Sara Lopes, Michela Servadio, Andrea Spini, Luca L'Abbate, Ylenia Ingrasciotta, Sabrina Giometto, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Olivia Leoni, Martina Zanforlini, Domenica Ancona, Paolo Stella, Aurora Puccini, Ester Sapigni, Paola Rossi, Lucian Ejlli, Francesco Balducci, Antea Maria Pia Mangano, Stefano Ledda, Paolo Carta, Rita Francesca Scarpelli, Giovambattista De Sarro, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Antonio Addis, Gianluca Trifirò, Valeria Belleudi
{"title":"妊娠前、妊娠期间和妊娠后生物药物使用轨迹:来自VALORE项目的意大利队列研究。","authors":"Sara Lopes, Michela Servadio, Andrea Spini, Luca L'Abbate, Ylenia Ingrasciotta, Sabrina Giometto, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Olivia Leoni, Martina Zanforlini, Domenica Ancona, Paolo Stella, Aurora Puccini, Ester Sapigni, Paola Rossi, Lucian Ejlli, Francesco Balducci, Antea Maria Pia Mangano, Stefano Ledda, Paolo Carta, Rita Francesca Scarpelli, Giovambattista De Sarro, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Antonio Addis, Gianluca Trifirò, Valeria Belleudi","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2442452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring biologic drug therapy during pregnancy in women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is crucial to ensure treatments align with evidence-based practices.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study based on healthcare claims data from eight Italian regions was conducted, analyzing deliveries between 2009 and 2021. The study included women receiving biologic drugs within nine months before their last menstruation. Exposures to biologics, conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and symptom-relieving medications were assessed in the trimesters (T) before, during and after pregnancy. Factors influencing biologic treatment persistence during pregnancy were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 1,763 deliveries was considered. Biologic drugs were prescribed for rheumatic (33.6%), dermatological (32.6%), and gastrointestinal diseases (28.4%). Biologic use declined during pregnancy (TI = 37.3%; TII = 17.6%; TIII = 11.3%), increasing again postpartum. During pregnancy, there was increased use of symptom-relieving medications for rheumatic diseases and DMARDs for gastrointestinal diseases. Factors associated with continued biologic treatment included being older than 35 years and the region of delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a decrease in biologics drug use during pregnancy and highlights the necessity for personalized therapeutic approaches. Geographic variations in biologic drug use emphasize the need for educational initiatives about the risk-benefit profiles of these therapies during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"119-131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectories of biologic drug use before, during and after pregnancy: an Italian cohort study from the VALORE project.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Lopes, Michela Servadio, Andrea Spini, Luca L'Abbate, Ylenia Ingrasciotta, Sabrina Giometto, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Olivia Leoni, Martina Zanforlini, Domenica Ancona, Paolo Stella, Aurora Puccini, Ester Sapigni, Paola Rossi, Lucian Ejlli, Francesco Balducci, Antea Maria Pia Mangano, Stefano Ledda, Paolo Carta, Rita Francesca Scarpelli, Giovambattista De Sarro, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Antonio Addis, Gianluca Trifirò, Valeria Belleudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2024.2442452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring biologic drug therapy during pregnancy in women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is crucial to ensure treatments align with evidence-based practices.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study based on healthcare claims data from eight Italian regions was conducted, analyzing deliveries between 2009 and 2021. The study included women receiving biologic drugs within nine months before their last menstruation. Exposures to biologics, conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and symptom-relieving medications were assessed in the trimesters (T) before, during and after pregnancy. Factors influencing biologic treatment persistence during pregnancy were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 1,763 deliveries was considered. Biologic drugs were prescribed for rheumatic (33.6%), dermatological (32.6%), and gastrointestinal diseases (28.4%). Biologic use declined during pregnancy (TI = 37.3%; TII = 17.6%; TIII = 11.3%), increasing again postpartum. During pregnancy, there was increased use of symptom-relieving medications for rheumatic diseases and DMARDs for gastrointestinal diseases. Factors associated with continued biologic treatment included being older than 35 years and the region of delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a decrease in biologics drug use during pregnancy and highlights the necessity for personalized therapeutic approaches. Geographic variations in biologic drug use emphasize the need for educational initiatives about the risk-benefit profiles of these therapies during pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2442452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2442452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trajectories of biologic drug use before, during and after pregnancy: an Italian cohort study from the VALORE project.
Background: Monitoring biologic drug therapy during pregnancy in women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is crucial to ensure treatments align with evidence-based practices.
Research design and methods: A retrospective cohort study based on healthcare claims data from eight Italian regions was conducted, analyzing deliveries between 2009 and 2021. The study included women receiving biologic drugs within nine months before their last menstruation. Exposures to biologics, conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and symptom-relieving medications were assessed in the trimesters (T) before, during and after pregnancy. Factors influencing biologic treatment persistence during pregnancy were analyzed.
Results: A cohort of 1,763 deliveries was considered. Biologic drugs were prescribed for rheumatic (33.6%), dermatological (32.6%), and gastrointestinal diseases (28.4%). Biologic use declined during pregnancy (TI = 37.3%; TII = 17.6%; TIII = 11.3%), increasing again postpartum. During pregnancy, there was increased use of symptom-relieving medications for rheumatic diseases and DMARDs for gastrointestinal diseases. Factors associated with continued biologic treatment included being older than 35 years and the region of delivery.
Conclusions: This study found a decrease in biologics drug use during pregnancy and highlights the necessity for personalized therapeutic approaches. Geographic variations in biologic drug use emphasize the need for educational initiatives about the risk-benefit profiles of these therapies during pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.