沟通是描述的关键组成部分:概念框架和文献回顾。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Terri R. Fried MD, Na Ouyang MSN, RN, Danijela Gnjidic PhD MPH, Ariel Green MD, Sarah Hilmer MD PhD, Holly M. Holmes MD, Sandra Ko MBA, Marcia Mecca MD, Emily Reeve BPharm Hons, PhD, Carmen E. Reyes BA, Nancy L. Schoenborn MD, MHS, Ranjit Singh MBBChir, MBA, Richard Street PhD, Robert G. Wahler Jr PharmD, BCGP, Melissa C. Funaro MS, MLS
{"title":"沟通是描述的关键组成部分:概念框架和文献回顾。","authors":"Terri R. Fried MD,&nbsp;Na Ouyang MSN, RN,&nbsp;Danijela Gnjidic PhD MPH,&nbsp;Ariel Green MD,&nbsp;Sarah Hilmer MD PhD,&nbsp;Holly M. Holmes MD,&nbsp;Sandra Ko MBA,&nbsp;Marcia Mecca MD,&nbsp;Emily Reeve BPharm Hons, PhD,&nbsp;Carmen E. Reyes BA,&nbsp;Nancy L. Schoenborn MD, MHS,&nbsp;Ranjit Singh MBBChir, MBA,&nbsp;Richard Street PhD,&nbsp;Robert G. Wahler Jr PharmD, BCGP,&nbsp;Melissa C. Funaro MS, MLS","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Deprescribing, the process of identifying and discontinuing potentially harmful or unnecessary medications, is a key component of caring for older persons. Communication is central to deprescribing. This study's objectives were to create a conceptual framework for deprescribing communication and to apply the framework to evaluate current and potential uses of communication in deprescribing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The consensus development working group comprises an international set of 14 experts in geriatrics, clinical pharmacology, communication, community outreach, and care partner stakeholders. Critical literature reviews describe (a) components of communication used in deprescribing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and (b) the content of studies examining deprescribing communication, knowledge, attitudes, and values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The framework demonstrates that communication extends beyond interactions between clinicians and patients. Communication can occur at the health system level, involving methods such as patient-specific feedback materials and academic detailing. Communication can also occur at the community level, involving entities such as pharmaceutical companies, the internet, community groups, and guidelines. Evaluation of the summary of RCTs against the framework demonstrates that intervention studies overwhelmingly focus on communication in individual clinical and health system-based encounters. Evaluation of the summary of observational studies demonstrates that there has been little study of the communication methods and styles themselves.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Potentially untapped opportunities exist to expand the use of different approaches for communication in deprescribing interventions, particularly in the community setting. More studies are required to elucidate and personalize the best content and style of deprescribing communication.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 3","pages":"717-727"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication as a key component of deprescribing: Conceptual framework and review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Terri R. Fried MD,&nbsp;Na Ouyang MSN, RN,&nbsp;Danijela Gnjidic PhD MPH,&nbsp;Ariel Green MD,&nbsp;Sarah Hilmer MD PhD,&nbsp;Holly M. Holmes MD,&nbsp;Sandra Ko MBA,&nbsp;Marcia Mecca MD,&nbsp;Emily Reeve BPharm Hons, PhD,&nbsp;Carmen E. Reyes BA,&nbsp;Nancy L. Schoenborn MD, MHS,&nbsp;Ranjit Singh MBBChir, MBA,&nbsp;Richard Street PhD,&nbsp;Robert G. Wahler Jr PharmD, BCGP,&nbsp;Melissa C. Funaro MS, MLS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Deprescribing, the process of identifying and discontinuing potentially harmful or unnecessary medications, is a key component of caring for older persons. Communication is central to deprescribing. This study's objectives were to create a conceptual framework for deprescribing communication and to apply the framework to evaluate current and potential uses of communication in deprescribing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The consensus development working group comprises an international set of 14 experts in geriatrics, clinical pharmacology, communication, community outreach, and care partner stakeholders. Critical literature reviews describe (a) components of communication used in deprescribing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and (b) the content of studies examining deprescribing communication, knowledge, attitudes, and values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The framework demonstrates that communication extends beyond interactions between clinicians and patients. Communication can occur at the health system level, involving methods such as patient-specific feedback materials and academic detailing. Communication can also occur at the community level, involving entities such as pharmaceutical companies, the internet, community groups, and guidelines. Evaluation of the summary of RCTs against the framework demonstrates that intervention studies overwhelmingly focus on communication in individual clinical and health system-based encounters. Evaluation of the summary of observational studies demonstrates that there has been little study of the communication methods and styles themselves.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Potentially untapped opportunities exist to expand the use of different approaches for communication in deprescribing interventions, particularly in the community setting. More studies are required to elucidate and personalize the best content and style of deprescribing communication.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"717-727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19305\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开处方,即识别和停用可能有害或不必要的药物的过程,是照顾老年人的一个关键组成部分。沟通是描述的核心。本研究的目的是创建一个描述沟通的概念框架,并应用该框架来评估沟通在描述中的当前和潜在用途。方法:共识制定工作组由14名来自老年病学、临床药理学、传播学、社区外展和护理合作伙伴利益相关者的国际专家组成。批判性文献综述描述了(a)描述性随机临床试验(rct)中使用的交流成分,以及(b)研究描述性交流、知识、态度和价值观的内容。结果:该框架表明,沟通超出了临床医生和患者之间的互动。沟通可以在卫生系统层面进行,包括针对患者的反馈材料和学术细节等方法。沟通也可以发生在社区层面,涉及实体,如制药公司、互联网、社区团体和指导方针。对照该框架对随机对照试验总结的评估表明,干预研究绝大多数侧重于个体临床和基于卫生系统的接触中的沟通。对观察性研究总结的评价表明,对交际方法和交际风格本身的研究很少。结论:存在潜在的未开发的机会,可以扩大使用不同的沟通方法来描述干预措施,特别是在社区环境中。需要更多的研究来阐明和个性化描述交流的最佳内容和风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication as a key component of deprescribing: Conceptual framework and review of the literature

Background

Deprescribing, the process of identifying and discontinuing potentially harmful or unnecessary medications, is a key component of caring for older persons. Communication is central to deprescribing. This study's objectives were to create a conceptual framework for deprescribing communication and to apply the framework to evaluate current and potential uses of communication in deprescribing.

Methods

The consensus development working group comprises an international set of 14 experts in geriatrics, clinical pharmacology, communication, community outreach, and care partner stakeholders. Critical literature reviews describe (a) components of communication used in deprescribing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and (b) the content of studies examining deprescribing communication, knowledge, attitudes, and values.

Results

The framework demonstrates that communication extends beyond interactions between clinicians and patients. Communication can occur at the health system level, involving methods such as patient-specific feedback materials and academic detailing. Communication can also occur at the community level, involving entities such as pharmaceutical companies, the internet, community groups, and guidelines. Evaluation of the summary of RCTs against the framework demonstrates that intervention studies overwhelmingly focus on communication in individual clinical and health system-based encounters. Evaluation of the summary of observational studies demonstrates that there has been little study of the communication methods and styles themselves.

Conclusions

Potentially untapped opportunities exist to expand the use of different approaches for communication in deprescribing interventions, particularly in the community setting. More studies are required to elucidate and personalize the best content and style of deprescribing communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信