创伤患者早期限制性与自由氧:TRAUMOX2随机临床试验

Q1 Medicine
Tobias Arleth, Josefine Baekgaard, Volkert Siersma, Andreas Creutzburg, Felicia Dinesen, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Johan Heiberg, Dan Isbye, Søren Mikkelsen, Peter M Hansen, Stine T Zwisler, Søren Darling, Louise B Petersen, Maria C R Mørkeberg, Mikkel Andersen, Christian Fenger-Eriksen, Peder T Bach, Mark G Van Vledder, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Niki A Ottenhof, Iscander M Maissan, Dennis Den Hartog, Wolf E Hautz, Dominik A Jakob, Manuela Iten, Matthias Haenggi, Roland Albrecht, Jochen Hinkelbein, Markus Klimek, Lars S Rasmussen, Jacob Steinmetz
{"title":"创伤患者早期限制性与自由氧:TRAUMOX2随机临床试验","authors":"Tobias Arleth, Josefine Baekgaard, Volkert Siersma, Andreas Creutzburg, Felicia Dinesen, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Johan Heiberg, Dan Isbye, Søren Mikkelsen, Peter M Hansen, Stine T Zwisler, Søren Darling, Louise B Petersen, Maria C R Mørkeberg, Mikkel Andersen, Christian Fenger-Eriksen, Peder T Bach, Mark G Van Vledder, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Niki A Ottenhof, Iscander M Maissan, Dennis Den Hartog, Wolf E Hautz, Dominik A Jakob, Manuela Iten, Matthias Haenggi, Roland Albrecht, Jochen Hinkelbein, Markus Klimek, Lars S Rasmussen, Jacob Steinmetz","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.25786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Early administration of supplemental oxygen for all severely injured trauma patients is recommended, but liberal oxygen treatment has been associated with increased risk of death and respiratory complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether an early 8-hour restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy in adult trauma patients would reduce death and/or major respiratory complications.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult trauma patients transferred directly to hospitals, triggering a full trauma team activation with an anticipated hospital stay of a minimum of 24 hours from December 7, 2021, to September 12, 2023. This multicenter trial was conducted at 15 prehospital bases and 5 major trauma centers in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. The 30-day follow-up period ended on October 12, 2023. The primary outcome was assessed by medical specialists in anesthesia and intensive care medicine blinded to the randomization.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>In the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a restrictive oxygen strategy (arterial oxygen saturation target of 94%) (n = 733) or liberal oxygen strategy (12-15 L of oxygen per minute or fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.6-1.0) (n = 724) for 8 hours.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days. The 2 key secondary outcomes, death and major respiratory complications within 30 days, were assessed individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1979 randomized patients, 1508 completed the trial (median [IQR] age, 50 [31-65] years; 73% male; and median Injury Severity Score was 14 [9-22]). Death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days occurred in 118 of 733 patients (16.1%) in the restrictive oxygen group and 121 of 724 patients (16.7%) in the liberal oxygen group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.37]; P = .94; absolute difference, 0.56 percentage points [95% CI, -2.70 to 3.82]). No significant differences were found between groups for each component of the composite outcome. Adverse and serious adverse events were similar across groups, with the exception of atelectasis, which was less common in the restrictive oxygen group compared with the liberal oxygen group (27.6% vs 34.7%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In adult trauma patients, an early restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy initiated in the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission for 8 hours did not significantly reduce death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05146700.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"479-489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Restrictive vs Liberal Oxygen for Trauma Patients: The TRAUMOX2 Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Arleth, Josefine Baekgaard, Volkert Siersma, Andreas Creutzburg, Felicia Dinesen, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Johan Heiberg, Dan Isbye, Søren Mikkelsen, Peter M Hansen, Stine T Zwisler, Søren Darling, Louise B Petersen, Maria C R Mørkeberg, Mikkel Andersen, Christian Fenger-Eriksen, Peder T Bach, Mark G Van Vledder, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Niki A Ottenhof, Iscander M Maissan, Dennis Den Hartog, Wolf E Hautz, Dominik A Jakob, Manuela Iten, Matthias Haenggi, Roland Albrecht, Jochen Hinkelbein, Markus Klimek, Lars S Rasmussen, Jacob Steinmetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jama.2024.25786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Early administration of supplemental oxygen for all severely injured trauma patients is recommended, but liberal oxygen treatment has been associated with increased risk of death and respiratory complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether an early 8-hour restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy in adult trauma patients would reduce death and/or major respiratory complications.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult trauma patients transferred directly to hospitals, triggering a full trauma team activation with an anticipated hospital stay of a minimum of 24 hours from December 7, 2021, to September 12, 2023. This multicenter trial was conducted at 15 prehospital bases and 5 major trauma centers in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. The 30-day follow-up period ended on October 12, 2023. The primary outcome was assessed by medical specialists in anesthesia and intensive care medicine blinded to the randomization.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>In the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a restrictive oxygen strategy (arterial oxygen saturation target of 94%) (n = 733) or liberal oxygen strategy (12-15 L of oxygen per minute or fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.6-1.0) (n = 724) for 8 hours.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days. The 2 key secondary outcomes, death and major respiratory complications within 30 days, were assessed individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1979 randomized patients, 1508 completed the trial (median [IQR] age, 50 [31-65] years; 73% male; and median Injury Severity Score was 14 [9-22]). Death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days occurred in 118 of 733 patients (16.1%) in the restrictive oxygen group and 121 of 724 patients (16.7%) in the liberal oxygen group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.37]; P = .94; absolute difference, 0.56 percentage points [95% CI, -2.70 to 3.82]). No significant differences were found between groups for each component of the composite outcome. Adverse and serious adverse events were similar across groups, with the exception of atelectasis, which was less common in the restrictive oxygen group compared with the liberal oxygen group (27.6% vs 34.7%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In adult trauma patients, an early restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy initiated in the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission for 8 hours did not significantly reduce death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05146700.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"479-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.25786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.25786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:建议所有严重创伤患者早期给予补充氧,但自由氧治疗与死亡和呼吸系统并发症的风险增加有关。目的:确定与自由氧策略相比,成人创伤患者早期8小时限制氧策略是否会减少死亡和/或主要呼吸系统并发症。设计、环境和参与者:该随机对照试验招募了直接转到医院的成人创伤患者,触发了一个完整的创伤小组的激活,预计住院时间从2021年12月7日到2023年9月12日至少为24小时。这项多中心试验在丹麦、荷兰和瑞士的15个院前基地和5个主要创伤中心进行。为期30天的随访期于2023年10月12日结束。主要结果由麻醉和重症监护医学专家对随机分组进行盲法评估。干预措施:在院前环境或创伤中心入院时,患者随机按1:1分配到限制性氧策略(动脉氧饱和度目标为94%)(n = 733)或自由氧策略(12- 15l /分钟或吸入氧分数为0.6-1.0)(n = 724),持续8小时。主要结局和措施:主要结局是30天内死亡和/或主要呼吸系统并发症的综合结果。分别评估30天内死亡和主要呼吸系统并发症这两个关键次要结局。结果:1979例随机患者中,1508例完成试验(中位[IQR]年龄为50[31-65]岁;男性73%;损伤严重程度评分中位数为14[9-22])。限制氧组733例患者中有118例(16.1%)在30天内死亡和/或主要呼吸系统并发症,自由氧组724例患者中有121例(16.7%)(优势比1.01 [95% CI, 0.75 ~ 1.37];p = .94;绝对差异,0.56个百分点[95% CI, -2.70至3.82])。综合结果的各个组成部分在组间没有发现显著差异。不良和严重不良事件在两组之间相似,除了肺不张,限制氧组比自由氧组更少见(分别为27.6%和34.7%)。结论和相关性:在成人创伤患者中,与院前或入院时8小时开始的自由氧策略相比,早期限制氧策略在30天内并没有显著减少死亡和/或主要呼吸系统并发症。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05146700。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Restrictive vs Liberal Oxygen for Trauma Patients: The TRAUMOX2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Early administration of supplemental oxygen for all severely injured trauma patients is recommended, but liberal oxygen treatment has been associated with increased risk of death and respiratory complications.

