免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性肾癌的细胞减少性肾切除术:个体患者数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Dimitrios Makrakis, Pavlos Msaouel, Jose A Karam, Stepan Μ Esagian
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性肾癌的细胞减少性肾切除术:个体患者数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Dimitrios Makrakis, Pavlos Msaouel, Jose A Karam, Stepan Μ Esagian","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the survival benefit of CN in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases up to August 26, 2023 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS) for patients with mRCC treated with ICIs with or without CN. We reconstructed individual patient data using published Kaplan-Meier curves and performed one- and two-stage meta-analyses using 6-mo and 12-mo landmarks to control for immortal time bias. We also performed subgroup analyses for patients treated with first-line ICI or upfront CN.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We identified eight eligible studies involving a total of 2319 patients. There were statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, clear cell histology, International mRCC Database Consortium scores) between the ICI + CN and ICI-alone groups. Combined CN + ICI therapy was associated with superior OS in the primary analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.54) and secondary analyses, and in subgroup analyses for patients receiving first-line ICI therapy (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.48) and upfront CN (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CN combined with ICI therapy in mRCC may be associated with superior OS. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding and identify the patients most likely to benefit from CN in this setting.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We compared outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, which boosts the immune system to fight cancer, with or without nephrectomy (surgical removal of the kidney) in patients with metastatic kidney cancer. We found that the combination of nephrectomy and ICI therapy was associated with better survival than just ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios Makrakis, Pavlos Msaouel, Jose A Karam, Stepan Μ Esagian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the survival benefit of CN in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases up to August 26, 2023 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS) for patients with mRCC treated with ICIs with or without CN. We reconstructed individual patient data using published Kaplan-Meier curves and performed one- and two-stage meta-analyses using 6-mo and 12-mo landmarks to control for immortal time bias. We also performed subgroup analyses for patients treated with first-line ICI or upfront CN.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We identified eight eligible studies involving a total of 2319 patients. There were statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, clear cell histology, International mRCC Database Consortium scores) between the ICI + CN and ICI-alone groups. Combined CN + ICI therapy was associated with superior OS in the primary analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.54) and secondary analyses, and in subgroup analyses for patients receiving first-line ICI therapy (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.48) and upfront CN (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CN combined with ICI therapy in mRCC may be associated with superior OS. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding and identify the patients most likely to benefit from CN in this setting.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We compared outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, which boosts the immune system to fight cancer, with or without nephrectomy (surgical removal of the kidney) in patients with metastatic kidney cancer. We found that the combination of nephrectomy and ICI therapy was associated with better survival than just ICI therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)时代,细胞减原性肾切除术(CN)在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)中的作用存在争议。我们的目的是研究在接受ICIs治疗的mRCC患者中CN的生存获益。方法:我们检索了截至2023年8月26日的EMBASE、MEDLINE和Web of Science数据库,以确定比较有或无CN的ICIs治疗mRCC患者总生存期(OS)的研究。我们使用已发表的Kaplan-Meier曲线重建了个体患者数据,并使用6个月和12个月的里程碑进行了一阶段和两阶段荟萃分析,以控制不朽的时间偏差。我们还对一线ICI或前期CN治疗的患者进行了亚组分析。主要发现和局限性:我们确定了8项符合条件的研究,共涉及2319名患者。在ICI + CN组和ICI单独组之间,基线特征(年龄、透明细胞组织学、国际mRCC数据库联盟评分)存在统计学上的显著差异。在主要分析(风险比[HR] 0.45, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.37-0.54)和次要分析中,以及在接受一线ICI治疗的患者(HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.48)和前期CN (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69)的亚组分析中,CN + ICI联合治疗与较好的OS相关。结论和临床意义:CN联合ICI治疗mRCC可能与较好的OS相关。需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现,并确定在这种情况下最有可能从CN获益的患者。患者总结:我们比较了转移性肾癌患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗后的结果,该疗法可增强免疫系统对抗癌症,并伴有或不伴有肾切除术(手术切除肾脏)。我们发现联合肾切除术和ICI治疗比单纯的ICI治疗有更好的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data.

Background and objective: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the survival benefit of CN in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs.

Methods: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases up to August 26, 2023 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS) for patients with mRCC treated with ICIs with or without CN. We reconstructed individual patient data using published Kaplan-Meier curves and performed one- and two-stage meta-analyses using 6-mo and 12-mo landmarks to control for immortal time bias. We also performed subgroup analyses for patients treated with first-line ICI or upfront CN.

Key findings and limitations: We identified eight eligible studies involving a total of 2319 patients. There were statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, clear cell histology, International mRCC Database Consortium scores) between the ICI + CN and ICI-alone groups. Combined CN + ICI therapy was associated with superior OS in the primary analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.54) and secondary analyses, and in subgroup analyses for patients receiving first-line ICI therapy (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.48) and upfront CN (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69).

Conclusions and clinical implications: CN combined with ICI therapy in mRCC may be associated with superior OS. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding and identify the patients most likely to benefit from CN in this setting.

Patient summary: We compared outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, which boosts the immune system to fight cancer, with or without nephrectomy (surgical removal of the kidney) in patients with metastatic kidney cancer. We found that the combination of nephrectomy and ICI therapy was associated with better survival than just ICI therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信