Nicholas Whitcomb;Anders Høst-Madsen;Zixiang Xiong;Jeffrey A. Weldon
{"title":"无线流媒体的突发与连续传输","authors":"Nicholas Whitcomb;Anders Høst-Madsen;Zixiang Xiong;Jeffrey A. Weldon","doi":"10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3516523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes energy consumption in wireless streaming with delay constraints. One fundamental question is whether the transmitter should transmit a steady stream of bits, continuous transmission, or transmit data in bursts and switch off while not transmitting. In the latter case, a question is also for what fraction of time the transmitter should transmit, the duty cycle. In this paper we use traditional and finite blocklength information theory to see whether bursty transmission would be better than transmitting data continuously. When doing this analysis we consider latency and energy efficiency, two fundamental parameters that characterize communication systems. We take into account realistic models of hardware, including overhead power, power amplifier inefficiency and the receiver noise factor. With these models we find that the energy consumption and latency tradeoff behaves quite differently from the ideal case.","PeriodicalId":13041,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Communications","volume":"73 7","pages":"4855-4867"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bursty Versus Continuous Transmission for Wireless Streaming\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Whitcomb;Anders Høst-Madsen;Zixiang Xiong;Jeffrey A. Weldon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3516523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes energy consumption in wireless streaming with delay constraints. One fundamental question is whether the transmitter should transmit a steady stream of bits, continuous transmission, or transmit data in bursts and switch off while not transmitting. In the latter case, a question is also for what fraction of time the transmitter should transmit, the duty cycle. In this paper we use traditional and finite blocklength information theory to see whether bursty transmission would be better than transmitting data continuously. When doing this analysis we consider latency and energy efficiency, two fundamental parameters that characterize communication systems. We take into account realistic models of hardware, including overhead power, power amplifier inefficiency and the receiver noise factor. With these models we find that the energy consumption and latency tradeoff behaves quite differently from the ideal case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Communications\",\"volume\":\"73 7\",\"pages\":\"4855-4867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10795199/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Communications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10795199/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bursty Versus Continuous Transmission for Wireless Streaming
This paper analyzes energy consumption in wireless streaming with delay constraints. One fundamental question is whether the transmitter should transmit a steady stream of bits, continuous transmission, or transmit data in bursts and switch off while not transmitting. In the latter case, a question is also for what fraction of time the transmitter should transmit, the duty cycle. In this paper we use traditional and finite blocklength information theory to see whether bursty transmission would be better than transmitting data continuously. When doing this analysis we consider latency and energy efficiency, two fundamental parameters that characterize communication systems. We take into account realistic models of hardware, including overhead power, power amplifier inefficiency and the receiver noise factor. With these models we find that the energy consumption and latency tradeoff behaves quite differently from the ideal case.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Communications is dedicated to publishing high-quality manuscripts that showcase advancements in the state-of-the-art of telecommunications. Our scope encompasses all aspects of telecommunications, including telephone, telegraphy, facsimile, and television, facilitated by electromagnetic propagation methods such as radio, wire, aerial, underground, coaxial, and submarine cables, as well as waveguides, communication satellites, and lasers. We cover telecommunications in various settings, including marine, aeronautical, space, and fixed station services, addressing topics such as repeaters, radio relaying, signal storage, regeneration, error detection and correction, multiplexing, carrier techniques, communication switching systems, data communications, and communication theory. Join us in advancing the field of telecommunications through groundbreaking research and innovation.