{"title":"日本心力衰竭患者使用可穿戴式心律转复除颤器期间和之后的临床疗效:单中心经验","authors":"Noriko Kikuchi MD, Tsuyoshi Shiga MD, Yohei Sugawara MD, Atsushi Suzuki MD, Yoshiaki Minami MD, Hidetoshi Hattori MD, Morio Shoda MD, Nobuhisa Hagiwara MD, Junichi Yamaguchi MD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is indicated for a limited period in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Nonischemic heart failure (HF) is common among Japanese patients with HF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of fatal arrhythmias during WCD use and the clinical outcomes after WCD withdrawal in Japanese patients with HF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively studied 105 hospitalized HF patients who were discharged with a WCD. The main outcome was SCD/ventricular arrhythmias during WCD use and the other outcomes were implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), SCD/ventricular arrhythmias after WCD withdrawal, and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-seven (83%) patients received a WCD for primary prevention of SCD, of whom 60 (69%) were new-onset HF patients with an LVEF ≤35%. The median daily wear time was 22.1 h. Two patients experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia and one patient experienced atrioventricular block with asystole while on WCD. After WCD withdrawal, 81 (77%) patients decided not to receive ICD implantation. The percentage of patients with an LVEF ≥35% increased from 20% at baseline to 70% at 1 year after discharge. During the median follow-up of 50 months, 78 (96%) of the 81 patients who did not have an ICD were free of SCD/ventricular arrhythmias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of a WCD is useful for determining the appropriate indication for ICD implantation in Japanese patients with new-onset HF, a low LVEF, and a risk of SCD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 6","pages":"1462-1472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes during and after wearable cardioverter defibrillator use in Japanese patients with heart failure: A single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"Noriko Kikuchi MD, Tsuyoshi Shiga MD, Yohei Sugawara MD, Atsushi Suzuki MD, Yoshiaki Minami MD, Hidetoshi Hattori MD, Morio Shoda MD, Nobuhisa Hagiwara MD, Junichi Yamaguchi MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.13158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is indicated for a limited period in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Nonischemic heart failure (HF) is common among Japanese patients with HF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of fatal arrhythmias during WCD use and the clinical outcomes after WCD withdrawal in Japanese patients with HF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively studied 105 hospitalized HF patients who were discharged with a WCD. The main outcome was SCD/ventricular arrhythmias during WCD use and the other outcomes were implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), SCD/ventricular arrhythmias after WCD withdrawal, and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-seven (83%) patients received a WCD for primary prevention of SCD, of whom 60 (69%) were new-onset HF patients with an LVEF ≤35%. The median daily wear time was 22.1 h. Two patients experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia and one patient experienced atrioventricular block with asystole while on WCD. After WCD withdrawal, 81 (77%) patients decided not to receive ICD implantation. The percentage of patients with an LVEF ≥35% increased from 20% at baseline to 70% at 1 year after discharge. During the median follow-up of 50 months, 78 (96%) of the 81 patients who did not have an ICD were free of SCD/ventricular arrhythmias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of a WCD is useful for determining the appropriate indication for ICD implantation in Japanese patients with new-onset HF, a low LVEF, and a risk of SCD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"1462-1472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632265/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical outcomes during and after wearable cardioverter defibrillator use in Japanese patients with heart failure: A single-center experience
Background
A wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is indicated for a limited period in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Nonischemic heart failure (HF) is common among Japanese patients with HF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of fatal arrhythmias during WCD use and the clinical outcomes after WCD withdrawal in Japanese patients with HF.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 105 hospitalized HF patients who were discharged with a WCD. The main outcome was SCD/ventricular arrhythmias during WCD use and the other outcomes were implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), SCD/ventricular arrhythmias after WCD withdrawal, and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Results
Eighty-seven (83%) patients received a WCD for primary prevention of SCD, of whom 60 (69%) were new-onset HF patients with an LVEF ≤35%. The median daily wear time was 22.1 h. Two patients experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia and one patient experienced atrioventricular block with asystole while on WCD. After WCD withdrawal, 81 (77%) patients decided not to receive ICD implantation. The percentage of patients with an LVEF ≥35% increased from 20% at baseline to 70% at 1 year after discharge. During the median follow-up of 50 months, 78 (96%) of the 81 patients who did not have an ICD were free of SCD/ventricular arrhythmias.
Conclusions
The use of a WCD is useful for determining the appropriate indication for ICD implantation in Japanese patients with new-onset HF, a low LVEF, and a risk of SCD.