奥拉帕尼作为铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者的治疗与非铂化疗:III期SOLO3研究的最终总生存结果

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-20 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00933
Giovanni Scambia, Ricardo Villalobos Valencia, Nicoletta Colombo, David Cibula, Charles A Leath, Mariusz Bidziński, Jae-Weon Kim, Joo Hyun Nam, Radoslaw Madry, Carlos Hernández, Paulo A R Mora, Sang Young Ryu, Mei-Lin Ah-See, Elizabeth S Lowe, Natalia Lukashchuk, Dave Carter, Richard T Penson
{"title":"奥拉帕尼作为铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者的治疗与非铂化疗:III期SOLO3研究的最终总生存结果","authors":"Giovanni Scambia, Ricardo Villalobos Valencia, Nicoletta Colombo, David Cibula, Charles A Leath, Mariusz Bidziński, Jae-Weon Kim, Joo Hyun Nam, Radoslaw Madry, Carlos Hernández, Paulo A R Mora, Sang Young Ryu, Mei-Lin Ah-See, Elizabeth S Lowe, Natalia Lukashchuk, Dave Carter, Richard T Penson","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olaparib treatment significantly improved objective response rate (primary end point) and progression-free survival versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the open-label phase III SOLO3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02282020). We report final overall survival (OS; prespecified secondary end point), post hoc OS analysis by number of previous chemotherapy lines, and exploratory BRCA reversion mutation analysis. Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily; n = 178) or physician's choice of single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan; n = 88). OS was similar with olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.49]; <i>P</i> = .71, median 34.9 and 32.9 months, respectively, full analysis set). OS with olaparib was favorable in patients with two previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 0.83 [olaparib <i>v</i> chemotherapy] [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.38]; median 37.9 <i>v</i> 28.8 months); however, a potential detrimental effect was seen in patients with at least three previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84 to 2.18]; median 29.9 <i>v</i> 39.4 months). BRCA reversion mutations might have contributed to this finding. No patient randomly assigned to olaparib with a BRCA reversion mutation detected at baseline (6 of 170 [3.5%]) achieved an objective tumor response.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1408-1416"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Olaparib as Treatment Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: Phase III SOLO3 Study Final Overall Survival Results.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Scambia, Ricardo Villalobos Valencia, Nicoletta Colombo, David Cibula, Charles A Leath, Mariusz Bidziński, Jae-Weon Kim, Joo Hyun Nam, Radoslaw Madry, Carlos Hernández, Paulo A R Mora, Sang Young Ryu, Mei-Lin Ah-See, Elizabeth S Lowe, Natalia Lukashchuk, Dave Carter, Richard T Penson\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.24.00933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Olaparib treatment significantly improved objective response rate (primary end point) and progression-free survival versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the open-label phase III SOLO3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02282020). We report final overall survival (OS; prespecified secondary end point), post hoc OS analysis by number of previous chemotherapy lines, and exploratory BRCA reversion mutation analysis. Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily; n = 178) or physician's choice of single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan; n = 88). OS was similar with olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.49]; <i>P</i> = .71, median 34.9 and 32.9 months, respectively, full analysis set). OS with olaparib was favorable in patients with two previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 0.83 [olaparib <i>v</i> chemotherapy] [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.38]; median 37.9 <i>v</i> 28.8 months); however, a potential detrimental effect was seen in patients with at least three previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84 to 2.18]; median 29.9 <i>v</i> 39.4 months). BRCA reversion mutations might have contributed to this finding. No patient randomly assigned to olaparib with a BRCA reversion mutation detected at baseline (6 of 170 [3.5%]) achieved an objective tumor response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1408-1416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00933\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在开放标签III期SOLO3试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识号:NCT02282020)中,与非铂类化疗相比,奥拉帕尼治疗显著提高了brca突变的铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者的客观缓解率(主要终点)和无进展生存期。我们报告最终总生存期(OS);预先指定的次要终点),通过先前化疗线的数量进行事后OS分析,以及探索性BRCA逆转突变分析。266例患者随机按2:1分配奥拉帕尼片(300 mg,每日2次;N = 178)或医生选择的单药非铂类化疗(聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素、紫杉醇、吉西他滨或拓扑替康;N = 88)。奥拉帕尼与化疗的OS相似(风险比[HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 ~ 1.49];P = 0.71,中位数分别为34.9个月和32.9个月(全分析集)。奥拉帕尼对既往两种化疗系患者的OS有利(HR, 0.83[奥拉帕尼vs化疗][95% CI, 0.51至1.38];中位37.9 v 28.8个月);然而,在至少接受过三条化疗线的患者中发现了潜在的有害影响(HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84至2.18];中位29.9 v 39.4个月)。BRCA逆转突变可能促成了这一发现。在基线检测到BRCA逆转突变的患者中,没有随机分配到奥拉帕尼的患者(170例中有6例[3.5%])获得客观的肿瘤反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Olaparib as Treatment Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: Phase III SOLO3 Study Final Overall Survival Results.

Olaparib treatment significantly improved objective response rate (primary end point) and progression-free survival versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the open-label phase III SOLO3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02282020). We report final overall survival (OS; prespecified secondary end point), post hoc OS analysis by number of previous chemotherapy lines, and exploratory BRCA reversion mutation analysis. Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily; n = 178) or physician's choice of single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan; n = 88). OS was similar with olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.49]; P = .71, median 34.9 and 32.9 months, respectively, full analysis set). OS with olaparib was favorable in patients with two previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 0.83 [olaparib v chemotherapy] [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.38]; median 37.9 v 28.8 months); however, a potential detrimental effect was seen in patients with at least three previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84 to 2.18]; median 29.9 v 39.4 months). BRCA reversion mutations might have contributed to this finding. No patient randomly assigned to olaparib with a BRCA reversion mutation detected at baseline (6 of 170 [3.5%]) achieved an objective tumor response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信