Objective: To determine whether an early 8-hour restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy in adult trauma patients would reduce death and/or major respiratory complications.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult trauma patients transferred directly to hospitals, triggering a full trauma team activation with an anticipated hospital stay of a minimum of 24 hours from December 7, 2021, to September 12, 2023. This multicenter trial was conducted at 15 prehospital bases and 5 major trauma centers in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. The 30-day follow-up period ended on October 12, 2023. The primary outcome was assessed by medical specialists in anesthesia and intensive care medicine blinded to the randomization.

Interventions: In the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a restrictive oxygen strategy (arterial oxygen saturation target of 94%) (n = 733) or liberal oxygen strategy (12-15 L of oxygen per minute or fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.6-1.0) (n = 724) for 8 hours.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days. The 2 key secondary outcomes, death and major respiratory complications within 30 days, were assessed individually.

Results: Among 1979 randomized patients, 1508 completed the trial (median [IQR] age, 50 [31-65] years; 73% male; and median Injury Severity Score was 14 [9-22]). Death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days occurred in 118 of 733 patients (16.1%) in the restrictive oxygen group and 121 of 724 patients (16.7%) in the liberal oxygen group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.37]; P = .94; absolute difference, 0.56 percentage points [95% CI, -2.70 to 3.82]). No significant differences were found between groups for each component of the composite outcome. Adverse and serious adverse events were similar across groups, with the exception of atelectasis, which was less common in the restrictive oxygen group compared with the liberal oxygen group (27.6% vs 34.7%, respectively).

Conclusions and relevance: In adult trauma patients, an early restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy initiated in the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission for 8 hours did not significantly reduce death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05146700.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA, published continuously since 1883, is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信