韩文护士职业应对自我效能量表的效度与信度。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Youngrye Park, Sunah Park, Hee Ran Kang
{"title":"韩文护士职业应对自我效能量表的效度与信度。","authors":"Youngrye Park, Sunah Park, Hee Ran Kang","doi":"10.4040/jkan.24094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses (K-OCSE-N) scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The English version of the OCSE-N scale was translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation process. Data were gathered from 213 nurses employed in a general hospital in South Korea. The content validity was assessed using the content validity index. The construct validity was verified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Criterion validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients with the job stress coping and general self-efficacy scales. Reliability was examined using item-total score correlation and Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors that explained 61.8% of the cumulative variance: occupational burden and relational difficulty. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model exhibited adequate fit (χ²/df = 2.07, GFI = .95, SRMR = .04, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .97, and TLI = .95), with both convergent and discriminant validity deemed acceptable. The criterion validity presented a positive correlation of the K-OCSE-N with both job stress coping (r = .72, <i>p</i> < .001) and general self-efficacy (r = .72, <i>p</i> < .001). The internal consistency of the scale using Cronbach's α for the total items was .89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The K-OCSE-N scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy. This study suggests that various intervention studies can use the scale to assess and strengthen nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy in nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing","volume":"54 4","pages":"633-644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses].\",\"authors\":\"Youngrye Park, Sunah Park, Hee Ran Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.4040/jkan.24094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses (K-OCSE-N) scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The English version of the OCSE-N scale was translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation process. Data were gathered from 213 nurses employed in a general hospital in South Korea. The content validity was assessed using the content validity index. The construct validity was verified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Criterion validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients with the job stress coping and general self-efficacy scales. Reliability was examined using item-total score correlation and Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors that explained 61.8% of the cumulative variance: occupational burden and relational difficulty. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model exhibited adequate fit (χ²/df = 2.07, GFI = .95, SRMR = .04, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .97, and TLI = .95), with both convergent and discriminant validity deemed acceptable. The criterion validity presented a positive correlation of the K-OCSE-N with both job stress coping (r = .72, <i>p</i> < .001) and general self-efficacy (r = .72, <i>p</i> < .001). The internal consistency of the scale using Cronbach's α for the total items was .89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The K-OCSE-N scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy. This study suggests that various intervention studies can use the scale to assess and strengthen nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy in nursing practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"633-644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.24094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.24094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估韩国版护士职业应对自我效能感(K-OCSE-N)量表的效度和信度。方法:将英文版的OCSE-N量表通过翻译和反翻译的方法翻译成韩语。数据来自韩国一家综合医院的213名护士。采用内容效度指数评估内容效度。通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析验证了结构效度。采用Pearson相关系数与工作压力应对和一般自我效能量表进行效度评估。信度采用项目总分相关和Cronbach’s α系数进行内部一致性检验。结果:探索性因子分析发现职业负担和关系困难两个因素解释了61.8%的累积方差。在验证性因子分析中,模型表现出足够的拟合(χ²/df = 2.07, GFI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.04, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.95),收敛效度和判别效度均可接受。K-OCSE-N与工作压力应对(r = 0.72, p < .001)和一般自我效能感(r = 0.72, p < .001)呈显著正相关。量表采用Cronbach's α对总条目的内部一致性为0.89。结论:K-OCSE-N量表是测量护士职业应对自我效能感的有效、可靠的工具。本研究提示,在护理实践中,各种干预研究都可以使用该量表来评估和增强护士的职业应对自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses].

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses (K-OCSE-N) scale.

Methods: The English version of the OCSE-N scale was translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation process. Data were gathered from 213 nurses employed in a general hospital in South Korea. The content validity was assessed using the content validity index. The construct validity was verified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Criterion validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients with the job stress coping and general self-efficacy scales. Reliability was examined using item-total score correlation and Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors that explained 61.8% of the cumulative variance: occupational burden and relational difficulty. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model exhibited adequate fit (χ²/df = 2.07, GFI = .95, SRMR = .04, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .97, and TLI = .95), with both convergent and discriminant validity deemed acceptable. The criterion validity presented a positive correlation of the K-OCSE-N with both job stress coping (r = .72, p < .001) and general self-efficacy (r = .72, p < .001). The internal consistency of the scale using Cronbach's α for the total items was .89.

Conclusion: The K-OCSE-N scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy. This study suggests that various intervention studies can use the scale to assess and strengthen nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy in nursing practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing is published using an open access publication model. The journal welcomes original research on nursing intervention and health policies using appropriate research methods. Comprehensive review, concept analysis, and methodological papers are also welcome. The journal has a distinguished editorial board with extensive academic qualifications, ensuring that the journal maintains high scientific standards and has a broad international coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信