected in gel amies.
Method: Throat swabs received by the laboratory were prospectively tested by routine bacterial culture and an in-house PCR assay targeting the GAS SpeB gene with a multiplexed RNaseP internal control. Samples with discrepant culture/PCR results had additional testing using the commercial Xpert Group A Strep PCR assay (Cepheid). Post introduction of the in-house GAS PCR the comparative laboratory turn-around time between PCR and historic culture results was determined.
Results: Of the 1,093 throat swabs included in the final analysis, GAS was detected by culture and GAS PCR in 262 (24.0%) and 319 (29.2%) respectively. The overall, positive and negative agreement of the GAS PCR with culture was 94.2%, 98.9% and 92.8% respectively. Of the 63 discordant samples, one (33.3%) of three culture positive/in-house PCR negative samples and 56 (93.3%) of 60 culture negative/in-house PCR positive samples were GAS positive on the Xpert Group A Strep assay. Median turn-around time from laboratory receipt to result decreased from 44 to 16 hours with the introduction of the GAS PCR into routine practice. Forty-five percent of samples came from European patients and 25% from persons aged over 30 years, suggesting over-testing in persons at low risk of GAS pharyngitis complications.
Conclusion: The in-house GAS PCR provided greater and faster detection of GAS from throat swabs compared to culture. However, throat swabbing for GAS needs to be better targeted to those populations at high risk of post-GAS pharyngitis complications.