{"title":"探讨电解剖定位在单次脉冲场导管消融中的作用。","authors":"Ourania Kariki MD, Panagiotis Mililis MD, Athanasios Saplaouras MD, Theodoros Efremidis MD, Anastasios Chatziantoniou MD, Ioannis Panagiotopoulos MD, Stylianos Dragasis MD, Konstantinos P. Letsas MD, PhD, FEHRA, Michael Efremidis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a form of nonthermal energy that has been recently introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A multi-electrode pentaspline catheter for delivery of PFA guided by fluoroscopy has become widely available for clinical use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we aimed to assess whether the addition of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for confirmation of PVI in the acute phase can increase the efficacy of the procedure in terms of arrhythmia recurrences. A total of 51 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for first time PVI were included in the study. Participants were assigned to receive PVI using fluoroscopy guidance only (Fluoro-only group: 31 patients) or additional validation with EAM (EAM group: 20 patients). Endpoints included arrhythmia recurrence and procedural characteristics. During a 11.2 ± 1.3 months follow-up period, arrhythmia recurrences did not statistically differ between groups (16.1% vs. 20%, <i>p</i> .72). Procedure time was longer in the EAM group (86.5 ± 11.4 vs. 78.4 ± 9.3 min, <i>p</i> .008). EAM revealed 5 nonisolated PVs that were re-ablated using the same catheter. Four patients of the cohort underwent a redo-procedure during the follow-up period. In all 4 cases, at least one reconnected PV was identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In a cohort of patients with AF undergoing first time PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter, PVI validation with EAM did not lead to significantly different arrhythmia recurrence rates compared to PVI without EAM. In the acute phase, the rate of nonisolated PVs was low.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 6","pages":"1374-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the role of electroanatomical mapping in single-shot pulsed field catheter ablation\",\"authors\":\"Ourania Kariki MD, Panagiotis Mililis MD, Athanasios Saplaouras MD, Theodoros Efremidis MD, Anastasios Chatziantoniou MD, Ioannis Panagiotopoulos MD, Stylianos Dragasis MD, Konstantinos P. Letsas MD, PhD, FEHRA, Michael Efremidis MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.13180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a form of nonthermal energy that has been recently introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A multi-electrode pentaspline catheter for delivery of PFA guided by fluoroscopy has become widely available for clinical use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, we aimed to assess whether the addition of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for confirmation of PVI in the acute phase can increase the efficacy of the procedure in terms of arrhythmia recurrences. A total of 51 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for first time PVI were included in the study. Participants were assigned to receive PVI using fluoroscopy guidance only (Fluoro-only group: 31 patients) or additional validation with EAM (EAM group: 20 patients). Endpoints included arrhythmia recurrence and procedural characteristics. During a 11.2 ± 1.3 months follow-up period, arrhythmia recurrences did not statistically differ between groups (16.1% vs. 20%, <i>p</i> .72). Procedure time was longer in the EAM group (86.5 ± 11.4 vs. 78.4 ± 9.3 min, <i>p</i> .008). EAM revealed 5 nonisolated PVs that were re-ablated using the same catheter. Four patients of the cohort underwent a redo-procedure during the follow-up period. In all 4 cases, at least one reconnected PV was identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a cohort of patients with AF undergoing first time PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter, PVI validation with EAM did not lead to significantly different arrhythmia recurrence rates compared to PVI without EAM. In the acute phase, the rate of nonisolated PVs was low.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"1374-1378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632236/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种最近被引入肺静脉隔离(PVI)的非热能形式。一种多电极pentaspline导管在透视引导下输送PFA已广泛应用于临床。方法和结果:在本研究中,我们旨在评估在急性期增加电解剖定位(EAM)来确认PVI是否可以提高心律失常复发的疗效。研究共纳入51例首次行PVI的心房颤动(AF)患者。参与者被分配到仅在透视指导下接受PVI(仅氟组:31例患者)或额外的EAM验证(EAM组:20例患者)。终点包括心律失常复发和手术特征。在11.2±1.3个月的随访期间,两组患者心律失常复发率无统计学差异(16.1% vs. 20%, p .72)。EAM组手术时间更长(86.5±11.4 min vs. 78.4±9.3 min, p .008)。EAM发现5例未分离的pv使用同一导管再次消融。该队列中的4例患者在随访期间接受了再手术。在所有4例中,至少发现了一个重新连接的PV。结论:在一组使用pentaspline PFA导管进行首次PVI的房颤患者中,与不使用EAM的PVI相比,EAM的PVI验证并没有导致心律失常复发率的显著差异。急性期非分离性pv发生率低。
Investigating the role of electroanatomical mapping in single-shot pulsed field catheter ablation
Introduction
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a form of nonthermal energy that has been recently introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A multi-electrode pentaspline catheter for delivery of PFA guided by fluoroscopy has become widely available for clinical use.
Methods and Results
In this study, we aimed to assess whether the addition of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for confirmation of PVI in the acute phase can increase the efficacy of the procedure in terms of arrhythmia recurrences. A total of 51 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for first time PVI were included in the study. Participants were assigned to receive PVI using fluoroscopy guidance only (Fluoro-only group: 31 patients) or additional validation with EAM (EAM group: 20 patients). Endpoints included arrhythmia recurrence and procedural characteristics. During a 11.2 ± 1.3 months follow-up period, arrhythmia recurrences did not statistically differ between groups (16.1% vs. 20%, p .72). Procedure time was longer in the EAM group (86.5 ± 11.4 vs. 78.4 ± 9.3 min, p .008). EAM revealed 5 nonisolated PVs that were re-ablated using the same catheter. Four patients of the cohort underwent a redo-procedure during the follow-up period. In all 4 cases, at least one reconnected PV was identified.
Conclusion
In a cohort of patients with AF undergoing first time PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter, PVI validation with EAM did not lead to significantly different arrhythmia recurrence rates compared to PVI without EAM. In the acute phase, the rate of nonisolated PVs was low.